Contact
Tel 519.886.2831
Advertising Inquires
Feedback
Subscribe to Exchange Magazine
Daily News
Visitor Events
Stock Reports
Weather
Department
Index

Agribiz
Associations
A/V Cast
Biotech
Book Reviews
Construction
Economy
Education
Energy
Entrepreneurship
Environment
Financial
Government
Health Care
Human Resources
Immigration
Legal
Lifestyles
Manufacturing
Marketing
Media
Philanthropy
Research Reports
Retail
Technology
Tourism
Transportation
World News

2006 Archive
Economy
Jan 1 - March 27
Mar 27 - April 11
April 12 - May 15
ECONOMY
Continued financial volatility and weaker economic times ahead, say TD economists

- Cooling in U.S. housing markets foretells an imminent U.S. economic slowdown

- Softening in U.S. demand will dampen economic growth globally and in Canada

- Weaker U.S. economy will impact financial markets, leading to a decline in bond yields and commodity prices, as well as slower corporate profit growth

- Canadian economic growth to average 2.5 per cent over the next year

- However, the North American economic slowdown will prove short lived, lasting about one year, reflecting healthy underlying economic fundamentals of low unemployment, modest interest rates and subdued inflation

- Volatility will be a dominant theme in financial markets as the economies weaken over the next few quarters and then gradually recover in 2007

TORONTO- There is clear evidence that a U.S. economic slowdown is unfolding, which will dampen global economic growth, pose a negative shock to the Canadian economy and disrupt financial markets said TD economists in the June 14 issue of the TD Quarterly Economic Forecast. The report is available on the TD Economics website, at
www.td.com/economics.

"While high-flying energy prices and the lagged impact of Fed rate hikes will play a role in the U.S. economic slowdown, the main catalyst will be a cooling U.S. housing market and a diminution of the powerful real estate wealth effects that have been driving consumer spending in recent years," remarked Don Drummond, Senior Vice President and Chief Economist of TD Bank Financial Group. Existing and new home sales have already pulled back from their peaks, inventories of unsold homes are on the rise and mortgage refinancing has diminished. "These trends are all expected to continue in the months ahead, which will place downward pressure on home prices and lead to softer consumer spending, particularly on big-ticket and luxury items," stated Drummond.

However, TD Economics anticipates a soft-landing in U.S. real estate. While certain dramatically overheated markets, such as that of California, could see significant price declines, the national average home price is forecast to only slow to a flat, or slightly negative, year-over-year rate. Even with this relatively benign outcome, U.S. economic growth is projected to drop towards a two per cent annual pace in late 2006 and early 2007.

The U.S. economic outlook has far ranging implications. "The Fed may hike rates again in late June, but that should be the last rate increase and the central bank is likely to be easing policy by the end of 2006 and early 2007," noted Drummond. This suggests that bond yields will retreat and the U.S. dollar weaken. The economic backdrop for equities will be challenging as corporate profit growth slows.

The slowdown in the world's largest economy will have global implications, with world real GDP growth dropping from 4.6 per cent in 2006 to 4.0 per cent in 2007. This foretells weaker global profit growth, which could sour investor appetite for equities, particularly in emerging markets that tend to experience extreme volatility. The softening in U.S. demand will also limit any further tightening in monetary policy by central banks overseas. "A slowdown in the world's largest economy will impact commodity markets negatively. We think prices will pullback by 10 per cent over the next twelve months, with the bulk of the adjustment coming from a more than 20 per cent decline in prices for crude oil and base metals," remarked Drummond.

The Canadian economy and Canadian financial markets will be buffeted by the above-mentioned trends. "The fallout from a weaker U.S. economy will be borne principally by exporters," stated Drummond. TD Economics also expects Canadian housing markets and consumer spending to moderate at the same time that exporters are struggling with diminishing U.S. demand. After expanding at close to a three per cent pace in recent years and by 3.8 per cent in the first quarter of 2006, Canadian economic growth will slip to around 2.5 per cent in the fourth quarter of 2006. However, this implies that the Canadian slowdown will be less pronounced than in the United States. The aggregate picture also masks wildly different regional trends across Canada. "Even with the expected correction in raw material prices, the high level of prices means that commodity-rich provinces (Alberta, B.C., Saskatchewan and Newfoundland & Labrador) will continue to experience robust economic growth, while central Canada will underperform the national average," commented Drummond.

"Although employment growth has surprised on the upside in recent months, the weaker economic growth ahead is likely to keep the Bank of Canada on the sidelines and there is a good chance that the monetary authority will deliver rate cuts towards the end of the year or in early 2007," added Drummond. Canadian bonds are forecast to rally in the second half of 2006, but still underperform their U.S. counterparts, resulting in narrowing negative spreads. TD Economics believes that the Canadian dollar has scope to strengthen in the near term on U.S. dollar weakness, but as the full extent of the commodity price correction unfolds, the loonie will eventually retreat towards 85 U.S. cents. For Canadian equities, the economic environment will be challenging, with slowing corporate profit growth and a further decline in commodity prices.

"The dominant theme is weaker times ahead, but it is critical to keep this slowdown in perspective. The economies are only expected to experience a softer pace of expansion, not a hard landing," stressed Drummond. Slower economic growth will also help to keep inflation pressures in check. Unemployment rates may edge up slightly, but they will remain low. And, even though interest rates have risen, they will peak at historically modest levels. "Equities may struggle as corporate profit slows, but remember that the stock market has a long history of being a leading economic indicator. If the economies experience a soft landing, equities are likely to rally strongly in response to central bank rate cuts and once there is clear evidence that a hard landing will be avoided," noted Drummond.

"The main message is that consumers, businesses and investors should be braced for a period of economic and financial market volatility. However, the economic weakness is expected to pass relatively quickly," concluded Drummond.

Canadian international merchandise trade April 2006

Canada's merchandise exports fell in April for the third time in four months this year while imports continued to gain ground. As a result, the nation's merchandise trade surplus with the rest of the world dropped to its lowest level in six months.


After a modest gain in March, exports declined 2.3% to $37.1 billion. Imports registered their second consecutive gain this year, rising 1.2% to $33.1 billion.

That pushed Canada's merchandise trade surplus from a revised $5.3 billion in March down to $4.0 billion, its lowest level since January 2005.

Exports, which fell in April to almost all Canada's major trading partners, including the United States, were 8.4% lower than they were in December 2005. This year's slump follows a sharply rising trend that had started in November 2004. Between that point and December 2005, exports rose from $35.0 billion to $40.5 billion.

Imports from the United States remained virtually flat in April, while exports declined 1.5%. That narrowed Canada's trade surplus with the United States from $8.3 billion to $7.9 billion.

At the same time, our trade deficit with countries other than the United States increased from $3.0 billion to $3.8 billion.


Exports: Automotive products, machinery and equipment behind the decline

Exports rose in only two of seven export sectors in April — energy products and agricultural and fishing products.

The largest contributors to April's overall decline were automotive products, where exports fell 8.4%, and machinery and equipment, where they were down 3.2%.

Exports of automotive products had been rising since July 2005, reaching their most recent peak of $8.0 billion in January 2006. Sharp increases in fuel costs and finance costs have depressed demand for vehicles in both Canada and the United States. In April, light truck sales south of the border declined 7.7%.

Exports of passenger autos, the largest component of the automotive products sector, registered their third consecutive decline in April. Trucks and other motor vehicles, and motor vehicle parts have shown a generally declining trend since July 2005.

Exports of machinery and equipment, Canada's largest export sector, fell 3.2% to about $8.0 billion in April. The decline consisted primarily of a 7.7% drop in exports of industrial and agricultural machinery, and a 4.2% decrease in aircraft and other transportation equipment caused by a decline in aerospace production.

April's decrease in exports of machinery and equipment followed an upward trend that began in June 2003, hitting its most recent peak of $8.2 billion in March 2006.

Exports of forestry products fell 1.6% to just over $2.8 billion, the third consecutive monthly decline after reaching their most recent peak of $3.2 billion in January. Newsprint and other paper fell 3.4%, while exports of lumber and sawmill products slipped 2.1% in the wake of a decline in residential construction south of the border.

Industrial goods and materials edged down 0.3% to just over $7.2 billion. Growth in metals and alloys was offset by lower exports of chemicals, plastics and fertilizers, and other industrial goods.

Exports of industrial goods and materials had been on an upward trend since June 2003. The growth in metals and alloys in April was the result of gains in both prices and volume. Within the commodity group, both zinc and copper reached their highest levels since January 2000.

On the plus side, exports of agricultural and fishing products posted a second consecutive increase with a 1.2% gain in April. It was driven by a 36.7% surge in wheat exports. Agricultural and fishing products have been virtually flat since April 2002.

Energy products grew 1.5% to nearly $7.2 billion. Exports of crude petroleum grew 2.8%, while "other" energy products (including petroleum and coal products, and other bituminous substances, and electricity) were up by 13.5%.

On the other hand, exports of natural gas fell 7.4%, the result of a 5.7% decrease in prices and a 1.8% decline in volume. Record high inventory levels in the United States depressed demand as well as prices of natural gas. The energy products sector has shown a sharp declining trend since October 2005.

Imports: Energy products and automotive products drive most of the growth

Imports have been generally growing since September 2003. In April, four sectors (energy products, automotive products, agricultural and fishing products, and forestry products) registered growth.

This comes in the wake of 0.9% growth in Canada's real gross domestic product during the first three months of 2006.

Imports of energy products, which rose 14.1% from March, accounted for the vast majority (90%) of the net growth in total imports in April. Canadian companies imported more than $2.8 billion in energy products in April, following a period of sharp declines that have averaged 2.7% a month since November 2005.

April's increase in energy was the result of a 12.5% increase in volume and a 1.6% increase in prices. Imports of petroleum and coal products, and coal and other related products surged 36.2%, and crude petroleum gained 1.9%.

Companies imported nearly $6.7 billion in automotive products in April, up 2.8% from March, their second consecutive gain. This growth consisted of a 5.9% gain in imports of trucks and other motor vehicles, a 2.6% increase in imports of passenger autos, and a 1.5% rise in motor vehicle parts.

Imports of automotive products have been virtually flat since April 2004, as trucks and other motor vehicles, as well as passenger autos, have risen while motor vehicle parts have declined.

Agricultural and fishing products increased 1.0% to $1.9 billion, the second consecutive rise. The main contributors were increases in sugar and sugar preparations, beverages and tobacco. Imports of fruits and vegetables, which registered their third consecutive decline, were 4.1% lower than they were in January.

Industrial goods and materials edged down 0.3% in April, following a 4.1% gain in March. Chemicals and plastics explained most of the decline.

After an increase in March, machinery and equipment imports fell 3.2% in April with aircraft and other transportation equipment plunging 20.9%. This component accounted for over 98% of the net decline of the sector.

Industrial and agricultural machinery imports fell 2.8% while "other" machinery and equipment imports increased 1.7%.

Merchandise trade
  March 2006r April 2006 March to April 2006 April 2005 to April 2006 January to April 2005 January to April 2006 January–April 2005 to January–April 2006
  Seasonally adjusted, $ current
  $ millions % change $ millions % change
Principal trading partners              
Exports              
United States 30,236 29,783 -1.5 1.1 117,561 122,464 4.2
Japan 906 867 -4.3 3.6 3,325 3,420 2.9
European Union 2,823 2,457 -13.0 4.3 9,150 10,458 14.3
Other OECD countries1 1,352 1,367 1.1 12.7 4,560 5,310 16.4
All other countries 2,709 2,671 -1.4 10.7 9,647 10,526 9.1
Total 38,026 37,146 -2.3 2.4 144,243 152,179 5.5
Imports              
United States 21,897 21,827 -0.3 2.2 85,360 87,029 2.0
Japan 890 1,105 24.2 18.9 3,810 3,905 2.5
European Union 3,339 3,210 -3.9 4.5 12,506 13,220 5.7
Other OECD countries1 1,891 1,944 2.8 -8.6 7,990 7,513 -6.0
All other countries 4,672 4,990 6.8 22.2 16,863 19,458 15.4
Total 32,689 33,076 1.2 4.8 126,529 131,125 3.6
Balance              
United States 8,339 7,956 ... ... 32,201 35,435 ...
Japan 16 -238 ... ... -485 -485 ...
European Union -516 -753 ... ... -3,356 -2,762 ...
Other OECD countries1 -539 -577 ... ... -3,430 -2,203 ...
All other countries -1,963 -2,319 ... ... -7,216 -8,932 ...
Total 5,337 4,070 ... ... 17,714 21,054 ...
Principal commodity groupings              
Exports              
Agricultural and fishing products 2,630 2,662 1.2 8.5 9,761 10,537 8.0
Energy products 7,066 7,174 1.5 11.1 24,006 29,047 21.0
Forestry products 2,886 2,840 -1.6 -8.6 12,542 11,800 -5.9
Industrial goods and materials 7,275 7,250 -0.3 4.6 27,809 29,049 4.5
Machinery and equipment 8,217 7,952 -3.2 -0.6 31,228 31,851 2.0
Automotive products 7,262 6,650 -8.4 -1.6 28,435 29,159 2.5
Other consumer goods 1,447 1,393 -3.7 -2.2 5,775 5,675 -1.7
Special transactions trade2 731 666 -8.9 -0.7 2,666 2,900 8.8
Other balance of payments adjustments 512 557 8.8 15.8 2,020 2,157 6.8
Imports              
Agricultural and fishing products 1,877 1,895 1.0 3.3 7,312 7,577 3.6
Energy products 2,474 2,823 14.1 12.0 10,138 10,429 2.9
Forestry products 248 254 2.4 -3.4 1,056 1,009 -4.5
Industrial goods and materials 6,885 6,868 -0.2 6.4 26,127 27,420 4.9
Machinery and equipment 9,496 9,197 -3.1 1.7 35,838 37,446 4.5
Automotive products 6,519 6,699 2.8 2.7 25,778 26,287 2.0
Other consumer goods 4,261 4,226 -0.8 6.4 16,219 17,030 5.0
Special transactions trade2 338 492 45.6 46.0 1,601 1,521 -5.0
Other balance of payments adjustments 591 623 5.4 2.1 2,459 2,407 -2.1
...figures not appropriate or not applicable
rrevised
1.Includes Australia, Canada, Iceland, Mexico, New Zealand, Norway, South Korea, Switzerland and Turkey.
2.These are mainly low valued transactions, value of repairs to equipment, and goods returned to country of origin.

Note to readers

Merchandise trade is one component of the current account of Canada's balance of payments, which also includes trade in services.

Balance of payments data are available for the United States, Japan and the United Kingdom. Trade data for all other individual countries are available on a customs basis only.

Revisions

In general, merchandise trade data are revised on an ongoing basis for each month of the current year. Customs basis data are revised for the previous data year each quarter.

Factors influencing revisions include late receipt of import and export documentation, incorrect information on customs forms, replacement of estimates with actual figures, changes in classification of merchandise based on more current information, and changes to seasonal adjustment factors.

Revised data are available in the appropriate CANSIM tables.

New Housing Price Index April 2006

New home prices rose sharply in April. The New Housing Price Index rose by 1.2% over the previous month to 138.2 (1997=100). This was the most significant month-over-month increase at the national level since April 1989. Compared to one year ago, contractors' selling prices have increased 8.2%.

Prices advanced in 14 of the 21 metropolitan areas surveyed. Calgary led the way once again with a monthly increase of 4.7%. Edmonton (+3.9%) Regina (+1.2%), Montréal (+1.0%) and Vancouver (+0.9%) also registered significant increases. High demand for new housing, coupled with higher material and labour costs and increased land values, were cited as the main reasons for these increases.

Other noteworthy gains were registered in Hamilton, St. Catharines–Niagara and London (+0.6% each) where favourable market conditions, higher material and labour costs and increased land values pushed prices up. Monthly increases were also noted in Ottawa–Gatineau, Toronto and Oshawa, Greater Sudbury/Grand Sudbury and Thunder Bay, Winnipeg, Saskatoon and Victoria. Of the 14 metropolitan areas showing increases, land prices rose in 8.

Four metropolitan areas registered no monthly change while Windsor (-1.4%), Kitchener (-0.4%) and St. John's (-0.1%) posted the only decreases due to competitive pricing.

On a 12-month basis, Calgary (+34.8%) had the largest increase for new homes for the seventh month in a row, followed by Edmonton (+18.6%), Winnipeg (+10.7%), Regina and Victoria (+7.7% each) and Saskatoon (+6.7%).

New housing price indexes

(1997=100)

  April 2006 April 2005 to April 2006 March to April 2006
    % change
Canada total 138.2 8.2 1.2
House only 148.1 8.8 1.4
Land only 119.0 6.7 0.7
St. John's 127.6 3.2 -0.1
Halifax 129.7 6.5 0.0
Charlottetown 115.4 2.3 0.0
Saint John, Fredericton and Moncton 112.5 3.3 0.0
Québec 141.3 6.1 0.0
Montréal 147.0 4.2 1.0
Ottawa–Gatineau 157.3 3.3 0.4
Toronto and Oshawa 136.3 4.1 0.4
Hamilton 140.2 4.9 0.6
St. Catharines–Niagara 142.6 4.7 0.6
Kitchener 135.9 4.6 -0.4
London 132.1 4.9 0.6
Windsor 104.5 -0.5 -1.4
Greater SudburyGrand Sudbury and Thunder Bay 101.5 2.7 0.4
Winnipeg 142.2 10.7 0.2
Regina 151.7 7.7 1.2
Saskatoon 134.6 6.7 0.4
Calgary 192.3 34.8 4.7
Edmonton 159.1 18.6 3.9
Vancouver 110.9 6.1 0.9
Victoria 118.2 7.7 0.3
Note:View the census subdivisions that comprise the metropolitan areas online.

Canada 2020 Conference

Vice President Al Gore, Economist Jeffrey Sachs, among global experts and CEOs presenting, attending at Mont Tremblant June 13-15

JUNE 8, 2006 – The Canada 2020: Progressive Policies, Practical Solutions Conference is a non-partisan forum to identify key challenges and solutions to ensure Canada remains competitive and socially progressive in the 21st Century.

DATES AND TIMES:
June 13, 2006; 7 p.m. to 9 p.m.
June 14, 2006; 7:30 a.m. to 9 p.m.
June 15, 2006, 7:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.

PLACE:
Fairmont Tremblant Hotel
Mont Tremblant, Quebec

SESSIONS INCLUDE:

Social Cohesion in Urban Canada – Is the social strife in some large European urban centres lurking within urban Canada?

Fiscal Means and Needs: Striking the Right Balance – examining the fiscal capacities and demands of the three levels of government;

Ensuring Prosperity for Canada in 2020 – What must Canada do to secure prosperity and improve competitiveness of Canadian firms in the global economy? How do we “brand” Canada to attract foreign investment and world-leading talent?

Building more world leading Canadian Companies – how do we ensure that more Canadian companies are successful beyond our borders.

SPEAKERS AND PANELISTS INCLUDE:

Al Gore, former U.S. Vice-President
Jeffery Sachs, the Earth Institute
Lewis Lapham, Editor-in-Chief, Harper’s Magazine
Jacques Attali, Principal Advisor to former French President François Mitterand
Don Walker, Co-CEO, Magna
Kenneth Courtis, Director, Asia-Pacific Foundation
Paul Lavoie, Chairman and Chief Creative Officer, Taxi Inc.
Marcel Coté, Founder, Secor
Michael Adams, President, Environics
David Pecaut, Chair, Toronto City Summit Alliance
Andre Pratte, Editor-in-Chief, La Presse

The conference co-Chairs are: The Honourable John Manley, The Honourable Anne McLellan and François de Gaspé Beaubien, Chairman and CEO Zoom Media.

A full conference agenda is posted at:
http://www.canada2020.ca/files/Agenda2006-web.pdf.

Foreign control in the Canadian economy 2004

The share of foreign control in the Canadian corporate economy remained stable in 2004, despite strong growth in both assets and revenues of foreign-controlled corporations.

Foreign-controlled corporations accounted for 21.9% of assets held in Canada, and 30.0% of operating revenues. Despite the odd fluctuation, these shares have remained fairly stable ever since the post-recessionary period of the mid-1990s.


Assets of foreign-controlled corporations rose a healthy 8.3% to $1.1 trillion in 2004, while those of Canadian-controlled corporations jumped 8.9% to $3.9 trillion. This follows more moderate growth rates of 5.7% for Canadian-controlled corporations, and 1.5% for foreign-controlled corporations in 2003.

Foreign-controlled revenues increased 6.7% in 2004 to just shy of the $800-billion mark, nearly double the level of a decade earlier. The global boom in mergers and acquisitions activity during the 1990s contributed to this rapid increase.

Of the nearly 1.3 million corporations doing business in Canada in 2004, all but about 8,000 were Canadian-controlled. In other words, less than 1% were foreign-controlled, a proportion that has changed little over time.

However, foreign-controlled corporations tend to be much larger. In 2004, their operating revenues averaged $96 million, compared with less than $2 million for their Canadian-controlled counterparts.

Record profits for foreign-controlled firms

Foreign-controlled profits soared to a record $68 billion in 2004, up a staggering 21.7% from the previous year. Domestic-controlled profits also rose, although at a more moderate rate of 11.8%. Much of these gains, in both cases, came on the strength of the manufacturing sector, where profits rose 36.2%.

This was the second straight year that corporate profits were on the rise. Furthermore, in 2004, they hit an all-time high of $217 billion, eclipsing the old mark of $192 billion set in 2000.

Between 2002 and 2004, foreign-controlled corporations led the way with a 38.6% surge in profits, compared with a 22.4% gain for Canadian-controlled corporations.


Manufacturing on the rebound; oil and gas assets up

Manufacturing rebounded in 2004 from a weak performance the year before when the economy was hit by events such as forest fires and a power outage.

Operating revenues for manufacturers rose by $43.1 billion in 2004. Half that growth came from foreign-controlled corporations.

Manufacturing enjoyed a surge in profits, with foreign-controlled profits rising by $5.7 billion and those of Canadian-controlled corporations up by $6.2 billion. This is an industry which has 50.3% of its assets under foreign control.

Oil and gas was second only to manufacturing in terms of share of assets under foreign control. Foreign-controlled corporations accounted for 44.9% in 2004, and Canadian-controlled corporations 55.1%. Escalating oil prices and large investments in non-conventional oil sources have combined to boost Canada's energy sector, placing it among the world leaders.

In 2004, oil and gas assets rose by $34 billion, the equivalent of 13.5%, with the bulk of the increase occurring in the Canadian-controlled portfolio.

United States still by far the biggest foreign player

Among foreign-controlled corporations operating in Canada, the United States continued to be the dominant force by a wide margin. American-controlled firms held 61.0% of foreign-based assets and generated 62.6% of foreign-based revenues.

Well back of the United States were the United Kingdom, which accounted for 12.0% of foreign-based assets and 7.0% of foreign-based revenues, and Germany, with 6.5% of foreign-based assets and 6.9% of foreign-based revenues.

Despite this dominance, the United States has seen a decline in its share of revenues, particularly in the financial sector, in recent years.

In 2004, US-controlled corporations accounted for 45.0% of foreign-controlled revenues generated in the financial sector, a steep drop from 56.3% in 2002. On the plus side, corporations under British control and Dutch control recorded a gain in their shares.

Note to readers

The Corporations Returns Act is administered by the Chief Statistician of Canada under the authority of the Minister of Industry. The purpose of the Act is to collect financial and ownership information on corporations conducting business in Canada and to use this information to evaluate the extent and effect of non-resident control of the Canadian corporate economy.

The Act requires that an annual report be submitted to Parliament summarizing the extent to which foreign control is prevalent in Canada. The document being released today is that report for reference year 2004.

Asset-based measures of foreign control provide a longer-term perspective, reflecting economic decisions and market conditions that evolve more slowly over time. Revenue-based measures tend to reflect current business conditions and therefore, tend to be more volatile than asset-based measures. Both are of interest and both have been included in this report.

Canada Should Pursue Free Trade Agreement with India, says C.D. Howe Institute Study

Toronto — As India makes serious attempts to tackle its economic weaknesses and build on its strengths, Canada should be moving more quickly to deepen the bilateral economic relationship through a Free Trade Agreement (FTA), either in services or across the board, according to a C.D. Howe Institute Commentary released June 1, 2006. In The Indian Elephant Sheds its Past: The Implications for Canada, Wendy Dobson, Professor and Director, Institute for International Business, Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto, provides a realistic assessment of what’s really going on with India’s economy. Despite breathless accounts of India’s emergence as an economic colossus, the author finds that India is a land of contrasts.

Indian IT services firms are globally competitive but many manufacturers still seek protection from foreign competitors, she points out. Economic growth rates are speeding up but trade is still a small share of the world total. Logistics infrastructure is abysmal. And while India has the most mature and diverse financial system in the emerging market economies and many excellent universities, the government seeks to create 100 million industrial jobs in this decade to provide employment for its 400-million- strong work force, much of which is illiterate.

While Canada’s economic future will be determined mainly by its proximity to the United States, more could be made of the bilateral relationship with India, says the author. Canada and India share many of the same institutions and language of commerce because of their common colonial heritage. There is a sizeable Indian diaspora in Canada. Business ties will continue to grow, but incrementally, unless governments facilitate this mutual interest.

The study argues that Canada and India should consider negotiating a bilateral free trade agreement — either in services or across the board. A services FTA would C.D. Howe Institute Institut C.D. Howe raise the strategic potential of the relationship. The remarkable success of India’s IT services exporters all along the value chain should be exploited by large and small Canadian firms to increase their competitiveness and to move to higher-value-added activities in Canada. While Canada has few explicit barriers to importing IT services or to FDI inflows, Indian firms in Canada are constrained by the talent shortage in engineering and technical skills, by conservative attitudes towards using foreign service providers, and by government procurement practices.

She recommends that, since the bilateral economic relationship has been one of mutual disinterest until recently, the first step forward should be a full blown economic analysis by an independent Joint Study Group, a mechanism India has already employed with other potential trading partners.

The study The Indian Elephant Sheds its Past: The Implications for Canada, is available at
http://www.cdhowe.org/pdf/commentary_235.pdf
Canadian economic accounts First quarter 2006 and March 2006

Economic activity picked up in the first quarter as real gross domestic product (GDP) advanced 0.9% on the heels of continued strength in investment and personal expenditure. In March, monthly output edged up 0.1% from February.


Service-producing industries surged ahead as retail and wholesale trade, finance, insurance and real estate all advanced. Output of goods-producing industries inched ahead as manufacturers continued to battle the effects of the rapidly increasing Canadian dollar, and growing international competition. Exports declined slightly, mainly automotive, forestry and industrial goods.

Production declined in the mining, utilities and non-durable manufacturing sectors. In total, industrial production fell 0.3%. In the United States the index of industrial production rose 1.3%, bolstered by manufacturing and mining, while utilities receded.

A jump in household demand, particularly consumer spending on durables and housing, was behind most of the first quarter advance. Growth in final domestic demand matched the pace set in the fourth quarter and continued to outpace overall growth in GDP.

Real gross domestic product, chained (1997) dollars1
  Change Annualized change Year-over-year change
  %
First quarter 2005 0.6 2.2 3.2
Second quarter 2005 0.8 3.4 3.0
Third quarter 2005 0.8 3.2 2.7
Fourth quarter 2005 0.6 2.6 2.8
First quarter 2006 0.9 3.8 3.2
1.The change is the growth rate from one period to the next. The annualized change is the growth rate compounded annually. The year-over-year change is the growth rate of a given quarter compared with the same quarter in a previous year.

Economy-wide prices, as measured by the chain price index for GDP, fell 0.7% in the quarter. A large share of the decline was the result of falling energy prices. Economy-wide prices, excluding energy, increased 0.7%, a slight acceleration from the previous quarter.

The economy grew at an annualized rate of 3.8% in the first quarter, a sharp pickup from the 2.6% annualized pace set during the previous quarter. The US economy grew at an annualized rate of 5.3%.

Residential investment picked up following moderate growth in 2005

Investment in residential structures rebounded in the first quarter after stalling in the fourth quarter. The 3.4% first quarter increase was the strongest quarterly advance in more than two years. The value of new housing construction jumped, renovation activity remained strong and an active resale market all contributed to the strong growth.

Business investment in non-residential structures and machinery and equipment continued to climb in the first quarter, although at a slower pace than that of the last half of 2005.

Investment in non-residential structures grew by 1.8%. Investment in engineering projects slowed following two quarters of solid growth. Much of the growth over the last number of years has been in the red-hot oil and gas sector. Since 2002, engineering construction as a share of total investment in non-residential structures has risen from 67% to 71%.

Investment in machinery and equipment decelerated as expenditures in other transportation equipment slowed and telecommunications edged down following large increases in the last half of 2005.


Consumer spending accelerates

Consumers began 2006 much the same way they began 2005, by purchasing large amounts of durable and semi-durable goods. Expenditure on clothing and footwear, furniture and furnishings, household appliances and recreational, sporting and camping equipment all climbed well over 3%. All this activity pushed up output in the retail sector which advanced 2.0%. Personal expenditure by Canadians outside the country remained strong while spending by foreigners in Canada declined, driving up net expenditure abroad by 7%.

Spending on non-durable goods was essentially flat in the quarter as moderate growth in food, beverages and tobacco was more than offset by declines in purchases of energy related products such as motor fuels and lubricants. The warmer weather served to drive down consumption of natural gas and electricity, both of which fell for a second consecutive quarter.

Inventory buildup slows

A little more than $10 billion was added to inventories in the first quarter, down from the $15 billion buildup in the fourth. The bulk of this buildup was retail inventories which posted a second quarter of strong accumulation. This was offset by a large draw down in other non-farm inventories, specifically energy products. In the fourth quarter, imports of energy products jumped over 7%, oil and gas production climbed 3.5% while exports declined. The result was a large fourth quarter buildup in inventories. In the first quarter, the picture reversed as imports fell, production decelerated and exports rose, causing the large draw down.

Exports stall

Manufacturing output slowed to 0.1% in the first quarter, the result of declines in non-durable goods and transportation equipment manufacturing. Part of these declines has been attributable to weaker foreign demand, as exports stalled. Most commodity groups showed little growth or declined. Automotive exports, which increased over 15% in the last half of 2005, declined in the first quarter and exports of forestry products lost most of the gain they made in the fourth quarter.

Imports fell following two quarters of solid growth. Imports of energy products and machinery and equipment both declined. The quarterly decline in machinery and equipment imports is the first in three years. Imports of consumer goods advanced another 2.2%, on the heels of similar increases in the last two quarters of 2005.

Labour income pushes ahead, corporate profits falter on lower energy prices

Labour income advanced 1.2%, slightly off the 1.5% average quarterly increase registered in 2005. While service-producing industries were the source of strength for most of 2005, the goods-producing industries were behind most of the first quarter growth. Public administration wages and salaries stalled contributing to the weakness in service-producing industries, but educational services, health care and social assistance, posted first quarter increases. Growth in mining, construction and manufacturing helped boost growth in goods-producing industries.

Corporate profits fell 4.1%, the first significant quarterly decline since 2003, as lower export prices of energy goods put a lid on profits in the oil and gas sector. Excluding oil and gas extraction and refineries, profits posted a modest increase. Significant gains were registered in the real estate, rental and leasing, information and culture, and education and health industries.

GDP by industry: Highlights for March 2006

The Canadian economy edged up 0.1% in March, after increasing by 0.2% in January and by 0.3% in February. In March, growth in service-producing industries (+0.3%) more than offset a decline in the production of goods (-0.2%).

Monthly gross domestic product by industry at basic prices, chained 1997 dollars
  Oct. 2005r Nov. 2005r Dec. 2005r Jan. 2006r Feb. 2006r Mar. 2006p
  Seasonally adjusted
  Month-to-month % change
All industries 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.1
Goods-producing industries 0.4 -0.0 0.6 -0.5 0.5 -0.2
Service-producing industries 0.1 0.4 0.3 0.5 0.3 0.3
Industrial production 0.5 -0.1 0.7 -1.0 0.3 -0.1
Construction 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.1 -0.6
Retail trade 1.5 1.3 0.3 0.8 0.2 1.2
Energy sector 0.3 0.3 0.5 -3.0 2.0 1.1
rrevised
ppreliminary

Retail trade benefited from an upswing in activity among most retailers in March. New motor vehicle dealers were responsible for much of the 1.2% growth in this sector. Excluding new motor vehicle dealers, retail trade advanced 0.4%. Growth in wholesale trade was flat, held back by a reduction in motor vehicle exports.

Manufacturing output retreated 0.4% in March. Eleven of the 21 major groups, accounting for 54% of total manufacturing output, registered declines. A decrease in American demand for motor vehicles resulted in a sharp drop in motor vehicle manufacturing in Canada.

Construction declined 0.6% in March, taking a pause after growing steadily for 20 consecutive months. Residential construction declined 2.2%, wiping out the gain in February. Non-residential construction advanced 0.6%.


Buoyant stock markets continued to contribute to the growth of the financial sector (+0.3%). By contrast, real estate brokers registered a 1.6% decline, reflecting weakness in the home resale market.

Building on the previous month's strength, the energy sector advanced 1.1% in March. This gain has been largely attributable to a sharp increase in oil exploration (+13%) and to a rise in oil and gas extraction (+0.2%). Electricity generation and transmission declined 0.7%. Mining activity fell sharply (-4.6%), mostly due to a marked decline in potash production.

Study: How are Canadian regions adjusting to a larger, more integrated North American market? 1980 to 1999

All regions in Canada have benefited from North American economic integration, a new study shows.

The Canada-US Free Trade Agreement (FTA) and North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) provided Canada and all of its regions with better access to the large North American market.

The study found that all regions have benefited through improved productivity performance, higher wages and higher output growth. However, Ontario has been the principal beneficiary.

On the basis of the relationship between productivity growth and changes in trade integration, the study concluded that deepening trade integration with the United States increased multifactor productivity by 1.2% per year for manufacturing in Ontario from 1988 to 1999. In other regions, the impact was rather small. Trade integration lifted multifactor productivity in manufacturing by 0.4% a year for Quebec, 0.3% for Western Canada and 0.2% for Atlantic Canada.

(Multifactor productivity is a comprehensive measure of production efficiency. Its growth is measured as the increase in output minus the growth of combined inputs: labour and capital.)

Some of these productivity gains were passed on to workers in the form of higher wages. Workers in Ontario gained the most from increased trade integration, while the gains in other regions, although significant, were relatively small.

The study found that from 1988 and 1999, increased trade integration was associated with real wage gains of 12.0% for manufacturing workers in Ontario, but only 1.0% in Quebec, 0.8% in Western Canada, and 0.4% in Atlantic Canada.

Growth in manufacturing output for Ontario was strongly linked to increased trade integration in manufactures with the United States. Increased trade in manufactures with the United States was associated with annual gains in Ontario's real value added in manufacturing that totalled 11.1% from 1988 to 1999.

For other regions, the impact was considerably less. Increases measured 3.5% for Quebec, 2.9% for the Prairies, 2.8% for British Columbia, and only 1.8% for Atlantic Canada.

There has been a concern expressed that an increase in trade integration might lead to a decline in Canada's share of North American shipments as firms relocate to the larger US market and serve the small Canadian market through exports.

The study provides little support for this concern. In fact, Canada and each of its regions expanded their share of North American manufacturing during the 1980s and 1990s. Ontario's share increased most, followed by modest increases for the Prairies and Quebec, and smaller gains by British Columbia and Atlantic Canada.

The study shows that Canada and each of its regions are becoming more integrated in trade in manufactures with the United States, but Ontario is much more integrated than is the rest of Canada. Atlantic Canada is the least integrated, while Quebec and Western Canada are in-between.

For Canada and all of its regions, the pace towards deeper integration with US manufacturing was faster after the implementation of the FTA. Again, however, the pace has been much faster in Ontario.


Read Study

Canadian economic accounts for the First quarter 2006 and March 2006

Economic activity picked up in the first quarter as real gross domestic product (GDP) advanced 0.9% on the heels of continued strength in investment and personal expenditure. In March, monthly output edged up 0.1% from February.


Service-producing industries surged ahead as retail and wholesale trade, finance, insurance and real estate all advanced. Output of goods-producing industries inched ahead as manufacturers continued to battle the effects of the rapidly increasing Canadian dollar, and growing international competition. Exports declined slightly, mainly automotive, forestry and industrial goods.

Production declined in the mining, utilities and non-durable manufacturing sectors. In total, industrial production fell 0.3%. In the United States the index of industrial production rose 1.3%, bolstered by manufacturing and mining, while utilities receded.

A jump in household demand, particularly consumer spending on durables and housing, was behind most of the first quarter advance. Growth in final domestic demand matched the pace set in the fourth quarter and continued to outpace overall growth in GDP.

Real gross domestic product, chained (1997) dollars1
  Change Annualized change Year-over-year change
  %
First quarter 2005 0.6 2.2 3.2
Second quarter 2005 0.8 3.4 3.0
Third quarter 2005 0.8 3.2 2.7
Fourth quarter 2005 0.6 2.6 2.8
First quarter 2006 0.9 3.8 3.2
1.The change is the growth rate from one period to the next. The annualized change is the growth rate compounded annually. The year-over-year change is the growth rate of a given quarter compared with the same quarter in a previous year.

Economy-wide prices, as measured by the chain price index for GDP, fell 0.7% in the quarter. A large share of the decline was the result of falling energy prices. Economy-wide prices, excluding energy, increased 0.7%, a slight acceleration from the previous quarter.

The economy grew at an annualized rate of 3.8% in the first quarter, a sharp pickup from the 2.6% annualized pace set during the previous quarter. The US economy grew at an annualized rate of 5.3%.

Residential investment picked up following moderate growth in 2005
Investment in residential structures rebounded in the first quarter after stalling in the fourth quarter. The 3.4% first quarter increase was the strongest quarterly advance in more than two years. The value of new housing construction jumped, renovation activity remained strong and an active resale market all contributed to the strong growth.

Business investment in non-residential structures and machinery and equipment continued to climb in the first quarter, although at a slower pace than that of the last half of 2005.

Investment in non-residential structures grew by 1.8%. Investment in engineering projects slowed following two quarters of solid growth. Much of the growth over the last number of years has been in the red-hot oil and gas sector. Since 2002, engineering construction as a share of total investment in non-residential structures has risen from 67% to 71%.

Investment in machinery and equipment decelerated as expenditures in other transportation equipment slowed and telecommunications edged down following large increases in the last half of 2005.


Consumer spending accelerates
Consumers began 2006 much the same way they began 2005, by purchasing large amounts of durable and semi-durable goods. Expenditure on clothing and footwear, furniture and furnishings, household appliances and recreational, sporting and camping equipment all climbed well over 3%. All this activity pushed up output in the retail sector which advanced 2.0%. Personal expenditure by Canadians outside the country remained strong while spending by foreigners in Canada declined, driving up net expenditure abroad by 7%.

Spending on non-durable goods was essentially flat in the quarter as moderate growth in food, beverages and tobacco was more than offset by declines in purchases of energy related products such as motor fuels and lubricants. The warmer weather served to drive down consumption of natural gas and electricity, both of which fell for a second consecutive quarter.

Inventory buildup slows
A little more than $10 billion was added to inventories in the first quarter, down from the $15 billion buildup in the fourth. The bulk of this buildup was retail inventories which posted a second quarter of strong accumulation. This was offset by a large draw down in other non-farm inventories, specifically energy products. In the fourth quarter, imports of energy products jumped over 7%, oil and gas production climbed 3.5% while exports declined. The result was a large fourth quarter buildup in inventories. In the first quarter, the picture reversed as imports fell, production decelerated and exports rose, causing the large draw down.

Exports stall
Manufacturing output slowed to 0.1% in the first quarter, the result of declines in non-durable goods and transportation equipment manufacturing. Part of these declines has been attributable to weaker foreign demand, as exports stalled. Most commodity groups showed little growth or declined. Automotive exports, which increased over 15% in the last half of 2005, declined in the first quarter and exports of forestry products lost most of the gain they made in the fourth quarter.

Imports fell following two quarters of solid growth. Imports of energy products and machinery and equipment both declined. The quarterly decline in machinery and equipment imports is the first in three years. Imports of consumer goods advanced another 2.2%, on the heels of similar increases in the last two quarters of 2005.

Labour income pushes ahead, corporate profits falter on lower energy prices
Labour income advanced 1.2%, slightly off the 1.5% average quarterly increase registered in 2005. While service-producing industries were the source of strength for most of 2005, the goods-producing industries were behind most of the first quarter growth. Public administration wages and salaries stalled contributing to the weakness in service-producing industries, but educational services, health care and social assistance, posted first quarter increases. Growth in mining, construction and manufacturing helped boost growth in goods-producing industries.

Corporate profits fell 4.1%, the first significant quarterly decline since 2003, as lower export prices of energy goods put a lid on profits in the oil and gas sector. Excluding oil and gas extraction and refineries, profits posted a modest increase. Significant gains were registered in the real estate, rental and leasing, information and culture, and education and health industries.

GDP by industry: Highlights for March 2006
The Canadian economy edged up 0.1% in March, after increasing by 0.2% in January and by 0.3% in February. In March, growth in service-producing industries (+0.3%) more than offset a decline in the production of goods (-0.2%).

Monthly gross domestic product by industry at basic prices, chained 1997 dollars
  Oct. 2005r Nov. 2005r Dec. 2005r Jan. 2006r Feb. 2006r Mar. 2006p
  Seasonally adjusted
  Month-to-month % change
All industries 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.1
Goods-producing industries 0.4 -0.0 0.6 -0.5 0.5 -0.2
Service-producing industries 0.1 0.4 0.3 0.5 0.3 0.3
Industrial production 0.5 -0.1 0.7 -1.0 0.3 -0.1
Construction 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.1 -0.6
Retail trade 1.5 1.3 0.3 0.8 0.2 1.2
Energy sector 0.3 0.3 0.5 -3.0 2.0 1.1
rrevised
ppreliminary

Retail trade benefited from an upswing in activity among most retailers in March. New motor vehicle dealers were responsible for much of the 1.2% growth in this sector. Excluding new motor vehicle dealers, retail trade advanced 0.4%. Growth in wholesale trade was flat, held back by a reduction in motor vehicle exports.

Manufacturing output retreated 0.4% in March. Eleven of the 21 major groups, accounting for 54% of total manufacturing output, registered declines. A decrease in American demand for motor vehicles resulted in a sharp drop in motor vehicle manufacturing in Canada.

Construction declined 0.6% in March, taking a pause after growing steadily for 20 consecutive months. Residential construction declined 2.2%, wiping out the gain in February. Non-residential construction advanced 0.6%.


Buoyant stock markets continued to contribute to the growth of the financial sector (+0.3%). By contrast, real estate brokers registered a 1.6% decline, reflecting weakness in the home resale market.

Building on the previous month's strength, the energy sector advanced 1.1% in March. This gain has been largely attributable to a sharp increase in oil exploration (+13%) and to a rise in oil and gas extraction (+0.2%). Electricity generation and transmission declined 0.7%. Mining activity fell sharply (-4.6%), mostly due to a marked decline in potash production.

Note to readers
With the first quarter 2006 release of the Income and Expenditure Accounts, the data are revised back to the first quarter of 2002. For more information, consult The 2002 to 2005 revisions of the Income and Expenditure Accounts page on our website.

Canadians Willing to Pay Soaring Prices for Recreational Properties - Some Even More Than Their Homes

Royal Lepage Assesses Attitudes and Purchasing Actions of Canadians

TORONTO - Canadian recreational property prices continue to increase in most markets across the country, as demand remains strong and inventory remains scarce. Tight market conditions are expected as current cottage owners plan to stay put and young professionals enter the market in droves, according to the 2006 Royal LePage Recreational Property Report released May 30.

The report comprises a nationwide research poll of Canadian cottage owner and buyer attitudes and actions (conducted by Maritz Research) and a market analysis of recreational property prices, trends and activity in selected leisure markets across Canada.

According to the market analysis, significant price appreciation was recorded in most recreational markets and categories examined. While the average price of a standard waterfront, land access recreational property is $380,507, some of the more popular destinations - such as Grand Bend, Honey Harbour, Georgian Bay, Wasaga Beach, the Muskokas, West Kawarthas, Cranbrook, Kelowna, Vernon, Okanogan and Fernie - report sales in the range of $500,000 to over $1-million. The average price for a chalet is $413,694. Comparatively the national average price of a standard two-storey home is $340,956, according to the Q1 Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices.

While prices are high, almost one-quarter (24%) of those planning to purchase are willing to spend more on their recreational property than on their primary residence. Over half of this group (52%) would spend from $50,000 to $150,000 more on a recreational property and fourteen per cent (14%) would spend over $150,000 more on a recreational property.

"Escalating recreational property prices are evident in the majority of markets across the country, and do not show signs of decreasing in the near future," said Phil Soper, president and CEO, Royal LePage Real Estate Services. "The rising prices are not surprising given the fact that there is a convergence of buyers entering the market - with urban professionals, young families and baby boomers all vying for properties with similar features."

Soper added: "Despite recreational property prices rising well above the average price of a primary residence in some regions, Canadian sun and ski seekers remain committed to the dream of leisure living. Interestingly, the poll demonstrated that almost twenty per cent (19%) of people planning or considering buying a recreational property plan to pay in cash."

Surprisingly, while thirty-five per cent (35%) of people planning and those who would consider buying a cottage have budgeted approximately $100,000 to less than $300,000 for their recreational property, only five per cent (5%) of people planning to buy have budgeted within $300,000 to less than $500,000 - the range encompassing the average cottage.

Attracted by the peace and tranquility of cottage living and spending time with family, young to middle-aged adults comprise the bulk of prospective buyers. The study found that seventy-eight per cent (78%) of Canadians who are likely to or planning to purchase a recreational property in the next three years are under 49 years of age.

While the desire for a cottage is strong, the search for a recreational property may prove rather difficult this year as only fifteen per cent (15%) of cottage owners reported that they are likely to sell their property within the next three years - a slight decrease from 2005 - limiting the amount of resale recreational properties coming onto the market. Additionally, almost sixty per cent (60%) of cottage owners plan to will their cottages to family.

While there are an infinite number of elements that make a recreational property special, Canadians list the top three most important features to be a waterfront property, a lot with mature trees for privacy, and a large dock on the water. <<

------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rank Most Important Recreational Property Features
Reported by Canadians who currently own, are planning to purchase or would consider purchasing a recreational property

------------------------------------------------------------------------- No. 1 Waterfront Property
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
No. 2 Mature Trees Offering Privacy
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
No. 3 A Large Dock on the Water
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
No. 4 Full Bathrooms
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
No. 5 (Tie) Modern Amenities/Large Kitchen/A Large Deck Around the Property/Layout of the Property
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
No. 6 (Tie) Structure Newer Than 15 years/Open Concept
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
No. 7 Solar Power Capabilities
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
No. 8 (Tie) Having Internet Capabilities/Having a Guest House

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Other poll findings:

- Nine per cent (9%) of Canadians own a cottage/recreational property, while four per cent (4%) are planning to purchase and five per cent (5%) are considering purchasing within the next three years.

- When looking at alternative ways to finance the purchase of a recreational property, a surprising sixty-one per cent (61%) of those planning to or those who would consider purchasing said they would not consider buying a property with a sibling or family member. Similarly, sixty-four per cent (64%) of those planning to purchase said they would not consider renting it out during the year to make it more affordable.

- Of those polled, sixty-nine per cent (69%) of Canadians planning or considering to buy a cottage prefer a four-season capability recreational property to a one-season property.

- Sixty-one per cent (61%) preferred to be further removed from a town or small urban centre than in close proximity to urban services.

---------------------------------------------------
Recreational Property Price Summary
Average Price by Province

---------------------------------------------------
Standard Waterfront, Land Access Cottage
---------------------------------------------------
PROVINCE AVERAGE PRICE
---------------------------------------------------
Prince Edward Island $115,000
---------------------------------------------------
New Brunswick $91,875
---------------------------------------------------
Nova Scotia $162,167
---------------------------------------------------
Newfoundland $85,000
---------------------------------------------------
Quebec $483,333
---------------------------------------------------
Ontario $454,960
---------------------------------------------------
Manitoba $358,333
---------------------------------------------------
Saskatchewan $157,500
---------------------------------------------------
Alberta $900,000
---------------------------------------------------
British Columbia $996,900
---------------------------------------------------
National Average Cottage $380,507
---------------------------------------------------
Standard Chalet (Mountain base and within 30 mins.)
---------------------------------------------------
Quebec $250,714
---------------------------------------------------
Ontario $521,250
---------------------------------------------------
Alberta $512,500
---------------------------------------------------
British Columbia $370,313
---------------------------------------------------

National Average Chalet $413,694


---------------------------------------------------

Maritz Research conducted the poll portion of the Royal LePage Recreational Property Report between April 27 and May 8, 2006. The poll is based on a randomly selected sample of 3,005 adult Canadians with a total of 529 Canadian respondents who qualified for the study. With a sample of this size, the results are considered accurate to within +/-4.26%, 19 times out of 20, of what they would have been, had the entire adult Canadian population been polled. This data was statistically weighted to ensure the sample's regional and age/sex composition reflects that of the actual Canadian population according to the 2001 Census data.

TEC International: Canadian CEOs Confidence in the Nation's Economy Falls

CALGARY, ALBERTA- Canadians should expect to pay more for products and services over the next 12 months. After a surge in confidence over the last two quarters, Canadian chief executives' economic expectations for the next 12 months slipped by 4.8 percent, according to a survey released today by TEC Canada. Canadian bosses' confidence, which rebounded in Q4 2005 and Q1 2006 from a two-year low of 112.1, slipped from last quarter's 122.4 to 117.6.

More than half of Canada's SME leaders feel that the current economy has improved over last year's, however they are not as confident as they were last quarter that the economy will continue to surge ahead over the next 12 months. They anticipate lower returns in revenue and profit than originally expected at the start of the year and will therefore curb their fixed investment expenditures and new staff hiring plans as a result.

Of the 69 percent of respondents who anticipate hiring in the next 12 months, a 10 point drop over Q1, the bulk will increase their staff size by steadily hiring over the next four quarters. However, 17 percent will be topping up their staff numbers during Q2 of this year.

When asked to identify their most significant business issue, Canada's bosses once again said it was staffing. Additionally, 47 percent of those surveyed saw a lack of qualified candidates as having the most significant impact on hiring, while 53 percent listed factors such as oil/energy prices, the rise of the Canadian dollar and the like as the issue.

Fueled in large part by the rising cost of oil and gas, the Canadian dollar will continue its upward climb, according to this quarter's respondents. To offset the cost of energy, 36 percent of business leaders will be raising their prices while 30 percent opted to absorb it; 6 percent of those surveyed are decreasing their labour costs as a result.

The strong loonie has had a mildly negative or negative impact on the industries of 58 percent of Canada's SME bosses, according to this quarter's survey. As a result of the dollar's northward climb, 20 percent of chief executives have decelerated their company's expansion plans.

On a brighter note, the 2006 federal budget is receiving positive reviews. When asked what impact the new budget will have on their businesses over the next 12 months, 52 percent of respondents expect a mildly positive or positive impact. Additionally, 72 percent anticipate a positive or mildly positive tax effect as well.

This positive outlook, however, was not reflected in their responses when asked about a rate hike by the Bank of Canada. A whopping 71 percent of CEOs surveyed anticipate a negative impact on the Canadian economy stemming from a hike in the Bank of Canada rate.

For over two years, the TEC Confidence Index has forecasted annual changes in the economy, including job creation and price increases. The quarterly survey continues to serve as an accurate snapshot of Canada's economic landscape.

Over 100 CEOs of small to mid-size businesses took part in the survey and shared their views on current economic trends, issues affecting business and Canada as a whole.

Census 2004 family income

For the second year in a row, couple families in Oshawa had the highest median total family income among all census metropolitan areas. The median is the point where half of the families' incomes are higher and half are lower.

The median for couple families in Oshawa reached $83,100 in 2004, up 1.6% over 2003, after adjusting for inflation. Oshawa remained slightly ahead of Ottawa–Gatineau, where couple families had a median total income of $82,100, up 1.2% from the previous year.

Nationally, the median total income for couple families rose 1.6% to $64,800 in 2004. Among census metropolitan areas, the largest increases were observed in Greater Sudbury/Grand Sudbury (+3.7%) and Abbotsford (+2.9%), followed by Edmonton (+2.8%) and Calgary (+2.5%).

Among census agglomerations, the median total income for couple families in Wood Buffalo in northern Alberta remained the highest at $120,100 in 2004, up 2.6% from 2003. Dominated by the population living in Fort McMurray, this area is recognized for its involvement in oil sands development.

Couple families in the census agglomeration of Yellowknife ranked second with a median total income of $116,400 (+2.5%), followed by couple families in Thompson, Manitoba at $91,700 (+5.6%).

Among lone-parent families in census metropolitan areas, those in Ottawa–Gatineau again showed the highest median family total income in 2004, at $35,900. The median total income of lone-parent families in Calgary moved ahead of those in Oshawa in 2004, although both followed closely behind Ottawa–Gatineau, at $35,800 and $35,700 respectively. The national median total income for lone-parent families was $29,500, up 1.2% from 2003.

Employment income remained the main source of income for couple families in 2004, accounting for 79 cents of each dollar of total income, a contribution that has remained stable since 2000. Among census metropolitan areas, couple families in Calgary derived the highest proportion of their total income from employment, 84 cents of each dollar of total income. The lowest proportion was in Victoria, where 72 cents of each dollar of total income was derived from employment. The different nature of these two census metropolitan areas can further be illustrated by the contribution of private pensions to the total income of couple families. In Calgary, 3 cents of every dollar of total family income came from private pensions while the comparative figure was 10 cents in Victoria.

Quarterly financial statistics for enterprises First quarter 2006 Manufacturing shows some strength

Canadian corporate operating profits declined 2.6% to $56.1 billion in the first quarter of 2006, following five straight quarters of growth. Nevertheless, first quarter profits were the second strongest ever, surpassed only by the record high of $57.6 billion earned in the fourth quarter of 2005. Oil and natural gas export prices weakened in the first quarter, reducing profits in the oil and gas sector. A string of price increases had fueled a run-up in oil and gas profits over the past several quarters, a major factor in the recent overall profit growth.


Excluding the oil and gas extraction and refining industries, operating profits for the remaining industries increased 1.1% in the first quarter.

The non-financial industries' profits fell 2.8% to $41.3 billion in the first quarter, just the second decline in the past 11 quarters. Financial sector profits were also down, falling 2.1% to $14.8 billion. Overall, about half of the industries posted profit gains, while the remainder were down in the quarter.

Mining companies lose ground

Oil and gas extraction companies saw profits slide 9.1% to $8.0 billion in the first quarter. Profits had previously risen for five straight quarters from the $4.9 billion earned in the third quarter of 2004. Profits were pared by lower crude oil export prices, as exports generally account for about two-thirds of domestic crude oil production. Natural gas export prices were also down notably in the quarter. As reported in the March release of Canadian International Merchandise Trade, the export value of crude oil and natural gas declined in the quarter. Mild weather conditions cooled demand, keeping North American inventory levels high.

The metal mining industry also lost some ground in the first quarter, as profits fell to $0.8 billion from $1.2 billion in the previous quarter. Potash producers reported lower first quarter profits as export demand for potash wavered. In addition, while non-ferrous metal prices swelled in the quarter, growth in ferrous metal prices eased. The export value of primary iron and iron ore declined substantially in the first three months of 2006.

Manufacturing shows some strength

Operating profits improved in 9 of 13 manufacturing industries in the first quarter of 2006. However, lower profits by the petroleum and coal refineries pulled overall profits down 4.6% to $10.6 billion. Manufacturing profits peaked in the second quarter of 2004 at $12.5 billion, but have faltered over the past few years due to the stronger Canadian dollar, rising input costs and volatile demand for products. The Business Conditions Survey recently reported that manufacturers are expecting tougher times ahead, anticipating lower levels of production and employment in the second quarter.


Petroleum and coal manufacturers saw their first quarter operating profits drop to $2.5 billion from a record high of $3.7 billion in the fourth quarter of 2005. North America's warmer-than-normal weather in the first quarter moderated demand for petroleum products. Petroleum and coal exports were well down, a combination of the weaker demand and lower export prices. Domestic sales of refined petroleum also declined in the quarter.

Wood and paper producers churned out $1.0 billion in first quarter profits, up from $0.9 billion in the fourth quarter. However, profits remained just half of the $2.0 billion peak earnings of the second quarter of 2004. Shipments of wood products moved ahead for the three month period, but the gains were largely achieved early in the quarter.

Demand for lumber products was buoyed by robust construction activity both domestically and south of the border. However, lumber prices stalled in the quarter and remained much below year earlier levels. The strong Canadian dollar and high input costs continued to undermine profits in the wood and paper sector.

Motor vehicles and parts manufacturers' operating profits edged up to $0.4 billion in the first quarter from $0.3 billion in the previous quarter. Profits have been volatile over the past several years, but have trended downward since peaking at $2.5 billion in the second quarter of 2000. In the most recent quarter, exports of automotive products slowed, but domestic new motor vehicle sales accelerated.

Retail up but wholesale profits edge back

Retailers earned record high profits of $3.3 billion in the first quarter, up 5.4% from the previous high in the fourth quarter of 2005. Confident consumers continued to spend, boosting profits for retailers of furniture and electronics (+ 26.1%), food and beverages (+10.9%) and for clothing and department stores (+7.4%).

Wholesalers saw their profits slip to $3.9 billion from the record high $4.0 billion in the fourth quarter.

Financial sector profits weakened

Profits in the financial sector slipped 2.1% to $14.8 billion, following a 5.4% gain in the fourth quarter.

Companies dealing in securities, commodity contracts and other financial investment activities earned $3.5 billion, down 4.8% from the fourth quarter. The chartered banks earned $6.0 billion in first quarter profits, little changed from the previous quarter.

Profitability ratios

The operating profit margin weakened to 8.1% in the first quarter from 8.3% in the fourth quarter, halting consecutive increases dating back to the fourth quarter of 2004.

The return on shareholders' equity also deteriorated, falling to 10.9% from 12.0% in the previous quarter. After-tax profits, the numerator in this profit measure, fell 7.7% in the first quarter, reflecting lower operating profits and a decline in interest and dividend revenue.

Note to readers

These quarterly financial statistics cover the activities of all corporations in Canada, except those that are government controlled or not-for-profit.

Operating profits represent the pre-tax profits earned from normal business activities, excluding interest expense on borrowing and valuation adjustments. For non-financial industries, operating profits exclude interest and dividend revenue and capital gains/losses. For financial industries, interest and dividend revenue, capital gains/losses and interest paid on deposits are included in the calculation of operating profits.

The quarterly financial statistics for enterprises for the period covering 2003 to date have been revised following benchmarking to the 2003 and 2004 Annual series and seasonal adjustment revisions.

Leading indicators for Apr