|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ban to continue on Terminator seed technology
The Hindu Business Line -
The ban on the controversial `terminator' seed technology, which threatened to impact farmers' rights, will continue, with the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), deciding to do so.
The Conference of Parties (CoP) of the CBD, which met in Brazil to discuss the issue, has decided to continue the global moratorium on the technology (called as terminator seed technology by NGOs).
According to the South Against Genetic Engineering (SAGE), a coalition of farmers movements, civil society groups, scientists, consumer movements from South India, the CoP decision comes in the wake of widespread opposition from across many countries.
Ready to try
Countries such as Canada, Australia and New Zealand backed by the US (not a party to CBD) and several agro chemical and biotech multinational corporations were, however, leading attempts to open the door to field testing of terminator seeds, SAGE said in a press release here.
These nations and corporates were insisting on a `case-by-case' assessment of such technologies. This text was rejected in the CBD's working group dealing with the issue. It needs to be formally adopted by the plenary of the CBD, which would meet on March 31.
Terminator technology refers to the genetic engineering technique by which the second generation seeds are rendered sterile, thus forcing the farmers to go back to the seed companies for the next season material.
It threatens the age-old practise of farmers storing seeds in on-farm seed banks and using them in subsequent seasons, NGOs alleged.
Ban demanded
Most campaigners in the CBD demanded a total ban on the terminator technology once and for all and emulate the governments of India and Brazil, which have already enacted such a ban, the SAGE release added, while hailing the decision as a genuine victory that would ensure biodiversity, food and livelihood security of billions of farmers globally.
Copyright © 2006
|
Biomaxx Systems Inc. to develop Biomass to electricity initiative, to meet new Ontario Government renewable energy purchase program.
Toronto, Ontario Canada - On March 21st, 2006 the Ontario Government's announced the new standards price they will pay for energy produced from renewable sources in Ontario. Biomaxx Systems Inc. (Other OTC: BMXSF) is particularly interested with the inclusion and recognition of electricity produced from biomass. Biomaxx Systems Inc. will now develop a new initiative to produce a commercially viable product offering for biomass to electricity production. In the past the challenge with renewable energy in Ontario, has been the lack of compensation for a grid tie system linking to the power grid, and the lack of commitment from the Ontario Power Authority.
Before this announcement, it was costly and complex for a renewable energy producer to sell their energy. This will create opportunities for farmers, landowners, communities, aboriginal groups, business owners and the hobby energy producer to sell power back to the Ontario Power Authority at a fixed market price under the Ontario's Standard Offer Program. The Ontario Power Authority will pay 11 cents per kilowatt hour for energy produced from wind, biomass, hydroelectric and will pay 42 cents per kilowatt hour for energy produced from solar.
The Premier of Ontario, Dalton McGinty announced the new standards price for renewable energy produced in Ontario. Entrepreneurs and businesses can sell clean power produced from solar, wind, biomass, and hydroelectric systems back to the power grid. "We're taking a bold new step that will allow hundreds of small, local, renewable energy producers to get into the energy market -- providing cleaner energy that will help meet Ontario's needs today -- and in the future," said Premier McGuinty.
"Standard Offer contracts have been the fastest and most successful way of producing renewable energy throughout the world," said Premier McGuinty. "Encouraging communities to develop more renewable electricity will spur the kind of innovation in the energy sector that will help clean up our air, create jobs and contribute to our long-term prosperity."
The program is expected to produce 1,000 megawatts of renewable energy to Ontario's energy supply which will be enough to power 250,000 homes and reduces dependence on other energy sources, reduces air pollution, protects the environment and will create new jobs and opportunities.
Attending the announcement was world-renowned scientist Dr. David Suzuki who stated "Ontarians need a reliable power system that doesn't leave a legacy of economic or environmental debt. Today's announcement will revolutionize the market for clean, renewable energy in North America and lay the groundwork for a healthier, brighter future."
The Ontario Government has been proactive in the development of a clean, reliable, affordable and sustainable energy supply in Ontario and this initiative follows up on the commitment to generate five per cent of the energy produced, representing 1350 megawatts, through renewables by 2007. Last year they came close with 1300 megawatts produced from renewable sources.
Biomaxx Systems Inc. expects demand for biomass to electricity related products and our expertise in this field will present great opportunities to the company. |
Why Canada should support Coexistence crops
By Robert Wager - Researcher at University of Guelph
There is no such thing as risk-free anything. However, this fact does not stop some from demanding risk-free agricultural biotechnology.
The controversies (mostly hypothetical) over genetically engineered (GE) crops and food never seem to end. As soon as one scare story is demonstrated to be false or highly unlikely, another floods the media. No doubt, this is by design. Canada recently stirred up a hornets nest when its representatives at the meeting of the U.N. Convention on Biodiversity in Bangkok called for the end to a de facto moratorium on the research and development of genetic use restriction technologies for genetically engineered crops. Recently several other countries have joined Canada in calling for an end to the ban.
Genetic use restriction technologies or GURTs are systems designed to prevent the unwanted transfer of transgenes (the DNA engineered into GE plants) to other plants or the unauthorized propagation of transgenic crops. There are several different ways they work, but these systems have one thing in common. They all block the possibility of the engineered genes and traits from ending up elsewhere.
Some GURT-containing GE seeds will not germinate, for example, while other GURT engineered plants will produce only sterile pollen. Either way, no genetically engineered genes will spread to other plants. This is why critics of GE crops call these terminator technologies. However, a more appropriate and descriptive term would be coexistence crops, since they would eliminate the possibility of two neighboring fields crossing with each other. Perhaps more than any other aspects of genetically engineered crops, these technologies have been the target of massive fear-generating campaigns by critics.
Critics say coexistence crops threaten farmers in the developing world by preventing the saving of seed from this year's crop for next years planting. But coexistence crops are not designed for developing world farmers. They are designed, in part, for farmers who already buy new seed each year. Most farmers in the developed world buy hybrid, certified or transgenic seed each year. These types of seed cost more, but produce far better yields, protect the environment or cost far less to grow, so the farmer gains in the end. Virtually all corn grown in North America is from hybrid seed with 50 per cent transgenic. Better than 70 per cent of the canola grown in Canada is transgenic. The benefits are well documented, including less pesticide use, healthier corn with less fungal toxin contamination and healthy canola oils that are trans-fat free.
The development and incorporation of coexistence crops would have several advantages over today's transgenic crops. Along with ending illegal propagation of transgenic crops, the issue of horizontal gene flow would also be eliminated. Therefore, there would no longer be any issue of cross-pollination between transgenic and organic crops.
Perhaps this is why certain groups are fighting the development of coexistence crops so ferociously. In fact, pollen from transgenic crops does not threaten organic crop certification at all. According to the International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements (IFOAM), there should not be any threshold of cross-pollination, and if it occurs it does not necessarily threaten the organic status of the product. The IFOAM does not even advocate mandatory testing for the cross-pollination of organically grown crops from transgenic ones.
It has been suggested that coexistence crops will threaten biodiversity. Critics claim the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety, of which Canada is a signature, prohibits the development of coexistence crops. However, Article 2 of the protocol states: "Parties shall ensure that the development, handling, transport, use and release of any living modified organism [international term for GE crops] are undertaken in a manner that prevents or reduces the risks to biodiversity."
Since coexistence crops would block gene flow from transgenic crops to other plants, their incorporation into biotechnology crops is actually in keeping with the International Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety agreement. There are approximately 60,000 seed varieties sold in North America each year. There are approximately 100 transgenic varieties of crops. It seems very far-fetched to suggest 100 transgenic varieties with sterile GURT engineering are going to threaten 60,000 non-transgenic varieties.
Blocking gene flow is important in another area of agricultural biotechnology. Up to now the production of most pharmaceuticals has required very expensive laboratories and production facilities. This is all about to change. Scientists have developed ways to make pharmaceuticals in plants. This has tremendous health and economic benefits. Where once a particular pharmaceutical might cost $100 per dose to produce, it can now be made in a plant for pennies. Everything from vaccines to heart medicines will be produced in genetically engineered plants. Of course, safety issues surrounding the growing of "pharma crops" have been considered in detail. There are very elaborate rules to maintain separation between food and pharmaceutical producing crops, including dedicated fields, large isolation distances, dedicated equipment, as well as separate storage and processing facilities.
Adding GURT technology to pharma crops would further increase the safety with the complete elimination of the possibility of pollen flow from pharma crops to related plants.
The whole world stands to benefit from such developments. Soon the lack of refrigeration that has hampered vaccine delivery in many parts of the world will no longer be a problem, for example. Pharma crops containing edible vaccines will be grown wherever they are needed. Two of the pharma crops furthest along in development contain vaccines for Hepatitis and Norwalk virus. Hundreds of millions of people stand to benefit from these advances in agricultural biotechnology.
Almost 10 years of growing biotechnology crops has demonstrated huge environmental benefits, better yields and healthier food with absolutely no demonstrated harm from consumption. Canada should be applauded for its call for a return of a science-based approach to continued research and development of coexistence crops. It is clear there are many benefits to incorporating coexistence crops into agricultural biotechnology.
|
Ottawa seeks 'suicide seed' testing
By Dennis Bueckert Bell Globe Media (excerpt)
OTTAWA Canada is lobbying at a major UN conference this week for an end to an international moratorium on the field testing of controversial so-called suicide seeds, despite opposition from farm organizations around the world, activists say.
The seeds, which are genetically modified to produce sterile offspring, are among the most controversial products biotechnology has yet produced, and critics say they could undermine traditional small-scale farming.
The seeds, officially known as Genetic Use Restriction Technology, require farmers to buy new seed every spring instead of saving some from the previous year's crop.
Canada joined other parties to the UN Convention on Biodiversity in imposing a moratorium on use of the seeds six years ago, but observers say the federal government is now advocating field tests on a case-by-case basis.
Countries that have ratified the UN convention are meeting in Curitiba, Brazil, to negotiate a "biosafety protocol" that would set rules for the handling of genetically engineered crops.
© Copyright 2006 Bell Globemedia Publishing Inc |
Canadian Seed Trade Association statement on Genetic use restriction technology's (GURT )
SeedQuest reports that the Canadian Seed Trade Association (CSTA) has not developed a position on genetic techniques to restrict the reproduction of plants. This science is in its infancy and it is impossible to comment on specific applications.
However, this technology does have the potential to create useful tools for agriculture. Particularly, GURTs may facilitate the development of new high-value products for the industry. For instance, the inclusion of traits useful in the production of pharmaceuticals and industrial polymers could create valuable new markets for crops.
Yet, these new products must be kept completely out of the conventional food stream and GURTs could facilitate this. GURTs hold the promise of solving issues of gene flow and volunteer management in mainstream crop production as well.
As a result, the CSTA believes any calls for moratoriums on this research are inappropriate and premature. The CSTA feels research should proceed and debate occur on implementing any such technologies based on the specifics of how they will operate and the context for their use.
|
Biotechnology and Industrial Sustainability: A Future Model for Quebec and Canada?
MONTREAL - Are Quebec and Canada contenders in the bioeconomy? Will we be able to capitalize on new alternatives to fossil fuels? In terms of the industrial or white biotechnology that might emerge in the green revolution, will Quebec and Canada be able to count on a sustainable industrial production model to make us more energy self-sufficient and improve our economic performance? These are just a few important issues that will be debated at the Crossroad of Biotechnology symposium on March 22 and 23, 2006, in Montreal. This year's theme is biotechnology and industrial sustainability. Topics that are at the centre of people's daily concerns around the world, such as new sources of biomass to replace oil, products related to the use of fossil fuels and the development of new enzymes, will be the subject of in-depth analysis by international experts and key industry leaders who will be meeting at the annual symposium, now in its 11th year.
"Today, all sectors agree that there is a need for a major change in
direction. The symposium is an ideal opportunity to study and discuss the most
promising trends in industrial biotechnology for society. This year, industry
stakeholders will play a greater role than ever before in the process," said
the Director General of the Biotechnology Research Institute,
Michel Desrochers.
The 2006 Crossroad symposium will welcome a number of internationally
renowned specialists including Pierre-Alain Chieb, OECD, France; Ralph Hardy,
US Department of Agriculture; Léon Magzinski, Tembec, Quebec; Dr. Willy
Verstraete, Ghent University, Belgium; Robert Di Cosimo, Dupont Chemicals, US;
and Jeffrey S. Tollan, Iogen Corporation (Canada).
The Crossroad of Biotechnology
After 10 years of undeniable success, the Crossroad of Biotechnology has now established itself as a key event bringing together the scientific and business communities in Montreal. The annual symposium, established by the National Research Council's Biotechnology Research Institute, is attended by nearly 300 participants from around the world. The Crossroad will be held at the NRC's Biotechnology Research Institute at 6100 Royalmount Avenue, Montreal. You can consult the symposium program at www.crossroadbiotech.ca or www.irb-bri.cnrc-nrc.gc.ca.
|
India's need for self-reliance in biotechnology stressed
BANGALORE - The second wave of the Green Revolution is on the move and hybrid cultures are essential for its success, Mangala Rai, Secretary, Department of Agricultural Research and Education, New Delhi, said here on Saturday.
Addressing students at the 40th convocation of the University of Agricultural Sciences, Mr. Rai said newer techniques in agricultural production are essential to improve productivity and increase yield. For this, India needs to develop self-reliance in critical components of biotechnology.
Mr. Rai also said that the focus should be on "appropriate biotechnologies" to develop crops that are insect resistant, viral, bacterial and fungal disease resistant, have high tolerance to drought and salinity and have nutritional benefits.
Additional foodgrains
The use of biotechnology for crops is essential if India is to meet the needs of its population by 2020. "By 2020, we may have to produce 50 per cent additional foodgrains to meet our needs. This will demand the production of an additional five million to six million tonnes of foodgrains per annum," he said.
Apart from introducing biotechnology into agriculture, there is also a need to promote produce.
Mr. Rai said super hybrid rice was developed in India a few years ago but it has not been used to its potential because many farmers do not know about it. China, he said, has made immense use of hybrid rice.
Degrees were conferred on 704 students at the convocation, of which 432 were graduate degrees, 236 were postgraduate degrees and 36 were doctoral degrees.
Twenty-six gold medals were awarded at the graduate level and 54 gold medals at the postgraduate level.
Keshava Reddy, an undergraduate, won 10 gold medals. The boy from Gauribidanur said his father had wanted him to become an engineer but he wanted to follow his family tradition and become an agriculturist. The family farms five acres of land.
"I am very glad that my efforts paid off. I plan to work on genetically modified cotton in the future," he said.
The university conferred the Dr. M.H. Marigowda State Award for Best Horticultural Farmer on H.K. Sreekanta, the Dr. M.H. Marigowda National Award for Best Horticultural Research to S.N. Pandey, the Board of Regents Best Farm Superintendent Award to Dasappa Madaiah and the Zuari Industries Ltd. Best Extension Work Award to N. Nagaraju.
|
Governments adopt international rules on trade in GMOs
The Third meeting of the 132 Parties to the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety (MOP3) was concluded on 17 March in Curitiba, Brazil. It adopted a landmark decision on detailed documentation requirements for genetically modified organisms in the international trade of agricultural commodities.
In the final hours of negotiations, trade implications of documentation requirements were the main focus of major players such as Mexico and Brazil. The final compromise would have not been possible without the political commitment of the Brazilian government to make MOP3 a success.The European Commission negotiated on behalf of the EU and played an important role in brokering the final compromise.
Environment Commissioner Dimas stated: "This decision sets out documentation requirements that are clear, meaningful and practical for both exporters and importers of agricultural products, while being consistent with EU law. It provides for legal certainty for the international trade in agricultural commodities. As such, it is a landmark decision that bolsters the role of the Cartagena Protocol.I would like to express my deep appreciation to the Brazilian government that has been instrumental to achieve this outcome."
In addition to the documentation requirements, MOP3 took decisions on a range of other issues that will enhance the effective implementation of the Protocol, including:
-biosafety capacity-building activities in developing countries,
-risk assessment for GMOs,
-the operation of the web-based information exchange portal established by the Protocol, the so called Biosafety Clearing House.
Background
The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety is the only international treaty governing the cross-border transport of genetically modified organisms. The Protocol is a supplementary agreement to the 1992 Convention on Biological Biodiversity. The rules set out in the Protocol are intended to promote the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity and protect the public from the potentially harmful effects of GMOs. The Protocol entered into force on 11 September 2003 and currently has 132 Parties, including all Member States and the European Community.
The Cartagena Protocol is incorporated into EU legislation through a wide range of laws. The cornerstone of this legal framework is Directive 2001/18/EC on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms. It is supplemented by a Regulation on the transboundary movements of GMOs, which was adopted in 2003.
|
Human Genetic Materials, Intellectual Property and the Health Sector
OTTAWA, The Canadian Biotechnology Advisory Committee (CBAC) released its report, Human Genetic Materials, Intellectual Property and the Health Sector
The number of inventions involving human genetic materials is growing rapidly. Concerns about the effects of granting intellectual property (IP) rights over human genetic materials were exacerbated in recent years by cases in which patent holders exercised IP rights in ways that many view as detrimental to both development of new health innovations and access to them by Canadians.
The report was delivered to the Deputy Ministers of Health and of Industry, who had requested CBAC's advice on this important and challenging matter. As stated in the report, CBAC believes action is needed now to enhance Canada's IP regime so that it is better prepared to meet the dual objectives of encouraging health innovation and making the benefits of innovation readily accessible to Canadians.
CBAC's report is based on the work of an Expert Working Party established by CBAC to assist it in the development of its advice to government. The Expert Working Party's report to CBAC "Human Genetic Materials: Making
Canada's Intellectual Property Regime Work for the Health of Canadians" was released earlier so that comments on it could be considered by CBAC in arriving at its conclusions and recommendations.
CBAC is a body of external experts established in 1999 by the Government of Canada. CBAC provides advice to government on current policy issues associated with the ethical, social, regulatory, scientific, environmental, health, and economic aspects of biotechnology.
|
99.9% Testing Success Rate - Higher Productivity, Reduced Client Cost Good for Everyone!
Buy a carton of milk at the grocery store and you expect it to be the best quality. But how that quality happens isn’t something the average person thinks about.
In the Laboratory Services Division at the University of Guelph, ensuring the quality and safety of Ontario's food supply from production through to processing is their business. Ontario food producers, processors and regulators from Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (OMAFRA) and Dairy Farmers of Ontario depend on Laboratory Services’ analytical research and regulatory testing to ensure agriculture and food excellence.
Every day, up to 8,000 samples of milk arrive at the laboratory on the Guelph campus about one million samples a year.
Until late 2005, all those samples were processed manually by a technician in the lab who reviewed each vial to determine what testing was required and sort the samples into appropriate bins.
The problem? Take a highly educated laboratory technician, ask them to spend all day sorting test samples where the majority of samples simply get stored or discarded and you’ve got a recipe for job-related tension, human error, and repetitive stress syndrome.
Laboratory Services recognized the need to eliminate that manual task. But with a million samples a year, the job had to get done.
In Ontario, milk producers are tested randomly for composition, fat, protein, lactose, total solids as specified by the Dairy Farmers of Ontario, and for quality, antibiotic residue, bacterial cell counts and freezing point estimates as requested by the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs.
Every test sample from the 5000 milk-producing dairy farms around the province gets logged in, in the field by milk-transporters and sample information is forwarded to the Dairy Farmers of Ontario. Each night, the sample list is downloaded to Laboratory Services and scheduled for testing. The samples in customized vials are sent to the lab daily and when they arrive someone must sort them one by one for appropriate tests or storage. Approximately two-thirds of samples do not have tests assigned to them the tests are randomly assigned and for someone sorting the vials, the job is mind-numbing.
Laboratory Services decided to automate the process. When the laboratory went looking for an automation solution, it got a wide variety of proposals.
“We put the project out for tender to automate the process of sorting the samples,” says Charles Fulton, supervisor of the Dairy Analysis section of Laboratory Services. “We got numerous proposals, each with their own defined approach. We selected the solution from Andor Robotic Solutions.”
Andor Robotic Solutions is a Guelph-based company that focuses on building automated systems to ensure each a process runs smoothly and delivers expected productivity output. The company offers turn-key solutions for automation that are tailored to the specific requirements of a customer’s operation.
The solution Andor proposed involved a high-speed, flexible robot, which was implemented to scan the bar code on the top of each vial. The samples arrive at the laboratory on racks, 32 samples in a rack. The racks are placed under the robot which then scans the bar code, identifies the most common test sample, and then pulls the others out and sorts them into seven different areas.
“Andor’s experience with the robot indicated that it would be ideal for handling of glass vials and small bar code labels,” says Steve Spanjers, Engineering Manager at Andor Robotic Solutions. “Because we knew it could handle the precise placement of delicate parts at a high-speed rate that could easily accommodate the 8000-plus samples a day, we developed the University of Guelph Laboratory Services solution with the robot as an integral part.”
The robot is capable of processing one sample per second or 30,000 samples in an 8 hour day at the moment, the system is running at 30% capacity. With all that power, Laboratory Services is well-positioned to handle future growth.
The Laboratory Services technicians responsible for the scanning and processing of all test vials were enthralled with the speed of the robot and thankful for eliminating one of the more mundane tasks of processing the sample testing.
And Fulton is pleased. Just three months into the system launch, Laboratory Services moved its testing success rate to 99.9% and its composition testing cost to its lowest level ever.
Long term, Laboratory Services expects to see improvements in their health and safety record often intangible results of an automation such as this. By eliminating mundane tasks, which can lead to claims for repetitive strain injury and make employee retention difficult, Fulton will see improvements in staff morale, cost management and overall productivity.
“Based on my rough estimates, I expect it to take about 18 months to realize the payback from the system. But I’m already thrilled with the results,” says Fulton.
|
Agricultural biotechnology critical for biodiversity protection
CURITIBA, Brazil - Agricultural biotechnology is necessary for the conservation and enhancement of biodiversity. As officials from 132 nations meet in Brazil this week for a UN meeting under the Biosafety Protocol, the plant science industry reminds governments of the vital role biotech innovations play in achieving sustainable agriculture and development:
Biotech crops are essential to conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity the overall objective of the Biosafety Protocol. They enable more efficient use of water in agriculture, reduce soil erosion, prevent loss of biodiversity, and increase air quality. By making farming more efficient on limited land area, they are critical for preventing habitat destruction the biggest single threat to biodiversity.
Biotechnology is an established technology, having been used in research for more than 30 years, and with biotech crops commercially available for more than 10 years. In this time, there has been no proven harm to humans or the environment.
These crops are delivering major benefits to farmers and society, through increased yields, higher incomes, simplified crop management, and, in some cases, reductions in the use of pesticides.
Global planted area of biotech crops has soared by more than fifty-fold from 1.7 million hectares in six countries in 1996 to 90 million hectares in 21 countries in 2005. Last year, some 8.5 million farmers planted biotech crops mostly in developing countries. This is because small scale farmers tend to benefit most from biotech crops, as insect and disease protected crops provide new and previously unavailable tools to combat pest problems.
A study by PG Economics released last October showed that farmers using biotechnology increased their incomes by US$27 billion during the period 1996 to 2004with significant environmental benefits delivered. Importantly, the accumulative economic benefits during the nine years to developing countries ($15 billion), exceeded benefits to industrial countries ($12 billion).
As the biotech debate takes place in Curitiba, Brazilian farmers will be reaping their first legal harvest of biotech soybeans, having been given the green light from regulators in 2005.Brazil is the third largest country user of biotech crops (behind the USA and Argentina) and the largest user of all Parties to the Biosafety Protocol.
“Given the important economic, environmental and human health benefits of biotechnology, we simply cannot understand why many activists are trying to use the Biosafety Protocol to deny farmers and consumers around the world the ability to use these products for years to come,” stated Christian Verschueren, Director General, CropLife International.
“Let’s hope that farmers’ voices, safety, and consumer interests will be taken into consideration this week so that decisions are taken on key issues - including documentation requirements, risk assessment and capacity building - that will ensure those who want to provide for the future sustainably, can continue to use this technology,” he continued.
CropLife International has recently made available an online database of peer-reviewed scientific studies on the benefits and safety of biotech crops. This can be accessed at www.croplife.org/biotechdatabase.
|
Brazil to press for global biodiversity regime
By Roberto Villar Belmonte
CURITIBA, Brazil - Curbing the loss of biodiversity and achieving an international regime governing access to genetic resources will be the two top priorities of Brazil, which is hosting the eighth conference of the parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (COP-8), Brazilian Environment Minister Marina Silva told IPS.
"Our motto is ‘implementation', since there are already a large number of international treaties that have to be translated into concrete action," said the minister, who will preside over COP-8, to be held Mar. 20-31 in the southern Brazilian city of Curitiba.
"Over the next two years, we are going to work hard in order for the international regime to be binding, and so that it is not understood as a tool to facilitate access, but to ensure protection and sustainable use and the distribution of benefits" and profits arising from the use of genetic resources, she announced.
The adoption of a regime governing access to genetic resources and the equitable sharing of benefits derived from the use of biodiversity and biological wealth is key to meeting the Convention's target of reducing the rate of loss of diversity of habitat and of animal and plant species by 2010.
During COP-8, Brazil will try to strengthen political coordination with the "Group of Like-Minded Megadiverse Countries", made up of 17 developing nations, said Silva.
Another of Brazil's aims is to announce, during the conference, a draft law that would regulate access to biodiversity and guarantee the rights of local communities.
The minister did not attend the first day of the May 13-17 "Third meeting of the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety" (COP-MOP3) Monday in Curitiba.
But she announced in Sao Paulo that Brazil had reached a decision on the labeling of cross-border shipments of transgenic products.
The Cartagena Protocol to the Convention on Biological Diversity has been in effect since September 2003, and is aimed at protecting biodiversity from the potential risks posed by living organisms modified through modern biotechnology.
President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva's decision settled differences over the question in his cabinet by opting to accept the wording "contains LMOs (living modified organisms)" for the labels, rather than "may contain LMOs", as he had pushed for at the COP-MOP2, held nine months ago in Montreal.
But in Curitiba this month, Brasilia will negotiate a four-year timetable for countries and companies to gradually put into effect a system of mandatory labeling and separation of products containing LMOs. During that period, labels would read "may contain LMOs", along with a list of the genetic modification procedures approved in the country exporting the product.
After the period of adaptation, all cross-border shipments would have to be clearly identified as containing LMOs, by labels that would also provide information on genetic engineering.
Brazil decided on pressing for a four-year transition period because it allows countries to gradually create the internal conditions for the labeling of transgenic products, said a statement issued by the Environment Ministry.
Minister Silva, who said the position taken by Brazil would help overcome the biggest hurdle in the negotiations on the Cartagena Protocol, added that "Now we have to negotiate this week, in order to keep moving forward."
But the decision was not welcomed by agribusiness representatives. "We consider the Brazilian government's current proposal frustrating. It will place a very large onus on Brazilian agriculture, because we will have to segregate products from their point of origin," said Carlo Lovatelli, president of the Brazilian Association of Vegetable Oil Industries.
Nevertheless, he added, there could be changes before Friday. "We have information that some Latin American countries, like Mexico, Colombia, Paraguay, Peru and Nicaragua, could opt for the ‘may contain' wording previously advocated by Brazil," he told IPS.
Lovatelli presented an economic study at COP-MOP3, according to which the requirement to identify LMOs would raise soy bean production costs by between eight and nine percent.
"If Brazil sticks by its position, we would have to ask for financial support from the government in order to comply with the Protocol," he said.
Soy beans are the main transgenic crop produced by Brazil and Argentina.
Environmental groups praised Lula's instructions for Brazilian negotiators to back the "contains LMOs" wording, but criticised the four-year timetable for implementation, arguing that many incidents of transgenic contamination could occur over that period.
"From our point of view, agribusiness has already had six years to adjust to the Cartagena Protocol, which was approved in 2000," observed Marijane Lisboa, a representative of the Organic Agriculture Association and a professor at the Catholic University of Sao Paulo.
"Four more years is unacceptable, because in the last six months alone, there were cases of contamination in dozens of countries. Agribusiness has been left to adapt to the new regulations when it feels like it," she commented to IPS.
Statements by diplomats from Mexico, Nicaragua and Peru that echo the stance dropped by Brazil have sparked suspicion among the environmentalists attending COP-MOP3.
"All of these countries have had incidents of transgenic contamination or have received unidentified transgenic corn as food aid from the United States. It is remarkable that they are not defending the interests of their populations here, since they have already proven to be unable to identify transgenic products," remarked Lisboa, a former Greenpeace representative and former secretary of environmental quality at the Brazilian Environment Ministry in 2003 and 2004.
In order to be consistent with its new stance, the Brazilian government should send the police to investigate why the agribusiness sector is not complying with the labeling requirements for transgenic foodstuffs stipulated by Brazilian law, said Joao Pedro Stedile, a national coordinator for the Landless Workers' Movement (MST), speaking on behalf of the international peasant and small farmers'movement, Vía Campesina, at the opening of the Civil Society Global Forum taking place parallel to COP-MOP3.
On Tuesday morning, roughly 1,000 Vía Campesina activists occupied facilities owned by the Switzerland-based transnational agribusiness giant Syngenta in Santa Teresa do Oeste, some 550 km from Curitiba.
The protesters demanded an end to the company's illegal experiments with transgenics at the installation, which are prohibited because of its proximity to Iguazu National Park, a conservation area.
Copyright © 2006 IPS-Inter Press Service
|
Biotech industry cautions govts that unnecessary GMO regulations will impede trade
CURITIBA, Brazil - As the 3rd Meeting of Parties to the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety (the Biosafety Protocol) kicks off March 14, 2006, the plant science industry urges governments to finally take a decision on a global documentation system for agricultural biotech products, but warns that unnecessary and costly requirements could severely restrict international trade.
“We hope that the 132 Parties to the Protocol recognize that current documentation systems used for international trade of these products works well. Going beyond this to require exporters to specify which biotech material is present and in what exact quantity, for each individual shipment is simply unworkable in today’s highly efficient agriculture bulk handling system. It would not provide information that could be used to benefit biodiversity or advance any of the aims of the Protocol,” stated Christian Verschueren, Director General, CropLife International.
“Biotech crops have been proven to be safe, both for the environment and human consumption. Any decisions regarding their passage across international borders should be based in science, not fear. New documentation regulations would create confusion, delays and impose costs across a variety of sectors, and ignore our vast experience and scientific understanding of these products,” he continued.
“Most importantly, they would serve to prevent the millions of farmers around the world, as well as the industry groups, researchers and governments, who want to benefit from this technology, from doing so.”
A study released last year by the International Food and Agricultural Trade Policy Council* showed that, while most of the additional costs of detailed documentation requirements would be borne by the handful of large countries that import the largest volume of food and feed grains, a disproportionate share of those costs would fall on consumers in smaller developing and least developed countries.
An updated study released last week and focusing on two countries China and Brazil showed that the Biosafety Protocol acts exactly like a tariff for importing countries, keeping trade down and forcing prices up. Costs would also rise for exporting countries,which would need to establish costly identity preservation systems. Both studies can be accessed at www.agritrade.org.
“Perhaps governments might consider how they dedicate the spend of taxpayers money, and avoid diverting limited resources from the protection of biodiversity to the establishment of unnecessary requirements based on hypothetical risks?” continued Verschueren.
“Implementation of the Biosafety Protocol should focus first on helping countries build their own regulatory and scientific capacities to use, control and import biotech products.”
The Biosafety Protocol, which will be discussed in Curitiba, Brazil this week, is an international treaty under the UN Convention on Biological Diversity and seeks to protect the world's biodioversity from any risks presented by biotechnology.
The Protocol calls on Parties to take measures to implement a global documentation system for shipments of biotech products under Article 18.2. Currently, an exporter of biotech crops destined for food, feed or processing must indicate that an export cargo “may contain” LMOs. Parties will debate proposals to increase requirements to specify which LMOs are present, and, in what proportions, for each individual vessel. This will require vast changes in the way commodities are produced, harvested, transportedand shipped, with cost implications for farmers, the biotech industry, export/shipping companies and consumers, and without any apparent benefits for biodiversity.
|
US House votes to override state food-label laws
By Charles Abbott
WASHINGTON - Despite opposition from consumer groups and state officials, the U.S. House passed a bill on Wednesday to create uniform food labels nationwide at the cost, foes said, of overriding 200 state food-safety laws.
Backers say a uniform standard is preferable to food safety warnings and labeling rules that vary by state. The bill, passed 283-139, now goes to the Senate.
While the food industry said the bill was aimed solely at simplifying food labels, opponents forecast havoc. States would have to remove warnings about dangerous items in foods, they said, and lose authority to inspect and regulate food. States and localities do 80 percent of the nation's food inspections.
"Within a matter of months, 200 state food safety laws would be wiped off the books," said Rep. Louise Slaughter, New York Democrat, because the Food and Drug Administration would gain the power to "invalidate state labeling laws."
Under the bill, states would need FDA approval for labeling requirements, whether new or already in effect, that differ from federal standards. Currently states can adopt warnings or label rules that exceed federal standards.
"This bill is about protecting the food safety of every citizen in the nation," said Michigan Republican Mike Rogers, sponsor of the bill. If a warning has merit, he said, it should be applied nationwide.
Eleven senators have spoken against the bill, said Erik Olson of the Natural Resources Defense Council, which opposes the bill. Olson said there would be little Senate interest, with elections set for November, in weakening public health protections.
Consumer warnings about mercury in fish, arsenic in bottled water, lead in ceramic tableware and alcohol in candy are at jeopardy under the bill, said 39 state attorneys general in a letter to Congress last week.
State health officers and agriculture departments said the bill would compromise their power to inspect food plants, order the clean-up of unsafe conditions or ban contaminated foods. Two consumer groups also warned of the far reach of the bill.
The Grocery Manufacturers Association said critics misinterpreted the legislation.
"By providing consistent, science-based food safety standards and warning requirements, all consumers will be able to have confidence in the safety of the food supply and the information on food labels, regardless of where they live," said GMA President Manly Molpus.
Before passing the bill, representatives approved amendments that would soften the impact on states somewhat by:
allowing states to set standards on adulteration or food tolerances if the FDA has not acted on the issue;
requiring expedited FDA review of state petitions that deal with substances that may cause cancer or cause birth defects;
letting states issue warnings about mercury in fish;
barring the bill from becoming law if the Homeland Security Department said it would weaken defenses against bioterrorism.
[According to a related article (St. Louis Post-Dispatch; March 5), opponents say that the bill would forestall state and local efforts to impose labeling requirements on genetically modified (GM) food.]
|
EU Commission reports on national measures to ensure co-existence of GM crops with conventional and organic farming
Commission reports on national measures to ensure co-existence of genetically modified crops with conventional and organic farming.
The development of EU-wide legislation on the co-existence of genetically modified crops with conventional and organic farming does not appear justified at this time, in view of the EU’s limited experience with the cultivation of GM crops and the need to conclude the process of introducing national measures. This is the main conclusion of a new report from the European Commission, published today. However, before any decision is taken, the Commission will engage in an in-depth consultative process with stakeholders.
A conference in Vienna on 5-6 April will provide an ideal occasion for such a discussion. Co-existence measures are the subject of a Commission Recommendation from July 2003. They are designed to ensure that GM crops can be grown along with non-GM crops without negative economic consequences caused by accidental mixing of the two. The Commission proposes to work jointly with the Member States and stakeholders on the development of recommendations for crop-specific technical segregation measures.
“The development of efficient and cost-effective strategies to ensure co-existence is vital to ensure a practical choice between GM and non-GM produce for farmers and consumers,” said Mariann Fischer Boel, Commissioner for Agriculture and Rural Development. “This is not a question of health or environmental protection, because no GMOs are allowed on the EU market unless they have been proved to be completely safe. To ensure that consumers know exactly what they are buying the EU has developed an advanced labelling and traceability system for GMOs. Segregation measures must be in place to ensure that accidental traces of GMOs in conventional or organic products are kept within the strict ranges defined by EU legislation. Growing conditions are very varied from country to country and experience with GM crops is still limited in Europe. It therefore does not seem appropriate to propose unified EU rules at this time.”
Experience with the cultivation of GM crops remains extremely limited in the EU. Commercial cultivation has so far been limited to two types of GM maize. In Spain, GM maize cultivation amounted to 58,000 hectares in 2004, or about 12 percent of total Spanish maize cultivation. In other Member States, cultivation is limited to a few hundred hectares. In Spain, GM maize has been grown since 1998 under a non-binding code of good practice.
On 23 July 2003, the Commission adopted a Recommendation on guidelines for the development of national strategies and best practices, to help Member States develop national legislative or other strategies for co-existence. Most Member States are still developing national approaches, with specific co-existence legislation adopted in four Member States (Germany, Denmark, Portugal and six of the Austrian Länder) by the end of 2005. Monitoring programmes still have to be set up and implemented in order to verify the effectiveness and economic feasibility of the measures taken.
Co-existence measures aim at protecting farmers of non-GM crops from the possible economic consequences of accidental mixing of crops with GMOs. The Commission Recommendation states that co-existence measures should not go beyond what is necessary to ensure that accidental traces of GMOs in non-GM products stay below EU labelling thresholds in order to avoid any unnecessary burden for the operators concerned. Measures should be science-based and proportionate and must not generally forbid the growing of GM crops.
Most Member States have based their approaches on management measures applicable at the level of individual farms or in coordination between neighbouring farms. The onus of implementing segregation measures has generally been placed on GM crop growers. The very diverse nature of EU farming means that co-existence measures have to be adapted to local conditions and crop types, and make it imperative to ensure the maximum degree of flexibility for the Member States in developing their national approaches.
The Commission believes there is a need to gather further experience before departing from the current subsidiarity-based approach set out in the 2003 Recommendation. However, it intends to take very careful notice of the opinions expressed by stakeholders. The co-existence conference organised in Vienna on 5-6 April 2006 will provide such an occasion. In the meantime, the Commission proposes to strengthen its efforts to ensure the maximum cooperation between Member States; analyse the latest scientific and economic information available on segregation measures; develop jointly with the Member States best practices for technical segregation measures leading to crop-specific recommendations; and obtain more information on national civil liability systems. In 2008, the Commission will report on the progress made, including an update on the development and implementation of national co-existence measures.
|
Biomaxx Systems Inc. accepted as member for Bioenergy Australia
Toronto - Biomaxx Systems Inc. is pleased to announce that the company has been accepted as a member of Bioenergy Australia (http://www.bioenergyaustralia.org). Bioenergy Australia was established in 1997 as a government industry forum to foster and facilitate the development of biomass to energy conversion, bio based product development and liquid fuels. Bioenergy Australia is concerned with all aspects of biomass and Bioenergy including the production, technical aspects and the commercial, economic, social, environmental, policy and market issues affecting the alternative fuels industry. The founding members of Bioenergy Australia include Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation (RIRDC) and the Australian Greenhouse Office (AGO) of the Australian Governmentâ s Department of the Environment and Heritage, which manages the programs under the Australian Governmentâ s $1.8 billion climate change strategy.
Biomaxx Systems is excited to be a member of Bioenergy Australia and the opportunity to be involved in the Bioenergy and ethanol industry in Australia. Dr. Stephen Schuck, the manager of Bioenergy Australia states - â I look forward to working with BioMaxx Systems in Australia to further develop the Bioenergy and biofuels industries.â Bioenergy Australia is an organization fostering the development of Bioenergy in Australia and consisting of some 50 member organizations from both the government and industries sectors. Our organizations are in agreement that there is a growing and considerable interest in biofuels in Australia, including ethanol production. According to Dr. Schuck, Australia has a national biofuels target of 350 million liters biofuels by 2010, with several government measures supporting biofuels. The Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation, the lead organization and co-founding organization for Bioenergy Australia had authored a report â Wood ! for Alcohol Fuels â using farm forestry for Bioenergyâ , a topic which is closely related to the BioMaxx Systemsâ business model.
Bioenergy Australia currently has 50 member organizations, both from the private and government sectors. Bioenergy Australia has a wide spectrum of members and include; Alstom Power Ltd.(Power generation, transportation and power service), Rio Tinto (mining and mineral exploration), Babcock and Brown (Financing firm), Stanwell Corp. (Government owned energy co.), Western Power Corp (Renewable Energy supplier), Collex, Ergon Energy and many more. A complete list of the Bioenergy Australia members is available at - http://www.bioenergyaustralia.org/members.html |
Biotechnology spending by the federal government - 2004/05
The federal government spent $791 million on biotechnology in the fiscal year 2004/05, up 6.3% from $744 million the previous year. Over half of the money went to the higher education sector.
Spending on biotechnology represented 9% of all federal spending on science and technology in 2004/05.
The majority (96%) of biotechnology spending was devoted to research and development.
Two-thirds (67%) of biotechnology science and technology activities were performed outside the federal government. The largest recipient was still the higher education sector, which received $403 million, or just over half of the total.
There were 1,656 full-time equivalent person-years devoted to biotechnology science and technology activities in the federal government, down from 1,727 during 2003/04.
|
Argentina asks EU to intervene in dispute with Monsanto
By Karina Grazina
BUENOS AIRES, Argentina - Argentina has asked the European Commission to intercede in the country's conflict with biotech giant Monsanto Co. over royalty payments on the company's Roundup Ready soybean seeds, an Argentine agriculture official said on Tuesday.
The U.S.-based company has filed lawsuits against soy importers in at least three European countries and stopped six shipments of Argentine soymeal in the last year in an effort to enforce its patent rights on Roundup Ready in Europe.
The company has no patent in Argentina but nearly all local farmers plant the seeds, genetically engineered to resist the herbicide Roundup. Some of them buy certified seed, but others buy contraband or legally extract and reuse the GMO seeds on their own farms without paying royalties.
At stake is nearly $2 billion in annual trade of Argentine soymeal to Europe. Argentina is the world's top soymeal supplier and the European Union is its No. 1 client.
"We presented a broad report, explaining what is happening in Europe regarding Monsanto's stopping of soymeal shipments from Argentina," agricultural attaché Gustavo Idigoras told Reuters via telephone from Brussels.
Idigoras said each delayed shipment costs importers about 850,000 euros (about $1 million).
In the document submitted to the Commission on Monday, Argentina said "Monsanto's action is an unjustified obstacle to the legitimate trade of soymeal" and an abuse of the company's dominant market position, Idigoras said.
A source at the Agriculture Secretariat explained Argentina's strategy: "We hope the EU opens an investigation into Monsanto's practices to see if they are abusive and monopoly-related. And if that is the case, we hope they will take punitive measures against the company."
Stalemate growing staler
Monsanto has been lobbying for a new royalty payment scheme in Argentina for the last two years. The company argues that the lawsuits filed in Europe are aimed at forcing Argentina to recognize Monsanto's right to charge royalties on Roundup Ready soy.
But the government says the company aims to "set a price that is different from market prices for biotech soymeal in Europe. That is what the company is doing when it tries to strike a deal with importers," Idigoras said.
Last year, Monsanto offered European importers licenses to import Argentine soy in exchange for their royalty payments, but no agreement was reached.
Two weeks ago, Monsanto proposed to the Agriculture Secretariat that it would stop delaying shipments in Europe if the government pledged to respect and apply any judicial decision in Europe to all Argentine soy exports.
"We have not had any type of response," said Monsanto Argentina spokesman Federico Ovejero.
"We hope that we can sit down and find some kind of solution, but today, in light of the secretariat's silence, we understand that the only alternative continues to be legal action," Ovejero said.
|
EU example for others to block entry of GM food
By Harish Mehta - Business Times Singapore
It is now clear that giant American food companies do intend to pry open foreign markets where they will sell genetically modified (GM) food, despite overwhelming evidence that it poses risks to human and animal health and is hazardous to the environment.
In a barely-noticed judgment, the World Trade Organisation (WTO) court ruled last month that Europe violated its rules when it banned GM food imports from 1999 to 2003. The ruling was a victory for the United States, which had dragged Europe to that court. But consumers in Europe do not like being told by the WTO about what they should eat and they are likely to disdain any attempt to foist GM food on them.
Hungary, Greece and Austria oppose GM food, and other European countries are keen to remain GM food-free. lt appears that although the US may have won a court victory at the WTO, it will not be able to persuade individual countries to import or produce GM food.
So, what was behind the American court battle at the WTO? lt appears that the US knows it cannot breach the walls of Europe and is hoping to use the WTO ruling as a precedent to penetrate new markets in Asia, Africa and Latin America.
Consider the facts first. More than two-thirds of GM American corn is currently exported to Asia and Africa. American companies producing GM food, such as Monsanto, have been trying to penetrate developing countries. Some developing countries such as Brazil welcome GM food, but others such as Bolivia reject it. The picture is mixed in India, where some states are opposed to GM food. Protests against GM food have been seen in the Philippines, Korea and Indonesia.
lt is time for the developing world to take note of the intentions of GM food producers. Last December, Indian environment activist Vandana Shiva and French activist Jose Bove launched a campaign. They handed a petition signed by 135,000 citizens of 100 countries to WTO officials to oppose the trade dispute filed by the US against Europe. The petition asked the WTO not to undermine the rights of the European Union to protect its ecology and environment from GM food.
Last November, three new studies of the effects of GM food on health triggered fresh demands for GM ingredients in human food and animal feed to be banned immediately. One study, conducted by Russian scientist Irina Ermakova, showed that more than half the offspring of mice fed on GM soya died within three weeks of birth. A second study, conducted at the Universities of Pavia and Urbino in Italy, showed that mice fed on GM soya experienced a slowdown in cellular metabolism and modifications to the liver and pancreas. A third study, by the Commonwealth Scientific and Research Organisation in Australia, showed that the introduction of genes from a bean variety into a GM pea led to the creation of a novel protein which caused inflammation of the lung tissue of mice.
The alarming news is that while food has often been used as a foreign policy weapon, food aid is now being used as a weapon to create markets for the biotechnology industry and its GM foods. The most dramatic example of this sort of aid was the attempt by the US Agency for International Development to push GM maize - disguised as food aid - in Zambia, Zimbabwe, Lesotho, Mozambique and Malawi.
Zambian President Levy Mwanawasa said his people would rather die than eat toxic food. At a meeting in Lusaka on Aug 12, 2002, farmers, women's groups, Church and other leaders, MPs and government officials recommended that Zambia should not accept GM food aid. The Zambian President pleaded that Zambians not be used as guinea pigs. Malawi accepted the GM maize because of its severe food crisis, which critics say was caused by World Bank and International Monetary Fund structural adjustment programmes which forced the country to sell its maize reserves to repay commercial loans.
Despite these warning signals, the GM food juggernaut is running unchecked. Last April, the environmental group Greenpeace said GM rice was being sold in China even though it had not been approved for public consumption. Since 2001, China has imported more than 20 million tonnes of GM food annually, most of which is soya bean which is used to produce edible oil.
Ms Shiva says genetic engineering will not contribute to Third World food security since it has little to do with increasing food yields. lt is related more significantly to traits such as herbicide resistance, which allows the West to sell more chemicals. lt is time for Asia, Africa and Latin America to take a lesson from Europe and block GM food from entering their countries.
|
Biomaxx Systems Inc. signs agreement with renowned Biotechnologist - Professor Dr. Naim Kosaric
TORONTO-Biomaxx Systems Inc. is pleased to announce it has signed an agreement with Professor Dr. Naim Kosaric, P. Eng. Under the terms of the agreement Biomaxx Systems and Professor Kosaric will collaborate in the areas of mutual scientific and technical matters of biotechnology and environmental engineering. Biomaxx Systems Inc. and Professor Dr. Naim Kosaric anticipate that new technologies, products and processes in the field of biotechnology will be developed as a result of this agreement.
Summary - Professor Dr. Naim Kosaric
Prof. Dr. Kosaric has been actively involved in biotechnology for over 35 years and has had experience as an engineer, scientist and professor. Prof. Dr. Kosaric is very active in consulting specifically in the areas of the utilization of natural resources for the production of renewable energy such as hydrogen, biofuels and biogas and environmental engineering. He is Professor Emeritus at the University of Western Ontario (UWO), a Professional Engineer and a Designated Consulting Engineer (1995-2000). Professor Dr. Kosaric studied chemical engineering in Zagreb, Croatia, worked as an engineer in Bosnia and Croatia for 10 years and then immigrated to Canada. He enrolled as a Ph. D. student in Biochemistry in the Faculty of Medicine at UWO in London and finished his Ph. D. in only three years and was offered an Assistant Professor appointment at the UWO faculty of Engineering. During his 25 years of teaching at UWO he taught biochemical engineering, industrial processes, water pollution, design of industrial waste treatment facilities and food engineering. His research resulted in more than 370 research papers, 212 of which were published in referred scientific journals, 158 Proceedings in Scientific Conferences and 10 Books written and edited. Prof. Dr. Kosaric has been the Chief supervisor of 62 industrial bio-energy and environmental design projects and has been the Chief Supervisor of 39 Masters and Ph.D. Graduate Theses. Specific research projects included the areas of hydrogen and biofuels, biosufactants and design of water treatment processes. In the area of environmental biotechnology there have been industry and government funded projects in microbial hydrogen production, microbial enhanced oil recovery, microbial de-emulsification, bio-ethanol production, novel processes for biogas production, industrial waste recycle and many others. In addition to teaching and research, he also organized and chaired many scientific conferences! , symposia and workshops in Canada, USA, Europe, Brazil, Bahra! in, and Turkey. Professor Dr. Kosaric has collaborated with leading scientific institutions in Switzerland, Germany, Brazil, Slovenia, Turkey, Bahrain and Austria. He has been involved with scientific conferences on virtually every continent in the world. Professor Dr. Naim Kosaric is currently the President and CEO of Kayplan Engineering Consultants.
Specialty Fields:
â ¢ Environmental Biotechnology and Ecology
â ¢ Sustainable and Renewable Energy
â ¢ Biofuels (ethanol, biogas, hydrogen) and Specialty Products
â ¢ Industrial and Municipal Wastewater Management
â ¢ Design of Wastewater Treatment Processes
â ¢ Biosurfactants Production and Application
â ¢ Soil Bioremediation and Biodegradation of Toxic Pollutants
â ¢ Petroleum Biotechnology and Microbial Enhanced Oil Recovery
â ¢ Industrial Waste Recycle and Utilization
Membership Held in Scientific and Professional Societies:
â ¢ American Institute of Chemical Engineers
â ¢ American Chemical Society
â ¢ Canadian Institute of Food Science and Technology
â ¢ Nutrition Society of Canada
â ¢ International Association of Water Pollution Research
â ¢ Canadian Association on Water Quality
â ¢ American Oil Chemists Society
â ¢ Canadian Society of Chemical Engineering
â ¢ The Chemical Institute of Canada
â ¢ New York Academy of Sciences
â ¢ American Association for the Advancement of Science
Honors and Awards:
Collip Medal Recipient 1970 â Most meritorious Ph. D. Thesis at Faculty of Medicine, University of Western Ontario, Canada. Biomaxx Systems Inc.â s corporate mandate is to promote clean, efficient and safe energy alternatives and to reduce emissions and control green house gas emissions for the Global alternative fuel markets.
|
Swiss inventors develop transcriptionally silenced plant genes
ALEXANDRIA, Va., - Andrea Steimer of Zurich, Switzerland, Ortrun Mittelsten Scheid of Basel, Switzerland, and Jerzy Paszkowski of Nenzlingen, Switzerland, have developed transcriptionally silenced plant genes.
According to the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office: "The invention relates to gene silencing as observed after integration of transgenes into plant genomes.
Comparison of transcriptional gene expression between an Arabidopsis line carrying a silent transgene present in multiple copies and its mutant derivative momi impaired in silencing of the transgene revealed two complementary deoxyribonucleic acid clones which are expressed in the mutant plants, but not in the parental and not in wild type plants. Both clones are derived from the same family of transcripts referred to as transcriptionally silent information (TSI)."
An abstract of the invention, released by the Patent Office, said: "Genomic templates encoding TSI are repetitive elements with mainly pericentromeric location and conserved organization among various ecotypes. Transcriptional silencing of the genomic TSI templates is specifically released in the mutant. Transcription of TSI can be used as a marker to identify a defective silencing pathway in a plant."
The inventors were issued U.S. Patent No. 7,005,263 on Feb. 28.
The patent has been assigned to Syngenta Participations AG, Basel.
|
Trans fat battle drives demand for niche soybean
By Julie Ingwersen
ANAHEIM, California - Seed developers expect a big expansion this year in U.S. plantings of low-linolenic soybeans, which produce a soybean oil with less trans fat, company officials said on Thursday.
Food companies are driving demand for the specialty soyoil as they strive to reduce artery-clogging trans fats from their products. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration on Jan. 1 required food makers to list the amount of trans fats on ingredient labels.
Biotech giant Monsanto Co. has projected that farmers will plant its Vistive brand of low-linolenic soybeans on 400,000 to 500,000 acres this spring, up from 100,000 in 2005.
DuPont Co.'s seed unit, Pioneer, has developed a similar soybean variety that will be planted on 200,000 acres in 2006, Pioneer spokesman Jerry Harrington said. DuPont and Bunge Ltd. have formed a joint venture to produce a low-linolenic soyoil from those soybeans called Nutrium.
Pioneer has projected U.S. 2007 seedings at 550,000 acres, up from 35,000 in 2005, the variety's first year.
The total for 2006 amounts to only about 1 percent of the roughly 70 million U.S. acres planted to soybeans each year. But growth is likely as seedmakers add varieties for wider geographic distribution and enable more soy processing plants to produce low-linolenic oil.
The market for the specialty beans got a boost in December when Kellogg Co. said it would use the Vistive and Nutrium products to lower trans fats in some of its foods, such as Pop Tarts and Cheez-It crackers.
The announcement might have generated even more seedings of low-linolenic soybeans had it come earlier in the year, when seed makers decide what to produce for the following spring.
"The perfect timing is June-JuIy-August, when all these seed companies have their dealers in a room to lay out plans," said Wendell Knehans, a seed marketer with Monsanto.
"One of my challenges is to get the food companies to understand that committing early is really important," he said on the sidelines of the Commodity Classic, an agricultural industry conference.
Farmers grow the soybeans under contract, earning a premium of 25 to 40 cents per bushel over conventional varieties. They have to segregate the crop from other soybeans, as do the soy processors who crush the beans into soyoil and soymeal. Researchers used conventional breeding to bring out the genetic trait for low-linolenic acid in soybeans some 20 years ago, Knehans said, but there was not much demand for the varieties until recently.
Monsanto and Pioneer took the trait and added it into modern soybean varieties that have been genetically modified to resist herbicides, which are popular among farmers.
|
Heart Failure in People, Pets Focus of Collaboration
Three University of Guelph scientists studying a fatal disease in Doberman pinschers hope their work will help lead to better diagnostic and treatment options for human and canine heart patients.
Professors John Dawson, Glen Pyle and Lynne O’Sullivan are hunting down genetic mutations that cause “weak heart” or dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). It’s the second leading cause of heart failure in dogs and strikes up to one-half of Dobermans.
Learning what causes the disease in dogs may provide clues to causes and treatment of congestive heart failure, which afflicts more than 350,000 Canadians and is the fastest-growing cardiovascular condition in aging populations worldwide, the researchers say.
“We’re focusing specifically on DCM mutations, but information from that would tell us why hearts become diseased and why people and animals die,” said Pyle, of the Department of Biomedical Sciences in the Ontario Veterinary College (OVC).
DCM affects middle-aged to older Dobermans and usually kills about 140 days on average after the onset of congestive heart failure. Currently, dogs show no sign of a problem until very late in the disease. In people, heart failure is the most common cause of hospitalization and also leads to rapid and terminal decline. Between 25 and 40 per cent of Canadians die within a year of diagnosis.
In congestive heart failure, the weakened heart muscle is unable to pump blood around the body. What causes that weakening is unknown, although the researchers suspect something goes wrong with the proteins in the muscle, causing the heart muscle to weaken and allowing the organ to dilate like an overfilled balloon. In addition, the disease causes cells to malfunction even as they appear normal from the outside.
For their pilot study, the professors plan to study heart tissue from dogs that have died of DCM. They’ll comb through the animals’ genetic material to look for mutations. They hope to find particular genes that code for mutant structural or regulatory proteins.
The researchers expect their work will ultimately benefit both veterinarians and medical doctors. Vet researchers may be able to develop a diagnostic test to see whether a particular animal carries a mutation or come up with more effective drugs to treat it. “For dogs, it would be a simple way to detect the genetic markers of the disease,” said Dawson, of the Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology.
O’Sullivan, a professor in OVC’s Department of Clinical Studies, added that about one-third of human DCM cases are hereditary and probably all cases in purebreds like Dobermans are also genetic. She says information from their work may help breeders check dogs before mating.
The researchers expect their animal model may help doctors learn more about causes of heart disease in humans and how to treat it. Their work is supported by OVC’s Pet Trust.
All of the professors say their new cross-campus collaboration demonstrates Guelph’s strengths across biological sciences. “We are able to follow from genes to the whole animal among the three of us,” Pyle said.
|
Report: Regulatory Obstacles Thwarting Biotechnology
Canada will have to change the way it regulates scientific advances if it’s to benefit economically and socially from biotechnology innovation, according to a new report by a University of Guelph professor.
“Federal and provincial government agencies have made a concerted effort to increase support for biology,” said philosophy professor David Castle, the study’s lead author. “But biotechnology innovation continues to outpace the development of the regulations necessary for product approvals. This problem is highlighted when new biotech products straddle different regulatory authorities.”
The report, “Convergence in Biotechnology Innovation: Case Studies and Implications for Regulation,” was researched and written at the University of Guelph. It is part of an initiative of the Program on Applied Ethics and Biotechnology at the University of Toronto’s Joint Centre for Bioethics and is supported by the Ontario Research and Development Challenge Fund, the Ontario Genomics Institute and Genome Canada.
Released Feb 15, 2006, the report is posted on the project’s website. The researchers also sent it to the nation’s major regulatory agencies and are inviting officials, industry professionals, patent groups, researchers and individuals to respond with their views and concerns.
“The intent of this report was to consider whether a growing trend in biotechnology that we call ‘convergent’ technology can be handled within the existing regulatory system,” Castle said. “We have identified gaps and obstacles in the regulatory system and have recommended changes in how biotechnology regulation should be governed.”
The report focussed on three novel biotechnology innovations and, in each case, found significant regulatory stumbling blocks. Researchers looked at nutrigenomics, the field of personalized nutrition based on the study of the interaction between nutrients and genes; plant-derived vaccines, the production of vaccines for humans in crop plants; and the Enviropig, a line of pigs genetically modified so their bodies can absorb a normally indigestible form of phosphorus.
The report identifies the regulatory obstacles affecting the three technologies and makes specific recommendations for change. It also proposes overall suggestions for national reform, including establishing new regulatory concepts, definitions, standards, processes and structures.
“This report confirms that there are obstacles in the way of the effective adaptation of the regulatory system of convergent technologies,” Castle said. “Our hope is that the findings will lead to regulatory reform and migratory steps toward new models for governing biotechnology regulation.”
|
U.S. Patent Office grants another patent to Victhom - Another step forward in the fast growing neurostimulation market
QUEBEC, - Victhom Human Bionics Inc. (TSX:VHB) announced that the United States Patent Office (USPTO) has granted patent number 6,996,435 entitled Implantable signal amplifying circuit for electroneurographic recording. This invention is a significant technology advancement in the field of neurostimulation and more specifically in neurosensing. None of the proposed 17 claims has been challenged and Victhom considers that this patent combined with Victhom's already issued patents associated with the NeuroCuff(TM) will constitute the basis of Victhom's Neurotechnology platform: the Bionic Closed Loop System (Bionic CLS).
Abstract of the granted patent
An implantable microvolt-level signal amplifying circuit is used for
measuring electrical signals generated by nerves in the presence of larger
amplitude signals generated by muscles, the heart, or noise sources internal
to the human body. The circuit has a low-noise, high Common Mode Rejection
Ratio (CMRR) preamplifier, followed by a cascade of stages, which provide
filtering and further amplification of the neural signal. The band-pass
amplifying circuit can also present high Power Supply Rejection Ratio (PSRR).
The output is offset-compensated by a DC restoration stage and the circuit may
be incorporated onto a monolithic circuit with follow-up circuitry for
controlling Stimulation devices.
"Our strategy is to bring to the neurotech market the world's first
Closed Loop System to restore various pathologies of the peripheral nervous
system. CLS is a measurement-sensing interactive technology that could be
applied to diversified vertical markets such as cardiac, incontinence, obesity
control, sleep apnea and chronic pain, just to name a few. We believe that
this fast growing market will recognize the uniqueness and the value of
Victhom in the mid term" said Benoit Côte, President and Chief Executive
Officer of Victhom.
"This low-noise amplifier is one of the most important components of any
neuro-sensing device. It ensures the measurement of the neuronal activity of
any peripheral nerves with the necessary signal-to-noise ratio so that the
amplifier can be used at a commercial level." said Stéphane Bédard, Founder,
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer. This year, Victhom
expects to be granted additional new patents and continue to support its
development with the filing of application patents, for the fields of
neuromodulation and stimulation and neurosensing and monitoring, amongst
others.
|
Can tobacco plant stub out terror threat?
The nightmare scenario of terrorists adding lethal toxins to water supplies could be countered by synthesising antidotes in genetically modified plants.
Christopher Hall and his colleagues at the University of Guelph in Ontario, Canada, have equipped tobacco plants with an extra gene to make antibody fragments against botulinum A, which is produced by Clostridium botulinum bacteria and is one of the world's most potent toxins.
Just 1 to 2 hectares planted with the tobacco would yield enough antibody to treat 1 million people, says Hall, whose team's results are published online in Vaccine (DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.11.014).
But for an antidote to be truly effective, it would also have to neutralise the six other botulinum toxins produced by C. botulinum.
Hall is confident this is feasible. Even if each antibody had to be produced in different strains of tobacco, the farmland needed to produce large antidote stockpiles would be small compared with traditional tobacco production, for which there is already a shrinking market.
From issue 2533 of New Scientist magazine, 07 January 2006
|
Major breakthrough expected with sperm-sexing technology
Associated Press -A Toronto-based company, Microbix Biosystems Inc., has acquired proprietary sperm-sexing technology and has begun to develop the technology for commercialization. The technology allows farmers to determine the sex of commercial animals at an affordable price. The process is based on a technique that "clumps" female semen or male semen.
The nonclumped, free-swimming sexed semen can then be siphoned off and used for artificial insemination. Previously, producing male or female semen required the invasive measures of sperm nuclear staining and sorting semen one by one.
This new process is expected to be less expensive and more rapid to complete, according to Microbix officials. Microbix expects to complete a three-year research-and-development phase with a market launch in 2008. The process has already been patented in the United States and Europe.
Dairy producers have used artificial insemination for almost 50 years, and the new technology would likely allow producers to purchase AI straws with 96-98 percent female or male semen. Currently, dairy farmers breed for replacement heifers, but half of the time, bull calves are born.
This technology would allow producers to select female semen for inseminating the top cows in their herd. Cows with less-profitable milking herd traits could be bred using male semen to raise quality steers.
Dr. Stan Blecher, a molecular biologist and medical geneticist at the University of Guelph, Toronto, Ontario, invented the clumping technique, called sperm-sexing technology. By identifying sex-specific differences on the surface of sperm, Blecher was able to use those differences to clump the sperm of the "undesired" sex.
The proprietary process does not include genetic modification and is noninvasive. Microbix officials do not believe the technology should require regulatory approval.
|
Pay By Touch and NCR Announce Strategic Alliance to Provide
Complete Biometric Service to Merchants Around the World
-Agreement allows turnkey solution for quick and convenient implementation of fastest-growing consumer biometric payment service
SAN FRANCISCO and ATLANTA Pay By Touch and NCR Corporation have announced an alliance that combines both companies’ hardware and software solutions to offer merchants around the world a single point of contact for supporting their entire merchant and consumer biometric needs.
Using NCR’s biometric-enabled point-of-sale (POS) solutions, retailers everywhere can readily use the Pay By Touch authentication and payment service, giving shoppers a convenient and secure ability to pay for goods with the touch of a finger.
Under the companies’ agreement, retailers using NCR’s Advanced Checkout Solution (ACS) POS software and the WinEPS solution from MTXEPS, Inc. can readily implement the Pay By Touch services. The companies’ first joint implementation is being rolled out in select grocery stores throughout the U.S. Midwest. In addition, the NCR FastLane self-checkout solution is currently “Pay By Touch-Ready,” and integration with other NCR solutions is underway.
Enrollment Kiosks from NCR
Pay By Touch will also leverage an NCR self-service kiosk solution to streamline and enhance the Pay By Touch consumer enrollment process. Featuring NCR EasyPoint kiosk technology and software developed by NCR in conjunction with Pay By Touch, the kiosks increase convenience for shoppers to enroll, activate and maintain their Pay By Touch electronic wallets. Pay By Touch will offer the kiosks to its customers under a reseller agreement with NCR. The kiosks are currently being installed by a top-ten U.S. grocery chain.
Ultimately, the NCR and Pay by Touch alliance will help increase the adoption of consumer biometric authentication and payment processing around the world. Besides grocery retailers, the companies are developing solutions for the general merchandise retailing, food service and health care industries.
“Consumer demands for convenience are growing at an unprecedented pace, and retailers of all sizes need a fast, simple and secure solution that provides the ultimate customer service,” said Stephen Reade, senior vice president-product of Pay By Touch. “Our alliance with NCR addresses these needs with a fully integrated solution that improves the checkout experience and merchants’ top and bottom lines while also positioning our services for expansion into other vertical markets.”
“Thanks to this alliance, the thousands of stores using NCR solutions from independents to national chains can readily implement the Pay By Touch service to enhance the customer shopping experience while fighting the high cost of fraud and safeguarding against identity theft,” said NCR Assisted Service Solutions Vice President Greg Egan. “We’re excited to be part of a service that will ultimately change the way we pay for things everywhere.”
Shoppers can use Pay By Touch after a quick one-time sign up online at www.paybytouch.com, or at an enrollment kiosk in a participating store. Shoppers simply include their existing financial accounts and loyalty to create an electronic wallet accessed by a simple finger-scan at the point of sale. Each participating merchant decides which types of payment accounts they will accept from the Pay By Touch wallet. The Pay By Touch service is highly secure because of the uniqueness of the finger scan and because all data is encrypted and stored at secure data centers.
To date, the Pay By Touch consumer biometric payment solution has been deployed in major retailers throughout North America and the United Kingdom. Pay By Touch plans to launch in additional national and international retail chains later this year.
|
PEPID Brings Big Technology Features to the Small Screen - Healthcare professionals and students now have high-resolution visual resources at their fingertips
SKOKIE, IL - PEPID LLC developer of #1 rated medical/drug information and decision-support tools - announced today that the latest version of its medical information software will include nearly 100 high-resolution images including anatomical illustrations and enhanced rhythm strips. Now healthcare professionals and students, using their PDAs or PEPID Online, will have high-resolution visual resources at their fingertips.
“Our team of clinicians reviewed a wide range of potential anatomy subjects, before selecting which ones to illustrate,” says Dr. Mark Rosenbloom, PEPID Founder and CEO. “As with all PEPID content, we chose illustrations based on their immediate and direct clinical relevance. Every illustration in the new Clinical Anatomy Module is a visual reference clinicians will use.”
The new illustrations and enhanced rhythm strips are a result of PEPID’s ongoing commitment to support PDAs, and other small screen devices, with the highest quality content possible. “This is just the first in a planned series of illustration portfolios that will eventually cover the entire skeleton…muscles, tendons, ligaments, bursa, arteries, veins, nerves; the brain and body organs,” adds Rosenbloom. “Important anatomic pathology will be integrated throughout the text, as we further develop this unique resource. As always, we welcome feedback from our users about what they’d like to see in future releases.”
The new images are available in all PEPID software suites, versions 6.3 and higher, for physicians, nurses, students, and paramedics. They are designed to take advantage of newer high resolution, high capacity devices, but will be viewable by older devices with sufficient memory.
“The addition of illustrations and high resolution images greatly enhances the value of PEPID Suites to all of our users,” says PEPID President John Wagner. “Professionals will discover that our rhythm strips have been enhanced to near-diagnostic image quality and that they are well integrated into related content. Students will find these new resources handy in study and classroom, as well as clinical settings.”
|
Changed perception of Users in Nanotechnology, the market promises to grow by $1 trillion.
After undertaking a survey, it was found that overall there was a negative feeling towards nanotechnology. The reason was based on two experiences: unease about nanoparticles in cosmetics and a deeper unhappiness in using the technology in military enhancement.
However, nanotechnology industry is poised to grow to a trillion dollar by 2015. The responsibility of building a trust therefore, lies with the federal government and industry when they go about developing new nano applications.
According to a recent market research report, "The World Nanotechnology Market 2005" prepared by RNCOS, experts say that two thirds of the people all over the world who are aware of developments in this nascent science of nanotechnology agreed on its potential benefits in health and medicine, national defense, and environment sectors. Those who did not see favorably towards nanotechnology needed to be convinced that the supervision of the government would be swift, rigorous, and independent of external intervention. People want that both government and industry should check and improve trust.
Since nanotechnology is far smaller than micro-tech, there are immense possibilities of nanotech applications with ever new properties. The growth being rapid and enormous, this technology is emerging as a contender for MEMs in many areas.
|
| SANGOMA TECHNOLOGIES NEW “A104d” CARD PROVIDES MAJOR SOLUTION FOR BICOM SYSTEMS
New card with hardware- based echo cancellation and voice enhancement configured automatically “right out of the gate”
TORONTO Sangoma Technologies Corporation, a leading provider of connectivity hardware and software products for VoIP, TDM voice, WANs and Internet infrastructure, has provided a significant technical interoperability need for Bicom Systems' SWITCHware solution.
“For a recent client, we needed to deploy an entire broadband telephone solution,” says Stephen Wingfield, CEO of Bicom Systems, a London, UK- based VoIP solutions provider. “Sangoma's newly released A104d Series gateway of cards were a key component to our SWITCHware solution and worked “right out of the gate” with little configuration.”
“We had confidence that our A104d had the technical capability to provide Bicom System's with immediate ease of installation, quality of service and reliability,” adds Sangoma Technologies President and CEO David Mandelstam. “We are pleased now to be placed on their preferred Hardware Providers List for future projects needing our horsepower.”
The A104d includes a miniature voice enhancement sandwich board. The voice enhancement capabilities added to Sangoma's standard AFT-based A104 card include: G.168-2002 echo cancellation with 1024 tap/128ms tail per channel on all channel densities, DMF encoding/decoding and tone recognition, voice quality enhancement and adaptive noise reduction.
“Designed at Sangoma's research and development labs, the A104d PCI card is engineered for today's demanding soft PBX, IVR and VoIP applications, such as Asterisk, Yate, and OPAL, offering a new price/performance standard unparalleled in our industry,” says Mandelstam.
|
Soconag Environmental Experts Received C$4.5M Financing from Brookfield Technology Fund
Stephen A. Adams, Marc-Antoine Pelletier (From left to right)
MONTREAL, QUEBEC- - Soconag Environmental Experts, Inc. announced today that it has received $4.5 million in financing from Brookfield Technology Fund (BTF), a specialist investment fund established by Brookfield Asset Management (formerly Brascan Asset Management) to invest in early stage, technology based companies with high growth potential. Soconag and its SmartSoil Energy subsidiary, which transform "problem biomass" into clean gaseous fuel, primarily through landfill-gas-to-energy initiatives, will use the funding as working capital to expand their capacity to deliver patented biomass-to-energy technology solutions to their growing customer base in Canada, Mexico and Brazil.
Commented Marc-Antoine Pelletier, President and CEO of Soconag and SmartSoil Energy, "This new financing from the Brookfield Technology Fund, represents a significant vote of confidence in our expertise and strategic direction. We are excited by the opportunity to partner with BTF to triple our current project pipeline in the next five years from our current 20 megawatts of clean energy production and to contribute in a meaningful way to the production of clean energy and the reduction in greenhouse emissions." Soconag Environmental Experts, Inc. creates strategic and financial partnerships for the development and delivery of clean renewable biofuel technologies, such as with its SmartSoil Energy Inc. subsidiary with the commercial offering of its SmartSoil Biogas System and the BioFuelCell.
|
Viropro Inc. and NRC's Biotechnology Research Institute Sign a Scientific and Technological Agreement in Principle
MONTREAL - Viropro Inc. (OTCBB:VPRO) and the Biotechnology Research Institute of the National Research Council Canada
(NRC-BRI) are pleased to announce the ratification of an agreement in principle for the development and updating of production procedures for biopharmaceutical products, other biological materials as well as projects for business development.
The aim of this agreement is to create, within different research projects, a synergy of expertise and of technology transfers ranging from the early stage of preculture to the fine-tuning of production and purification procedures. The marketing of recombinant proteins and a new vaccination platform are at the core of the business strategy behind this alliance.
"We are very happy about this collaboration with the NRC-BRI as part of our business development strategy for biopharmaceutical products. We will give precedence to co-development agreements for procedures used in the manufacturing of biopharmaceutical products with the intention of technological transfers with our business partners in the areas targeted by Viropro," said Dr. Jean-Marie Dupuy, Chief Executive Officer of Viropro.
"We are very pleased with this agreement with Viropro because of its dynamic and proactive approach and we feel confident that we will succeed in finding new technological manufacturing approaches," said Dr. Michel Desrochers, General Manager of the NRC-BRI.
|
Minister Fontana Announces Support for Development of Anti-Inflammatory Therapies
LONDON, Ontario, October 12, 2005 -- The Honourable Joe Fontana, Minister of Labour and Housing, on behalf of the Honourable David L. Emerson, Minister of Industry, announced a $4.9-million investment in the development of novel drug platforms to treat serious inflammatory-based diseases.
Viron Therapeutics Inc., based in London, Ontario, is the recipient of this Technology Partnerships Canada (TPC) investment. The investment is part of a broader $16.5-million program being undertaken by Viron to develop novel anti-inflammatory drugs and will enable the company to develop two key compounds to treat acute coronary syndromes, rheumatoid arthritis, and organ failure in transplant patients.
"The Government of Canada understands the need to support researchers as they forge ahead toward ground-breaking discoveries," said Minister Emerson. "This project promises a range of benefits -- the most poignant of which is the potential to dramatically improve the quality of life and health of so many Canadians."
"This project is a perfect example of the benefits of innovation for Canadians," added Minister Fontana. "From improving the health of Canadians and our health care system, to creating high quality jobs and boosting our economy, innovative R&D is vital to our way of life."
Viron is a leader in the development of viral proteins to treat inflammation and has developed a group of compounds that have shown remarkable progress in being able to inhibit or interfere with abnormal inflammatory responses that cause disease. Viron's lead compound has just entered Phase 2 clinical trials to treat patients suffering from heart disease.
"We value this investment as it brings us much closer to being able to more effectively treat such debilitating diseases as heart attack and arthritis," said Neil K. Warma, President and CEO of Viron Therapeutics Inc. "By treating the underlying inflammation that is the cause of many of these conditions, these potent anti-inflammatories could change how we treat many diseases."
Advancement of Viron's viral protein technology could have a major positive impact on the Canadian health care system by reducing both the direct and indirect costs associated with hospitalization, rehabilitation, short- and long-term disability, and death. More importantly, it could dramatically improve the lives of patients with diseases that are currently inadequately treated by existing medications.
Technology Partnerships Canada (TPC) is a key instrument for advancing research and development toward commercialization. Working in | |