Contact
Tel 519.886.2831
Advertising Inquires
Feedback
Subscribe to Exchange Magazine
Daily News
Visitor Events
Stock Reports
Weather
Department
Index

Agribiz
Associations
A/V Cast
Biotech
Book Reviews
Construction
Economy
Education
Energy
Entrepreneurship
Environment
Financial
Government
Health Care
Human Resources
Immigration
Legal
Lifestyles
Manufacturing
Marketing
Media
Philanthropy
Research Reports
Retail
Technology
Tourism
Transportation
World News
2006 Archive
Energy
Jan 1- March 27
ENERGY
Ontario Power Generation reports 2006 first quarter financial results

TORONTO - Ontario Power Generation Inc. reported May 11 its financial and operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2006. Net income for the first quarter of 2006 was $199 million compared with a net loss of $38 million for the same period in 2005.

"Our revenues and earnings during the quarter increased primarily as a result of our current regulatory structure. We continued to improve the reliability of our generating stations, which also favourably impacted earnings. Despite lower Ontario electricity demand caused by a warmer than normal winter, electricity production was only marginally lower than in the first quarter of 2005," said President and CEO Jim Hankinson.

Earnings for the three months ended March 31, 2006 were favourably impacted by an increase in gross margin from electricity sales because of an increase in OPG's average sales price compared to the same period in 2005. OPG's average sales price increased as a result of the introduction of regulated prices and other related regulatory changes effective April 1, 2005. However, OPG continued to be a moderating influence on Ontario electricity prices, receiving an average sales price for the three months ended March 31, 2006 of 4.7 cents/kWh, which was lower than the weighted average hourly Ontario spot electricity market price in the first quarter of 2006 of 5.2 cents/kWh. OPG's average sales price in the first quarter of 2005 was 4.3 cents/kWh. The impact of the improved gross margin on earnings was partly offset by an increase in pension and other post employment benefit costs primarily caused by changes in economic assumptions.

OPG's earnings during the three months ended March 31, 2005, were unfavourably impacted by an impairment charge of $202 million related to its Lennox generating station. At the time, it was determined that due to its relatively high variable costs, the Lennox station would not be able to recover its carrying value from the wholesale electricity market in the future.

Electricity generated in the first quarter 2006 of 28.4 terawatt hours

(TWh) was slightly lower than first quarter 2005 generation of 28.8 TWh. Electricity generated from OPG's nuclear generating assets increased primarily as a result of the return to service of Unit 1 at the Pickering A generating station. Hydroelectric generation increased slightly due to higher water levels at stations in northern and eastern Ontario. Fossil generation declined as a result of lower Ontario electricity demand caused by a warmer than normal winter.

Public Service Announcement
Cool your electricity demand on smog alert days

If you have a central air conditioner and live in the City of Toronto, you can help reduce the need for dirty coal-fired electricity imports this summer by enrolling in Toronto Hydro’s PeakSAVER program.

Here’s how it works: A peakSAVER switch will be installed on your central air conditioner. During peak electricity demand periods, like hot summer days, a signal will be sent to cycle your system off for a short period to reduce the amount of electricity needed by the province. You’re unlikely to notice any difference in home comfort as you do your part to reduce the need to import dirty coal power.

As an added bonus, Toronto Hydro will give you $25 for joining and will also pay for the installation costs. And if you join before July 8, 2006, you will automatically be entered into a draw for a $2,000 Future Shop gift certificate or a Nikon D50 digital camera.

http://www.torontohydro.com/electricsystem/powerwise/peaksaver/index.cfm

Toronto Hydro is Ontario’s most aggressive electricity conservation champion. Its goal is to reduce its customers’ peak day demands by 5% by 2007. If you do not live in the City of Toronto, please ask your local electric utility when it will have a peakSAVER program like Toronto Hydro’s.

Hydro One announces first quarter net income

TORONTO- Hydro One Inc. released its first quarter results on May 10 with net income of $152 million and revenues of $1,160 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006.

"Hydro One remains on track to achieve our 2006 financial targets. Strong and stable financial performance enables us to make the necessary investments to ensure the reliable supply of electricity to the people of Ontario," said Hydro One President and CEO Tom Parkinson. "Projects such as the $116 million investment we are making to reinforce the transmission system in the Niagara region are needed to provide access to new sources of generation in the public interest. The Niagara upgrades will increase our ability to import electricity by up to 800 megawatts and accommodate the expansion of the Sir Adam Beck facility in Niagara Falls."

During the quarter there were several industry developments and company initiatives, some of which are highlighted below:

- On February 21, 2006, the Ontario Energy Board (OEB) announced a decision to apply an earnings sharing mechanism to equally share, between Hydro One's shareholder and customers, any transmission earnings in excess of the approved return of 9.88%, for the period January 1, 2006 until new transmission rates are set. Our application for transmission rates will be based on a funding level sufficient to enable critical transmission expansion projects to proceed and to ensure the secure operation of the province-wide system.

- Relying on our comprehensive written and oral evidence, the OEB approved an increase of approximately $160 million in our distribution revenue requirement. This decision is expected to provide the foundation for maintaining and supporting the safe and reliable operation of the distribution system. The OEB's decision demonstrates their confidence that we will appropriately prioritize our work and spend our customers' money wisely.

- We continue to make investments in our distribution business in order to maintain and improve system reliability. Our program to install sectionalizers, which will help to reduce outage frequency and duration, is proceeding as planned and is expected to be completed in 2008. Increasing investment is also expected to be made in our wood pole replacement program.

- On March 3, 2006, we issued $300 million of 10-year notes at a coupon rate of 4.64% and with a maturity date of March 3, 2016. On April 24, 2006, we issued $250 million of 30-year notes at a coupon rate of 5.36%, a maturity date of May 20, 2036, and at a yield of 5.412%. This issue is a re-opening of the notes originally issued in May 2005. Both issues were under our Medium Term Note Program.

Net income of $152 million for the first quarter was $21 million, or 16% higher than last year. This increase reflects higher distribution tariff revenues and a reduction in our effective tax rate due to the recognition of a tax benefit in the quarter. Lower financing costs and depreciation expense also contributed to the higher level of net income. These impacts were partially offset by reduced transmission revenues resulting from the implementation of the OEB's transmission earnings sharing mechanism and mild weather.

Capital expenditures of $177 million for the first three months were higher than the comparative period by $21 million, or 13%. Expenditures made to expand the transmission system increased as a result of higher demand for customer connections and two critical investment programs: the Niagara Reinforcement Project and a project to construct an underground transmission line in downtown Toronto that will improve reliability. Asset replacement costs related to storm activity in north-central Ontario in early February 2006 also contributed to the increase.

Total revenues for the period were $34 million, or 3% lower than last year primarily due to the reduction in our transmission tariff revenues. Distribution revenues were marginally lower, reflecting lower purchased power costs, partially offset by improved tariff revenues attributable to a previously deferred rate increase effective April 1, 2005. Net cash from operations was $146 million for the first three months of 2006. During this period we paid $159 million in dividends to the Province of Ontario.

Ontarians Have Electricity Choice Demystifying Electricity Options

TORONTO - On May 1st, the electricity rate increases contained in Ontario Energy Board's new Regulated Price Plan (RPP) take effect. Direct Energy, North America's largest competitive energy solutions provider, is pleased to provide some contextual information to help Ontarians understand their various electricity options.

While Ontario's electricity structure can be complex, there are a number of key information points for homeowners to keep in mind when selecting their personal electricity solution.

- The Ontario Energy Board (OEB) is responsible for regulating natural gas and electricity utilities as well as setting just and reasonable energy rates.

- The RPP's electricity rates, which increase on Monday, May 1st, are based on the OEB's forecast of the cost to supply electricity to Ontarians over the next year and the recouping of any costs in excess of the forecast incurred for last year's supply.

- The RPP electricity rates will be reviewed every six months and adjusted if required.

- The RPP has two rate levels, a lower rate applies to consumption up to 600 per kilowatt-hour (kWh) per month during the summer season (May 1 to October 31) and 1,000 kWh per month during the winter season (November 1 to April 30). The RPP's higher rate applies to consumption above these threshold levels to reflect higher costs during high consumption periods, like hot summer evenings.

- The RPP rates also include two types of rebates, both related to the relatively low cost for generating power from the Ontario Power Generation's generation assets.

- Homeowners who choose to sign a long-term fixed price contract with a retail electricity provider, like Direct Energy, are also eligible for any and all rebates and will generally receive them on a separate line on their electricity bill.

- A kilowatt-hour is the basic measure of electric power consumption and standard through the world. For instance, a 100-watt light bulb burning for 10 hours uses one kilowatt-hour. The average home consumes 10,400 kWh of electricity per year.

- The cost of the electricity consumed is just one part of a homeowners' electricity bill. All bills also include charges to recover the cost to distribute the electricity, the cost to administer the wholesale electricity system and maintain the power grid and a debt retirement charge to pay down Ontario Hydro's remaining debt.

With Ontario's regulated rate having increased by 55% since the spring of 2004 and 16% since last year, a retail energy contract provides customers with long-term rate certainty and shelter from future price fluctuations. While these contracts offer customers control over their electricity costs and a stable, guaranteed electricity rate for the term of their contract, there is also the potential to accrue financial savings.

"When initially launched in 2005, the price of electricity under Direct Energy's electricity price protection plan was higher than the RPP. Following Monday's increase, some of our customers, who signed an Electricity Price Protection Plan less than a year ago, are already enjoying a net electricity rate that is lower than the new RPP," said Clinton Roeder, Senior Vice-President, Energy Services, Canada.

Direct Energy's current electricity offer is a Flat Price Protection Plan for 9.65 cents per kWh which is guaranteed not to increase for five years. "When the current forecasted rebates of 1.1 cents per kWh are taken into consideration, the net rate under Direct Energy's Flat Price Protection Plan is 8.5 cents per kWh," continued Mr. Roeder.

Ontario Government Opens New Hydro Electric Station

Glen Miller Hydro Facility Will Power 4,000 homes

TRENTON, ON - The Ontario government is delivering on its plan to ensure safe, clean, reliable, and affordable power for the future with the opening of the Glen Miller Hydro Electric Station near Trenton, Energy Minister Donna Cansfield announced April 26.

"This is another example of a clean power project that will help make renewable energy a key part of Ontario's future energy supply mix," Cansfield said. "All Ontarians will benefit as we increase our renewable generation supply."

The eight-megawatt, $21 million hydro project on the Trent River will generate enough electricity to power up to 4,000 homes. Glen Miller is the first new hydro power station and the fifth new renewable energy project to open in the last year as a result of the government's renewable energy RFP process.

"We're very pleased to be helping the province meet the energy needs of Ontarians," said project developer Michel Letellier, executive vice president, Innergex. "We support the Ontario Government's initiative to execute long-term contracts with independent power producers. It enables us to invest in sustainable development in the province."

"I want to congratulate the government for its continuing efforts to support the hydro power sector," said Paul Norris, President, Ontario Water Power Association. "Hydro power has been and continues to be a key component of Ontario's generation mix."

The Glen Miller Hydro Electric Station is one of the 19 new, renewable energy projects the province has contracted to date. Combined, these projects will help Ontario reach its goal of generating five per cent of its electricity capacity through renewable generation by 2007, and ten per cent by 2010.

"We are proud that since 2003 we have significantly increased the amount of renewable energy generation and brought an estimated $3 billion in new investment to Ontario," Cansfield said.
www.energy.gov.on.ca

Backgrounder

Glen Miller Hydro Electric Station

One of the oldest hydroelectric sites on the Trent-Severn waterway, Glen Miller Hydro Electric Station, has been revitalized. The 8-megawatt, $21 million project will generate enough electricity to power up to 4,000 homes.

Located in the community of Glen Miller on the Trent River north of Trenton, Glen Miller Hydro Electric Station was one of 10 winning proposals in the government's first renewable energy Request for Proposals (RFP) in 2004. The station developer, Innergex II Income Fund, is a private open-ended trust, that builds, own and operates hydroelectric power plants and wind farms in North America, especially in Canada. The Innergex Group contracted with Sonoco Canada, the owner of the site to revitalize the project.

Government of Ontario's Progress on Renewable Energy

The McGuinty government has set a target of generating five per cent of Ontario's total energy capacity from new renewable sources by 2007, and 10 per cent by 2010.

Through its renewable RFP process the government has contracted 19 projects for a total of 1,370 megawatts of clean renewable energy from wind, water, landfill gas and biogas projects.

Glen Miller Hydro Electric Station is the first new Ontario hydro station and the fifth renewable energy project to open as a result of the RFP process. Erie Shores Wind Project (99 megawatts) opened on April 13, 2006, Kingsbridge I Wind Project (40 megawatt) opened on April 6, 2006, Melancthon Grey Wind Project (67.5 megawatts) became commercially operational on March 4, 2006 and Eastview Land Fill Gas Project (2.5 megawatts) began operations on August 18, 2005.

Drain-water heat recovery to help homebuilders improve energy efficiency

"Technology can help Ontario reduce green house gas emissions"

Waterloo - Award winning scientist, author, environmentalist and broadcaster David Suzuki, with the Honourable Donna Cansfield, Ontario's Minister of Energy, John Milloy, MPP (Kitchener-Centre), Hans Schreff of London Hydro, and Corey McBurney, Managing Director for EnerQuality Corporation, the organization which oversees ENERGY STAR® for New Homes in Ontario, announced that EnerQuality's technical committee has recommended drain-water heat recovery for approval and inclusion in the ENERGY STAR for New Homes technical specifications.

The drain-water heat recovery system recycles waste heat from warm drain-water before it leaves the home. Approximately 90% of the energy used to heat water goes down the sewer. The Power-Pipe™, manufactured by RenewABILITY Inc., is a model which recycles enough heat to save up to 40% on hot water heating bills. "The Power-Pipe increases water capacity by up to 3 times, while allowing you to set the water heater temperature lower," said Gerald Van Decker, Founder and CEO of RenewABILITY Energy Inc.

"The Power-Pipe is made of specially designed copper coils that wrap around a separate copper pipe which channels warm waste water. This technology is very affordable and has a payback period of only 2-6 years. It is easy to install, requires no maintenance, and will last more than 50 years," he continued.

"This announcement highlights the advances that can be made when Canadians are focused on energy efficiency," said David Suzuki, who was in town to promote his new book, David Suzuki: The Autobiography (published by Greystone Books). "The Canadian drain-water heat recover technology is very simple, innovate and will contribute to reduced electricity and natural gas demand, which will help reduce associated greenhouse gas emissions and the need for producing more electricity."

Water heating is the second largest energy demand in the average house. In a 3-person Canadian home, electric heaters consume approximately 5,100 kilowatt hours per year (much of this is costly, peak electricity) and natural gas heaters consume 790 m3/year (which is 29.4 GJ/year).

Drain-water heat recovery systems, such as Power-Pipe, could potentially provide a big boost to the ENERGY STAR for New Homes initiative. "The technology could provide a less expensive way to meet the energy efficiency levels required for ENERGY STAR qualification," said McBurney.

Van Decker announced that, "Several homebuilders have already installed Power-Pipes into model and employee's homes and we have heard nothing but positive comments. Reid's Heritage Homes is expected to be the first ENERGY STAR builder to install the Power-Pipe, with many others to follow."

Ron Salisbury of Reid's Heritage Homes, who is building 70 condominium units in London, Ontario, commented, "Drain-water heat recovery systems will provide a less expensive way to achieve high energy-efficiency levels."

McBurney predicts many ENERGY STAR homebuilders will install drain-water heat recovery systems over the next year.

David Suzuki to participate in announcement of latest home energy-efficiency technology

The Power-PipeTM, an inexpensive technology which reduces water heating bills by up to 40%, will be made available to ENERGY STAR® homebuilders

The affordability and reliability of the technology is expected to make energy-efficient homes more widely available to homebuyers across Ontario

David Suzuki, Ontario Minister of Energy Donna Cansfield, John Milloy, MPP & Parliamentary Assistant to the Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs, Gerald Van Decker of Power-Pipe, Hans Schreff of London Hydro and Corey McBurney of EnerQuality Corporation, the organization which oversees the ENERGY STAR for New Homes program in Ontario, will announce the latest technology to transform the energy-efficient housing industry in Ontario. Remarks from David Suzuki and a ribbon cutting ceremony will mark occasion.

When:
April 25, 2006, 2:30 PM (Dr. Suzuki arriving and available at 2:00 PM)

Where:
RenewABILITY Energy Inc., 60 Baffin Place, Unit #2, Waterloo (see map below)

Directions:
RenewABILITY Energy Inc. is located 1 mile from the King Street Exit of the Conestoga Parkway/Provincial Route 85 North - Waterloo. Exit the Conestoga Parkway on King Street North (RR-15 North). After exiting Conestoga Parkway, proceed .4 miles on King Street making a right onto Northfield Drive East (RR-22). Travel .2 miles and turn left onto Davenport Road. Follow Davenport Road for .2 miles and turn left on to Baffin Place.

Who:
David Suzuki
Donna Cansfield, Ontario Minister of Energy
John Milloy, MPP (Kitchener Center)
Corey McBurney, Director of Operations, EnerQuality Corporation
Gerald Van Decker, RenewABILTY Energy Inc.
Hans Schreff of London Hydro

World Bank Urges New Breed Of Clean Energy Funding

Reuters reports “the World Bank is urging its steering committee to approve a new breed of loans and grants that would go to developing countries to help them make power generation cleaner and more efficient. A report drafted for this weekend's meeting of the International Monetary Fund and World Bank at the request of Group of Eight leading nations already seems to have gained traction among some emerging countries.”

“The World Bank said developing nations need to invest some $300 billion each year for the next 25 years to meet their energy needs -- largely in electricity -- so the report focused on ways to make projects less environmentally taxing. ‘It's quite clear we have a number of technologies but the private sector has walked away,’ World Bank chief scientist Robert Watson said. ‘The problem is to induce investment.’ … ”

“One idea floated by the World Bank is the creation of a grant to help developing countries cut the cost of buying new high-efficiency energy technology and infrastructure. Another would see existing power plants upgraded, with the gains from more efficient production going to repay the loans that funded the original overhaul. The Bank also suggested establishing a venture capital fund to finance the development of promising new clean energy technologies as well as bringing them to market.”

Agence France Presse further reports that “British Chancellor of the Exchequer Gordon Brown said in March that at the meeting in Washington Sunday he would propose a World Bank fund under which $20 billion would be invested to develop alternative energy sources in poor countries. But Steen Jorgensen, the Bank's acting vice president for sustainable development, said that while Brown's idea had been welcomed it was not debated by the Development Committee on Sunday. ‘We think the needs will be much larger,’ he said of the 20-billion-dollar price tag on Brown's idea.”

Dow Jones add the World Bank study noted that “‘large developing countries must improve their regulation of energy markets to remove the biggest obstacle to investment in clean energy … Rapid policy and regulatory reforms could increase private-sector investment in the electricity sector in developing countries, as would better risk management tools, like political risk insurance, the World Bank said. Removal of broad energy subsidies would promote conservation. Public funding could concentrate on clean energy technologies that are not quite economically viable but which have potential for wider use to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions, the World Bank said. ‘There is a wide range of technologies,’ Robert Watson, chief scientist at the World Bank, said at a press conference. ‘The problem seems to be the private sector has walked away.’”

Further covering the World Bank and IMF Spring Meetings, The New York Times writes that “rich nations and Russia are responsible for at least 70 percent of greenhouse gases, and developing countries that are expanding energy production to feed economic growth and reduce poverty say it is unfair to expect them to bear the financial burden of producing clean power, said Robert Watson. ‘The developing countries say if you want us to be climate friendly, we have to be compensated for the additional costs,’ he said. The Bank estimates it will cost $10 billion to $200 billion per year to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, depending on the rate of the reductions. To help meet those costs, Bank officials authorized a proposal for accelerating investments in clean energy, to be drafted in the next five months.”

Agence France Presse finally reports that “the Bank plan has provoked criticism in some quarters. Some "find the (project) to be biased toward the development of alternative, renewable sources of energy not yet commercially viable while neglecting the bigger picture of aiming for cleaner, more efficient traditional energy sources."

The news agency further notes that “Dutch Development Minister Agnes van Ardenne noted that the project principally targets middle-income countries where there is a potential market for the development of clean energy. She said she would have preferred an "energy for all" initiative that would embrace the millions of people -- 500 million living in sub-Saharan Africa alone -- who have no access whatsoever to electricity. Her German colleague, Heidemarie Wieczorek-Zeul, meanwhile called for the creation of a fund at the African Development Bank to which oil producers would contribute for the promotion of renewable power sources in African countries.”

IMF And World Bank Members Agree On Ways To Help Lessen Threats To Economic Expansion

The Los Angeles Times and The Associated Press report that “finance ministers endorsed proposals Sunday intended to make it easier for international lending institutions to deal with soaring oil prices, trade gaps and other problems that threaten to derail growth. The policy-setting committee for the 184-nation International Monetary Fund and the World Bank told the agencies to attack corruption and, in the IMF's case, give tougher advice to member countries. Oil prices, now at a record $75-plus per barrel, were among the developments causing officials from Europe, the US and other countries at the institutions' weekend meetings to worry about the prospects for long-term growth.”

Agence France Presse reports that “World Bank policymakers for their part launched a new anti-corruption drive and gave final approval to the cancellation of $37 billion in debt owed the Bank by 17 poor countries, most of them in Africa. The World Bank in addition unveiled a two-year project aimed at promoting the use of clean energy in developing countries.”

Reuters meanwhile notes US Treasury Secretary John Snow said on Sunday that “as wealthy nations offer debt relief to the poorest, they must be sure not to trigger a new lend-and-forgive cycle that becomes endless. The US Treasury chief said global lenders must find ways to ‘unleash the power of the private sector’ to help the poor while also fighting corruption in countries where they lend and increasing access to financial services for their citizens.”

Agence France Presse also reports that “energy needs were … very much on the minds of the Group of Seven industrial powers, who on Friday declared that it was ‘crucial’ for oil producing countries to boost infrastructure investment in the face of soaring crude oil prices. While G7 finance leaders agreed that the global economic outlook remained favorable, they warned that oil prices were a menacing cloud on prospects. Stepped-up pressure for increased oil production prompted a blunt reminder from the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries

(OPEC) that oil consuming nations bore a responsibility to build more refineries in order to ease supply constraints.”

The Wall Street Journal Europe meanwhile reports that finance ministers on the IMF's policy-steering committee Saturday endorsed Managing Director Rodrigo Rato's proposal for formal ‘multilateral surveillance’ for countries whose policies have important spillover effects on others. The change seeks to address limitations the IMF has encountered in dealing with issues such as the US trade deficit or China's exchange-rate policy. At the same time, the steering committee endorsed Rato's proposal to give more votes at the fund to countries whose economies have grown rapidly. Ministers said they expected to consider proposals to accomplish this at the IMF annual meeting in Singapore in September.

The Guardian (UK) suggests that the new role for the IMF heralds a drop in status for the G7. The emergence of China and India in recent years has made the G7 unrepresentative of the new global economy and unable to offer solutions to global imbalances.

The Financial Times suggests that “the weekend agreement to establish ‘multilateral surveillance’ and ‘multilateral consultations’ to address global trade imbalances may not sound like a breakthrough. But even the most skeptical finance ministers and central bank governors viewed the IMF meeting as a great success. There was finally a shared understanding that huge trade gaps represent the biggest threat to the world economy, they said and a willingness to do something about them.”

WILL IRAN TIGHTEN THE REINS ON THE GLOBAL PETRO SUPPLY?

Peter Tertzakian, author of A Thousand Barrels a Second Considers the outcomes of the UN’s deadline for Iran.

Whitby - The first Category 5 storm of the season is here – but it’s a different kind of storm. This is one politically motivated and with an outcome that is potentially more damaging than any hurricane. And the ‘eye wall’ of this geopolitical fury looks like it may be tracking a direct hit on the world’s already-vulnerable oil supplies. We can even predict the likely date: anytime after April 28th, 2006. That’s the deadline that the UN Security Council has given Iran to stop enriching uranium.

Though the issues surrounding Iran’s atomic program relate primarily to national security, the situation that is percolating can’t be separated from the oil markets. Iran has a couple of very big oil trump cards and it knows how to brazenly flash them around. For one thing Iran produces 4.0 million barrels per day, representing close to five percent of the world’s supply. It’s a significant contribution considering that the margin between global oil capacity and demand is a very thin three percent. In addition, Iran controls half of the Strait of Hormuz, the narrow 30-mile-wide waterway through which close to 17 million barrels of Middle Eastern oil passes every day; an artery that supplies almost 20 percent of the world’s 1,000-barrel-per-second oil addiction. Indeed, the Strait of Hormuz is recognized as the biggest ‘chokepoint’ of oil supply in the world. Any military action threatening Iran de facto threatens this Strait and all that passes through it. In addition, countries on the other side of the Persian Gulf from Iran – for example Qatar, the UAE and Kuwait – are generally considered by Iran to be complicit with the West, and whose oilfields are therefore potential targets for Iranian missiles should this geopolitical ‘storm’ really hit hard.

Here is a sample of potential outcomes, in order of severity, following the April 28, 2006, UN deadline.

1) Compliance by Iran – Diplomacy is successful; Iran complies with UN demands; all else being equal, oil prices are likely fall back to the $60.00 per barrel range; domestic gasoline retail prices potentially ease by 30 cents.

2) Stalling by Iran – Iran offers carrot of negotiation; diplomacy drags on with hopes of compromise; oil and gas prices may sag somewhat, but remain volatile.

3) Non-compliance by Iran #1 – Economic sanctions are imposed against Iran by the UN; diplomatic efforts on the nuclear issue drag on indefinitely; oil prices remain at current levels; no easing of gasoline prices anytime soon.

4) Non-compliance by Iran #2 – Iran stays indifferent to sanctions and proceeds with its atomic program; proceed to outcome (7)?

5) Non-compliance by Iran #3 – Sanctions imposed; Iran retaliates by restricting oil output; oil prices spike up; gasoline prices rise to mid-$3.00/gallon range or higher; proceed to outcome (7)?

6) Non-compliance by Iran #4 – Sanctions imposed; Iran retaliates militarily against other Gulf States; proceed to outcome (7).

7) The United States and/or Israel attack Iran’s nuclear facilities regardless of UN compliance or sanctions – Iran retaliates militarily; oil and gasoline prices spike up hard (how high depends on level of damage to oil supply lines); strategic petroleum reserves (SPR) are released similar to last year after the hurricane, but rebalancing the world’s normal supply and demand balance will remain challenging in the aftermath.

Of course, there are many variations on the themes above. In particular, it’s possible that any potential attack on Iran will elicit a minimal military response thus defusing the whole situation. After all, despite all of Saddam Hussein’s sabre rattling and bravado in the lead up to the March 2003 invasion, nothing happened. No oil fields were blown up and no missiles were fired at neighbouring oil producers in the region.

But Iran is not Iraq. Notably, Iran’s oil output is over twice that of Iraq, and as mentioned Iran is in a very strategic geographic location. As well, Iran’s bombastic leadership appears far more determined to pick a fight and play the trump cards it knows it has in its hand. Finally, Iran has a potentially oil-hungry friend in China; a relationship that makes Iran’s trump cards against the west stronger.

So, there is a major geopolitical storm brewing around oil. The winds are already up (as evidenced by rising prices) and addicted consumers of oil and petroleum products like gasoline are going to have to weather it. And if the Iranian situation isn’t threatening enough, there are storm clouds hanging over other major oil producers like Nigeria and Venezuela too. In an era where supply and demand for oil is tight, every oil producer feels it has trump cards.

From a consumer’s perspective filling up at the local gas station, it’s difficult to understand and relate to global politics in far-away lands. Distant hurricanes and typhoons often don’t get much domestic media. So, perhaps the storm metaphor is not personal enough. How about visualizing the world’s oil supply lines as arteries; a complex flow of pipelines and tankers pumping oil into the vital organs of our society, in particular our cars and trucks. Using this artery metaphor, the world’s oil supply lines are ripe for a heart attack.

WINDY FIELDS: Rural people living in the shadow of wind towers explore community-based solutions

While our urban neighbours celebrate the emergence of “green” wind energy in the province, they rarely live with the immediate impact of the wind turbines and the fallout from development. In Southgate – where farmers live in the long shadow of the Melancthon project – a new project is inviting citizens to take their wind future in their own hands.

Farmers gather this Friday for the first meeting of the WINDY FIELDS Green Energy Co-operative. GREY COUNTY - The arrival of the wind industry in the Township of Southgate has left its scars on this small rural community, according to Southgate Public Interest Research Group (SPIRG). Now, local landowners have begun to organize a community-based response to the wind opportunity: Southgate WINDY FIELDS Green Energy Co-operative, which will hold its first public, organizational meeting this Friday, April 21 in the hamlet of Swinton Park. Guest speaker will be Sally Miller of the Ontario Sustainable Energy Association: a leading expert on community wind in the province.

“This project is an outcome of an independent wind forum held in this community last December,” says Doyle Prier, President of Southgate Public Interest Research Group. “Wind energy is not inherently bad, but we have a community here who feel they may not be best served by the objectives and the tactics of large corporate wind projects. There is a place for a community response. We’re just trying to provide a forum for that response.” The WINDY FIELDS project has been sponsored, to-date, by the local PIRG group, but is expected to operate independently with its own Board and a specific mandate. The group has already secured the volunteer services of a lawyer and is seeking other Board members and advisors with specific skills. A small committee has been working on the formation of WINDY FIELDS since January.

The Township of Southgate is adjacent to the well-known Melancthon wind project in Dufferin County. Farmers of Southgate’s high-altitude, wind-swept fields have suffered from the general decline in agriculture, and have been especially hard-hit by the sharp drop in the beef industry and – more recently – challenges to their canola crops. “There are lingering concerns about whether there is a balance of control here between wind developers and the community,” says Prier. “The community needs to find its voice on this issue so we can build projects that work well for the people of Southgate. And yes, we’ll be speaking to the developers too.”

Event: WINDY FIELDS: Organizational meeting of the Southgate WINDY FIELDS Green Energy Co-operative – Friday, April 21, 7:30 pm, Swinton Park Community Hall, Township of Southgate
Costly oil sparks interest in alternatives
By Tom Cahill

PARIS - As energy prices soar, investors are taking a closer look at the makers of alternative power sources like ethanol and windmills.

The growing interest comes at a time when some of the biggest names in technology, including Bill Gates, chairman of Microsoft, are pouring money into companies that could help wean consumers from their dependence on oil.

"We're finally at a point where some of the alternate energy sources that are more environmentally friendly are worth taking a look at," said David Shaw, whose D.E. Shaw hedge fund manages about $20 billion and is planning to increase its stake in windmills. "We're interested in cleaning up the environment at the same time as we make money for investors."

Record oil prices are accelerating the push. Demand for fuels made from corn, sugar and soybeans will quadruple in the next three decades, a period when oil use will increase by less than 60 percent, the International Energy Agency estimated.

Diapason Commodities Management, a Swiss-based fund manager that oversees $4 billion, plans to raise $500 million for a biofuels fund that the company started this month.

Shares of Pacific Ethanol, in which Gates's Cascade Investments plans to buy a stake this month, have soared 20- fold in the past two years, valuing the seller of corn-based fuel additives at $894 million.

The Bloomberg World Energy-Alternative Sources index, which tracks Bonn-based SolarWorld and 14 other stocks, has jumped 33 percent in 2006 and reached a record earlier this month.

Stock in Archer Daniels Midland of Decatur, Illinois, the world's largest ethanol maker, is up 49 percent so far this year. Green Plains Renewable Energy, a Las Vegas-based company that is building an ethanol plant in Shenandoah, Iowa, that will handle 50 million gallons per year, is up 37 percent since it started trading last month. And Xethanol, a New York-based ethanol company, has risen 162 percent this year, valuing the company at $175 million.

New stock offerings are coming. VeraSun Energy, in Brookings, South Dakota, and Aventine Renewable Energy Holdings of Pekin, Illinois, both filed for initial offerings last month.

The average U.S. ethanol price has almost doubled to $2.44 a gallon in the past year. Wholesale gasoline prices have gained 39 percent.

"It's great when you can put that crop into your gas tank," Hugh Grant, chief executive of Monsanto, the world's largest developer of genetically modified seeds, said in a recent interview. "With $70 oil, bio-ethanol is here to stay."

Crude prices in New York this year have averaged about $64 a barrel, up 26 percent from last year. After reaching $69.60 a barrel on April 12, prices are just shy of last year's post- hurricane record - $70.85 set Aug. 30.

President George W. Bush in his State of the Union address on Jan. 31 said ethanol could become a practical alternative in six years.

"Ethanol is a huge market," said Vinod Khosla, founder of Sun Microsystems, who is privately financing ethanol fuel research. "I think it can replace all of our petroleum needs, or at least a majority. That creates a big opportunity that's very susceptible to technology."

Khosla Ventures plans to invest about 40 percent of its capital in alternative energy; Khosla declined to detail how much he is investing or the size of the fund. He also is co-chairman of a group that has proposed a ballot initiative in California that would tax oil extraction and use some of the proceeds for alternate energy.

"Energy has got to be one of the top five problems the world faces, and it's been frustrating to watch activists and politicians fail to solve the problem," said Robert Metcalfe, the co-founder of 3Com of Marlborough, Massachusetts. "Now it's time for the entrepreneurs and scientists to give it a try." He is testing a system to convert smokestack emissions into power-plant fuels in his current role as general partner of Polaris Venture Partners in Waltham, Massachusetts.

Polaris is dedicating part of its newest fund's $1 billion to clean-energy technology. The group, which has $3 billion under management, said April 11 that it made a $6.8 million investment in GreenFuel Technologies, which is developing ways to feed carbon dioxide emissions to algae that then can be converted into fuels. The investment is Polaris's first in clean fuels.

"The markets for the products are huge," said Metcalfe, who led the Xerox research team that invented Ethernet, a personal computer networking standard, in 1973. "If you can get it right, it's really a market that's infinite."


Copyright © 2006 the International Herald Tribune

Clean coal facts go up in smoke

Clean Air Alliance - Recently, there has been a flurry of calls from the Association of Major Power Consumers (AMPCO) and the editorial board of the Globe and Mail calling for Ontario to consider sticking with end-of-pipe pollution controls instead of phasing-out dirty coal. But while it might be in the short-term financial interest of AMPCO members for Ontario to spend hundreds of millions of dollars on pollution control half-measures, it makes no sense whatsoever for the province as a whole.

Here's a quick review of some of the key issues:

Replacement power.

The Globe says the coal phase-out will leave Ontario reliant on power imports. The fact is, however, that Premier McGuinty has repeatedly stated that Ontario will not phase-out its coal plants until we have the necessary clean replacement supplies to meet our electricity needs. Ontario is making good progress in securing Made-in-Ontario replacement power and the potential to produce more through increased efficiency, combined heat and power generation and new renewables is huge. These sorts of initiatives would put Ontario in a much better competitive position than wasting hundreds of millions of dollars on end-of-pipe half-measures.

Clean coal really just slightly less dirty coal

According to the Globe: "While true 'clean' coal does not exist yet, there is 'cleaner coal,' which has reduced levels of pollutants such as sulphur and mercury."

You don't have to look further than the Lambton Generating Station to see the gaping hole in this argument. Lambton's Unit 4 is the "cleanest" coal-fired boiler in Ontario, but it is far from clean. Its sulphur dioxide emissions rate, for example, is 49 times greater than that of a new natural gas-fired power plant. Sulphur dioxide causes smog, asthma attacks, heart disease, lung disease and death.

AMPCO, meanwhile, has asked Premier McGuinty to replace the province's existing coal plants with "new high-efficiency coal units with all possible, best available emissions control technologies installed by 2011." According to AMPCO, under this so-called "clean coal" option, Ontario's electricity-related, climate change causing greenhouse gas emissions would rise by 27% between 2006 and 2025. On the other hand, according to AMPCO's analysis, if Premier McGuinty keeps his coal phase-out promise, Ontario's electricity-related greenhouse gas emissions will fall by 77% by 2025 and by 90% by 2011. Which is the better solution?

Phasing-out coal is the lowest cost option for Ontario to achieve dramatic reductions in its smog-causing emissions and to achieve compliance with its Kyoto Protocol climate change target for 2010.

Stick with dirty power, say big polluters

On April 13 the Ontario Clean Air Alliance released the following statement: Some of Ontario’s biggest air polluters are calling on the provincial government to walk away from its promise to phase-out the province’s dirty coal-fired power plants. This week, the Association of Major Power Consumers in Ontario (AMPCO), called on the government to forget about the coal phase-out and adopt end-of-pipe pollution controls for coal plants instead -- while fully admitting that such controls will do nothing to curb the humungous greenhouse gas emissions from coal plants.

Phasing-out Ontario’s dirty coal plants will provide Ontario with 50 to 80% of the total greenhouse gas emission reductions the entire province needs to achieve compliance with its Kyoto Protocol climate change target for 2010.

You might think that a group of companies that includes many of the biggest air polluters in the province -- including Inco, Noranda/Falconbridge, Petro Canada, Shell, Imperial Oil and Dofasco -- might be more concerned about reducing emissions. AMPCO members took 14 of the top 20 spots for sulphur dioxide air emissions in Ontario and 10 of the top 20 spots for nitrogen oxide emissions in 2003, according to National Pollutant Release Inventory data. Many of the other top spots, of course, are held by Ontario’s coal plants.

Nitrogen oxide and sulphur dioxide emissions cause smog, asthma attacks, heat disease, lung disease, strokes and pre-mature deaths.

Ontario government can't distance itself from electricity price hikes

TORONTO - The April 12 announcement of a hike in electricity costs for consumers is just a taste of things to come, says the union representing workers in the electricity field. "The impact of Ontario Energy Board's announcement is that electricity prices are going up," comments Power Workers' Union President (PWU) Don MacKinnon. "It would appear that people using air-conditioning in the summer will be the first to feel the effects of the higher rates."

Ontario Premier Dalton McGuinty recently distanced himself from the anticipated rate hike saying that his government would not step in to soften the blow. This week the government made public an incentive plan for Ontarians to make their air-conditioning more energy efficient.

"Conservation is certainly important," continues Mr. MacKinnon. "But it will never be enough on its own to meet Ontario's future electricity needs." "Experts in the private and public sector have criticized Ontario's approach to the future demand for electricity," says Mr. MacKinnon. "The government's fixation on closing coal-fuelled plants and replacing them with natural gas ignores what countries like Denmark and Germany are achieving by installing clean-coal technologies at existing coal-fuelled plants. Without reliable back up generation in place, Ontario residents and businesses will be hit again and again with price hikes like those announced today."

Ontario could save $11 billion over the next 20 years if Ontario upgrades existing coal-fuelled plants with clean coal technology instead of replacing them with natural gas, says Mr. MacKinnon.

The government's own agencies - Ontario Power Authority (OPA) and Independent Electricity System Operator (IESO) - have in recent reports outlined the significant risks and challenges that will result from the government's decision to shut down existing coal facilities, observes Mr. MacKinnon. "Last week, the president of TransAlta said that Ontario's inability to meet future electricity demand was a key factor in deterring businesses from operating here."

The PWU is calling on the government to direct:

<< - OPA and the IESO to develop a workable contingency plan to ensure reliability and price protection for Ontario's citizens and businesses;
- Ontario Power Generation to start an Environmental Assessment process on new nuclear construction and clean-coal technology, and
- OPA to issue a Request for Proposal on clean-coal technology. >>

The Power Workers' Union believes that Ontarians require an energy supply that derives electricity from a number of sources, including clean coal, hydroelectric and nuclear, along with other economical renewable options. The PWU's better plan - (www.abetterplan.ca) - also includes a review of the province's natural gas strategy, investment in green power and the promotion of energy efficiency. This approach will guarantee the people of Ontario, and the businesses that operate here, an affordable, clean and secure supply of energy all year round.

The Power Workers' Union is the largest electricity union in Ontario, representing employees in electricity generation, transmission, distribution, regulations, and research and development.

2006 already a record year for Canada's wind energy industry - 260 MW of new installed capacity only the beginning

OTTAWA - Canada's wind energy industry has already broken its annual growth record in 2006 and is set to shatter it before the year is out. As of April 2006, Canada had installed 260 MW of new wind energy capacity, breaking the existing record of 239 MW established in 2005. An additional 250 MW of new wind energy capacity is expected to be installed in Canada before the end of 2006. Canada currently has 943 MW of installed wind energy capacity, enough to power more than 285,000 homes(1).

"With Canada's installed wind energy capacity expected to grow by more than 70% this year, it is clear that growth in Canada's wind energy production is rapid and accelerating", says Robert Hornung, President of the Canadian Wind Energy Association. "A solid foundation is being built in 2006 that puts Canada's wind energy industry on track to meeting and exceeding current provincial government objectives that seek a minimum of 8,500 MW of wind energy to be in place in Canada by 2015."

Projects already installed this year include the Kettles Hill Wind Farm in Alberta, the Centennial Wind Power Facility in Saskatchewan, the St. Leon Wind Farm in Manitoba, and the Kingsbridge and Melancthon Wind Power Projects in Ontario. These projects represent a total investment of $503 million and provide a number of local economic benefits in the form of lease income to landowners, tax revenues to municipal governments, and new investment and jobs in rural communities across Canada. There are also significant environmental benefits.

The Federal Government's Wind Power Production Incentive (WPPI), coupled with provincial government procurement processes for wind and renewable energy, has played a key role in facilitating wind energy development in Canada to this point. The 2005 Federal Budget commitment to expand the objective of the WPPI program to a level of 4,000 MW of wind energy development in Canada by 2010 will help ensure that Canada's wind energy industry will continue to grow rapidly for the remainder of 2006 and beyond.

"Even though the growth of Canada's wind energy industry is impressive, we must not lose sight of the fact that wind energy continues to develop more quickly in other countries", says Hornung. "With Canada's unparalleled wind resource, there are still opportunities to do more to maximize the economic, industrial development, and environmental benefits associated with wind energy for Canada."

World Energy Leaders Braced for Revolutionary Change Within The Industry

LONDON -- The utilities industry is facing its biggest challenge in modern times according to the eighth annual PricewaterhouseCoopers report 'The Big Leap: Utilities Global Survey 2006'. According to the report, two-thirds of the world's leading utility company leaders hold this view with the majority rating the changes that the industry will have to undergo as little short of revolutionary. This sentiment is felt most strongly in Europe (72%), which is grappling with conflicting challenges including supply and demand imbalances, infrastructure vulnerability and environmental concerns. The industry is ready to make a big leap forward with nearly two thirds believing the industry needs to adopt a 10 year focus on reducing environmental damage, developing new technologies, improving customer service relationships and finding new fuel sources. However, many feel that policy-makers also have to make a leap. 80% of respondents believe political and regulatory factors are inhibiting the ability of the sector to respond to these challenges, and shock factors such as supply or environmental crises may need to occur to force change.

The report which presents the views of 116 senior executives from leading utilities companies in 43 countries reveals security of supply remains their primary concern as it has over the last two years, particularly in Europe where twice as many utility leaders believe prospects for power cuts have increased rather than diminished compared to five years ago. Many within the industry believe the pace of change needs to be stepped up to face the challenges that lie ahead. 42%, for example, said the sector is lagging behind in the development of renewable energy sources. Regulatory uncertainty continues to affect investment in the sector and was cited as one of the top three concerns amongst the utilities companies polled. Meeting projected supply needs will require an investment of US$13 trillion by 2030(a) in power generation, transmission and distribution and gas-supply infrastructure yet 42% of respondents felt that government or regulatory policy restricted their ability to develop long-term plans. Manfred Wiegand, Global Utilities Leader, PricewaterhouseCoopers said:

"Our report highlights yet again the need for the industry to work with government and investors to make the infrastructure, technological, environmental and investment leaps that need to happen to arrive at a long term sustainable solution." Looking ahead Manfred Wiegand commented:

"We can expect to see a future power and gas utilities sector that is radically different from now. On the ownership and sector structure front, we will see many fewer and much larger super-regional generation and distribution companies, greater fusion of upstream and downstream energy and a continued move of infrastructure entities into private investment fund ownership. On the customer front, we will have the prospect of much greater end-user involvement in both industrial-scale power projects and smaller and more medium-sized distributed power." Across all of the industry, technology will be a key driver and investment in technology, particularly in clean coal generation, will be a key determinant in the extent to which greenhouse gas growth is mitigated. Coal and nuclear will play a larger part in the fuel mix. Finally, many in the industry feel there is the very real prospect of 'cap and trade' emission control schemes being extended around the world. The PricewaterhouseCoopers 'The Big Leap' report also highlights other key developments in the utilities sector:

-- M&A activity at record levels: Both the value of total deals and the size of deals are at record levels. Total deal value soared to US$196bn in 2005 from US$123bn in 2004.

-- Coal tops favoured fuel supplies: Coal ranks alongside gas as the fuel expected to make the biggest contribution to meeting demand growth in the next five years.

-- Nuclear ready to step up: Half of the respondents in the Americas and Europe and 44% of all respondents said they expect nuclear capacity to increase in their region as a result of concerns about climate change.

-- Technological advances: Companies are increasingly looking to technological innovation to deliver efficiencies and respond to the pincer of future demand challenges and environmental concerns.

Notes:

1. (a)According to the International Energy Agency/OECD World Energy Outlook 2005.

2. The Big Leap: Utilities Global Survey 2006 is a major survey of boardroom opinion inside utility companies conducted annually by PricewaterhouseCoopers.

3. This year, for the first time, the survey focuses on the sector's viewpoint about the changes needed to meet the challenges ahead. The report summarises the changes that are being made or need to be made in technology, investment, M&A, efficiency, cleaner fuels and customer relationships.

4. It includes data from 116 senior executives, from 98 utility and utility investor companies across 43 countries. Research covers Europe, the Americas, Asia-Pacific, Africa and the Middle East. The majority of utility participants were senior Vice Presidents and Presidents, CEOs and other senior managers.

5. The PricewaterhouseCoopers Global Energy, Utilities and Mining group (www.pwc.com/energy) is the professional services leader in the international energy, utilities and mining community, advising clients through a global network of fully dedicated industry specialists.

6. The member firms of the PricewaterhouseCoopers network (www.pwc.com) provide industry-focused assurance, tax and advisory services to build public trust and enhance value for its clients and their stakeholders. More than 130,000 people in 148 countries across our network work collaboratively using Connected Thinking to develop fresh perspectives and practical advice. "PricewaterhouseCoopers" refers to the network of member firms of PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited, each of which is a separate and independent legal entity.
Stopping coal-fired electricity imports on smog days

By paying electricity consumers in Ontario to reduce demand on smog-alert days, we can reduce air pollution, reduce the soaring cost of electricity on high-demand days and keep electricity dollars in Ontario instead of paying for high-cost imports of dirty coal-fired power from the Ohio Valley.

The Ontario Power Authority (OPA) is planning to introduce a new demand-response program in the summer of 2006 that will help the province tap into these and other benefits by paying major power consumers to reduce demand on smog-alert days. This is an important step in the right direction, but there are some serious limitations to the OPA’s proposed program:

1. The OPA is proposing that those industries or institutions willing to reduce demand on smog-alert or high-demand days be paid less than the rate for U.S. imports (potentially as much as 80% less). This makes little sense. By paying demand-response participants the same rate we would pay for imports, we will maximize demand reductions and eliminate the need for dirty power imports that generate smog that drifts into our airshed.

2. The OPA is also proposing to cap the amount of demand-response measures it will purchase at 250 megawatts (MW), despite the fact that Ontario imported more than 3,000 MW of coal-fired electricity imports on some smog-alert days last summer. Why put an artificial cap on the cleaner alternative? It would make far more sense for the OPA to purchase all available cost-effective demand reductions on smog-alert days.

Those hazy and all-too-smoggy days of summer are coming soon, so the sooner we get an effective and wide-reaching demand-response program in place, the better.

For more information about this issue, please see our new report: Stopping Coal-Fired Electricity Imports on Smog Days: A Review of the OPA’s Proposed 250 MW Demand Response Program, available on our website at
www.cleanairalliance.org.

LATIN AMERICA POISED TO LEAD GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT OF BIOFUELS

São Paulo, Brazil – Latin America is well positioned to become a global leader in biofuels and renewable energy, and the United States and other countries are keen to explore partnerships in the region to develop them.

These ideas emerged from a plenary session on Competing in the Global Economy at the World Economic Forum on Latin America, a two-day gathering of leading figures in government, business, academia and civil society being held in São Paulo, Brazil.

Luiz Fernando Furlan, Minister of Development, Industry and Trade of Brazil, told the gathering that he recently received a delegation from California and is now heading to Japan to discuss initiatives in the biofuel realm. He has also held talks with South African officials to explore the possibility of working with that country to offer biofuel to the rest of Africa. There are at least 50 examples of new investments in sugarcane for biofuel currently being implemented in Brazil, said Furlan. "There may also be possibilities for joint ventures," he said.

"There is a very serious energy agenda that we can work on together," agreed E. Anthony Wayne, US Assistant Secretary of State for Economic and Business Affairs. "We are embarking on a programme to diversify our energy sources and change the mix," he said. "And Brazil is a leader in ethanol production and deep sea drilling for petroleum." Argentinean natural gas is also on the US radar screen, he said.

Argentina is working on ways to develop compressed natural gas as an automobile fuel export, said Martín P. Redrado, President of the Central Bank of Argentina. "We have had discussions in Northern Africa, India and other places," he reported. His country is also offering incentives for biofuel development from soybeans, he added.

A potential outgrowth of efforts in biofuel could be a broader expansion in biotechnology. "There are only three countries in the world that have decoded the genome of a living organism, and Brazil is one of them," said Furlan. "And we are rich in biodiversity."

Ontario Government Increasing Electricity Supply For Western GTA

Natural Gas Plant Will Provide 500 Megawatts Of Clean Electricity By Summer Of 2007

BRAMPTON - The Government of Ontario took another step in its plan to provide more reliable energy for Ontario today when Energy Minister Donna Cansfield helped launch the construction of Sithe Global Power's Goreway Drive Generating Station.

"We're building a new energy future that will keep the lights on and ensure our children have cleaner air," Cansfield said. "This facility, and others being built across Ontario, will allow us to maintain a stable supply of power while closing down our dirty, coal fired generating stations."

When it is completed, the facility will be capable of producing 875 megawatts of electricity, enough to power about 330,000 homes. The project will provide 500 megawatts of electricity by the summer of 2007 and the remaining 375 megawatts will be ready by the summer of 2008. It will be one of the largest combined cycle natural gas generating stations in Canada. The project will create about 900 construction jobs and about 30 full time positions.

"We are honoured and pleased that the Government of Ontario and the Ontario Power Authority have placed their confidence in Sithe Global Power to help meet the electricity supply needs of this fast-growing region of the province," said Bruce Wrobel, Sithe Global Power's CEO.

The Sithe plant is being built to meet a directive issued by the government to the Ontario Power Authority to address a vital need for electricity in the western part of Greater Toronto Area. This directive is part of the McGuinty government's plan to close all the coal fired generating stations in Ontario by the end of 2009 and replace them with cleaner sources of electricity. The Lakeview coal fired plant in south Mississauga closed in April 2005. It was among the largest polluters in the GTA.

"The Goreway natural gas fired power plant will help Ontario to phase out it's dirty coal fire power plants, reduce air pollution and protect public health," said Jack Gibbons, Chair of the Ontario Clean Air Alliance. The McGuinty government has signed contracts for 18 renewable energy projects that will add about 1,300 megawatts of clean energy to the system by 2008. These projects were the result of two successful Requests for Proposals operated by the government.

Since taking office, the government has set the wheels in motion to bring online over 11,000 megawatts of new, cleaner electricity generation - more than any other jurisdiction in North America. The government also recently introduced a Standard Offer Contract program, which is expected to add another 1,000 megawatts of renewable energy sources over the next ten years.

Top Global Companies Join With WBCSD to Make Energy Self-Sufficient Buildings a Reality

GENEVA -- The World Business Council for Sustainable Development announced March 29 that it is forming an alliance of leading global companies to determine how buildings can be designed and constructed so that they use no energy from external power grids, are carbon neutral, and can be built and operated at fair market values.

The industry effort is led by United Technologies Corp. (NYSE: UTX), the world's largest supplier of capital goods including elevators, cooling/heating and on-site power systems to the commercial building industry, and Lafarge Group (NYSE: LR, Euronext: LG), the world leader in building materials including cement, concrete, aggregates, gypsum and roofing. The WBCSD and the two lead companies are in discussions with many other leading global companies that are expected to join the project and will be announced shortly.

Buildings today account for 40 percent of energy consumption in developed countries according to the OECD. The effort announced today for transforming the way buildings are conceived, constructed, operated and dismantled has ambitious targets: By 2050 new buildings will consume zero net energy from external power supplies and produce zero net carbon dioxide emissions while being economically viable to construct and operate.

Constructing buildings that use no net energy from power grids will require a combination of onsite power generation and ultra-efficient building materials and equipment.

The project will comprise three phases, each producing reports that together will form a roadmap to transform the building industry. The first report will document existing green building successes and setbacks, the second will identify the full range of present and future opportunities, and the third will present a unified industry strategy for realizing those opportunities by 2050, specifically in China, India, Brazil, the U.S. and the E.U.

Each report will take one year to complete and involve hearings and conferences with building contractors and suppliers, sustainability experts, government representatives, regulators, utility officials and others.

"Green" buildings already are erected in various parts of the world but current cost structure prevents widespread adoption by general contractors. The project will build on these examples, aligning costs and benefits in the building equation and by working in close collaboration with architects, builders, suppliers and building owners to promote a more sustainable approach to construction. Existing standards for energy efficiency in buildings will be the starting point for the industry-led alliance.

"Lafarge has been leading efforts in energy efficiency and sustainable construction in the building materials sector for a number of years, not only by reducing greenhouse gas emissions during the production process but also by developing materials that contribute to making buildings more energy efficient," said Bertrand Collomb, Chairman of Lafarge.

"In this context, Lafarge has been collaborating with leading architects to promote sustainable construction as illustrated by our partnership with French Architect Jacques Ferrier, which led to the development of the 'Hypergreen' concept: This multi-use tower building, designed for the world's mega-cities, is highly energy self-sufficient thanks to the use of the latest construction methods and technologies."

"Buildings of tomorrow should be self-sufficient in energy and have carbon neutral emissions," said Jan van Dokkum, president of UTC Power, a United Technologies company.

"This can be done by incorporating renewable energy sources into a building's design, optimizing energy efficiency of support systems, and taking advantage of geographic and culturally acceptable building practices. Additionally, this aim is enhanced by using the 'cradle to cradle' concept of producing, using and later re-using building materials. This vision of energy and carbon neutral designs is a necessary evolution we need to embrace to achieve sustainability for buildings."

Bjorn Stigson, President of the WBCSD noted that "being smarter and more efficient about how we use energy in buildings will help us conserve energy, reduce greenhouse gas emissions and address climate change. We believe this initiative can provide extremely cost-effective solutions. It will also set the course for self-sufficient and environmentally sound buildings in which future generations will live, work and be entertained. Our partners are industry leaders with technological expertise and presence that no single existing organization or government could provide on its own."

The World Business Council for Sustainable Development, based in Geneva, is a coalition of some 190 international companies united by a shared commitment to sustainable development via the three pillars of economic growth, ecological balance and social progress. Its members are drawn from more than 35 countries and 20 major industrial sectors.

United Technologies Corp., based in Hartford, Conn., USA, is a Dow Jones Industrial company that reported $43 billion in 2005 revenues. UTC employs approximately 220,000 people worldwide and provides high technology products and services to the building and aerospace industries. It has been recognized as Fortune magazine's "Most Admired" aerospace company for six consecutive years based on criteria including social responsibility and innovation. The company is listed on the Dow Jones Sustainability Indexes and was one of 20 U.S.-based companies to be listed on the 2006 "100 Global Most Sustainable Corporations in the World."

Lafarge, headquartered in Paris, is the world leader in building materials and holds top-ranking positions in all four of its businesses: Cement, Aggregates & Concrete, Roofing and Gypsum. The company employs 80,000 people in 75 countries and posted sales of euro 16 billion in 2005. Lafarge has been committed to sustainable development for many years believing that long-term value is best created when considering the interests of the community and environment in which it operates. This strategy reflects the Group's core values and combines industrial know-how, performance, value creation, respect for employees and local cultures, environmental protection and the conservation of natural resources and energy. It is the only construction materials company to be listed on the 2006 "100 Global Most Sustainable Corporations in the World."
Building a Culture of Energy Conservation in Ontario

New Act Sets Stage For Smart Meter Installation, Helps Ontario Households Conserve

QUEEN'S PARK - Legislation giving Ontarians important tools to manage electricity use and save money on their energy costs has received Royal Assent, Energy Minister Donna Cansfield announced.

"This legislation is an important step in creating a conservation culture in Ontario," said Cansfield. "Through tools like smart metering, consumers will have better information and more control over the cost of the electricity they consume. Taxpayers will save too, as institutions like schools and hospitals become more energy efficient thanks to the Energy Conservation Responsibility Act, passing the savings on to all Ontarians."

The Energy Conservation Responsibility Act establishes the legislative framework for the installation of smart metering in Ontario homes and small businesses. The government has committed to installing 800,000 smart meters by 2007, and ensuring that smart meters are installed in all homes and small businesses by 2010.

"During our recent public consultations on Ontario's energy future, citizens said time and time again that conservation was an effective way to ensure a safe, clean, secure and reliable supply of electricity," said Cansfield. "This legislation will help make increased conservation a reality." As a result of this legislation, ministries, agencies and broader public sector organizations can be required to prepare and publish energy conservation strategies on a regular basis, reporting on energy consumption, proposed conservation measures, and progress on achieving results.

"This legislation represents important progress on conservation matters," says Peter Love, Ontario's Chief Energy Conservation Officer. "This is an important step in the right direction and we look forward to working with all Ontarians as we continue to build a culture of conservation."

The legislation also contains an amendment, introduced as a result of legislative hearings, that will enable individual metering of condominium units, through local distribution companies or third party companies, all of whom would be licensed by the Ontario Energy Board. Individual meters would allow condominium owners to control their own energy costs.

"Rather than continuing to bury rising energy costs in ever escalating condo fees, this legislation allows an important segment of our province's home owners a real say in energy conservation, and their own energy costs," Cansfield said.

The legislation builds on other government initiatives intended to increase conservation in the province. These include:

- Directing the Ontario Power Authority (OPA) to undertake programs that will further boost energy conservation in Ontario including developing an appliance exchange program, conservation outreach and education and a low-income and social housing program. These measures could reduce overall electricity consumption by as much as 200 megawatts - enough power for 125,000 homes

- Directing the OPA to obtain 300 megawatts of conservation in Toronto. Combined with the 250 megawatts of conservation programs by Toronto Hydro, this more than doubles the conservation programs for the city

- Directing the OPA to obtain up to 500 MW of demand response and demand side management projects across the province, in addition to 300 MW of conservation and demand management projects targeting the residential, commercial and public (municipalities, universities, schools and hospitals) sectors

- Directing the OPA to obtain up to 1000 MW of combined heat and power projects

- Partnering with Ontario's utilities to launch powerWISE, an initiative to help consumers achieve energy conservation and savings

- Enabling Ontario's local distribution companies to invest more than $160 million for energy conservation measures across Ontario

- Being well on the way to reaching the government's target of achieving a 10 per cent reduction, by 2007, in its own electricity use

- Creating a net metering program that allows farmers, small businesses, and consumers that generate renewable electricity to receive credit for the excess power they produce

Undertaking a public consultation on proposed changes to Ontario's Building Code to increase the energy efficiency of buildings. The consultation is led by the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing.

"A conservation culture is vital to Ontario's future," Cansfield said. "We see conservation as a real opportunity to help Ontarians prosper, by reducing costs to individuals and to business, by creating new jobs and new industries, and by reducing our use of a precious resource."

Backgrounder

SMART METERING AND ELECTRICITY CONSERVATION IN ONTARIO

The Energy Conservation Responsibility Act implements two major conservation initiatives: the introduction of smart metering technology in Ontario and conservation leadership.

SMART METERING

The Energy Conservation Responsibility Act enables the McGuinty government to install 800,000 smart meters in Ontario homes and businesses by 2007 with installation in all homes and businesses by 2010. These meters will revolutionize the way Ontario consumers track and manage their energy use. Smart metering provides consumers with greater control over their energy costs that can lead to system-wide savings through reduced demand.

With smart metering, customers can choose to control their energy costs through moving usage to off-peak periods (running the dishwasher at night) or lowering energy use during all periods (setting the air conditioning a few degrees higher). Customers may be able do this manually by adding control devices themselves (i.e. programmable thermostats) or by contracting others who may control load remotely.

The legislation also sets the framework for an entity that will oversee Ontario's smart metering communications systems and technologies. The responsibilities of this organization could include facilitating the procurement of smart meter systems and the collection and management of data. Local distribution companies will own, install, operate and maintain the new meters, and they will retain their important role in working for their customers.

The legislation gives the government flexibility to determine the best options for the governance, ownership and regulatory structures of the smart metering initiative as it goes forward. These options will be the subject of consultations over the next two months.

CONSERVATION LEADERSHIP

The second component of The Energy Conservation Responsibility Act is conservation leadership. This legislation will help Ontario's public sector lead the way in energy conservation and help it manage energy costs.

The legislation promotes public sector leadership in conservation, helps remove barriers to conservation and strengthens the conservation culture in Ontario. Some of the highlights of the bill include:

- Promoting Conservation Planning Ministries, agencies and broader public sector organizations can be required to prepare and publish conservation plans on a regular basis. The plans may include reports on energy consumption, proposed conservation measures, and progress on energy conservation.

- Demonstrating Conservation Leadership The government is committed to removing barriers and promoting opportunities for energy conservation and energy efficiency in its operations. For example, the bill would require government ministries and agencies to factor in conservation and energy efficiency in their procurement and capital investment decisions.

- Encouraging Conservation Actions The legislation will help remove barriers to energy conservation that may exist in current codes or by-laws. It could also require energy efficiency and usage information to be made available when homes are being sold.

- Facilitating Conservation Co-operation The legislation will facilitate agreements between the government and other sectors to collaborate on conservation programs. Agreements could involve co-operation on research, conservation benchmarking and improvements to facilities.

Ontario Power Generation's Darlington Unit 3 enters maintenance outage after 492 days of operation

CLARINGTON - Ontario Power Generation's Darlington Unit 3 was safely shut down today, beginning an outage that will include inspections and maintenance on a variety of nuclear and non-nuclear systems as part of the station's maintenance cycle.

"Darlington Unit 3 enters this maintenance period after operating for 492 consecutive days," said Gregory Smith, Senior Vice President of the station. "During that time the Unit produced over 10 TWh of electricity; more than enough to have supplied a city about the size of Oshawa for eight years."

Maintenance scheduled during this seven week outage will focus on the continuous improvement of the station's reliability; inspection and maintenance of feeder piping that is part of the Unit's nuclear heat transport system; and inspection and maintenance of the turbine generator.

"Safety, reliability and performance are the focus of our nuclear program and last year's results at Darlington - the best performing multi-unit Candu station in Canada - complemented the solid performance of Unit 3," said Gregory. "As a station, Darlington produced over 17 per cent of all the electricity consumed in Ontario last year."

Darlington units 1, 2, and 4 are all operating at 100 per cent delivering nearly 2,600 MW of electricity to the Ontario electricity grid.

Ontario Power Generation Inc. is an Ontario-based electricity generation company whose principal business is the generation and sale of electricity in Ontario. Our focus is on the efficient production and sale of electricity from our generation assets, while operating in a safe, open and environmentally responsible manner.

Electric power generation, transmission and distribution 2004

Electric power producers earned operating revenues of $49.9 billion in 2004, up 1.6% from 2003. The industry registered a net income of $5.2 billion in 2004, up 59.4% from 2003, as operating expenses edged up 0.1% to $39.7 billion, reflecting the lower cost of purchased electricity. Net electricity generation in Canada increased 1.4% to 577 terawatt hours.

DSEA fosters renewable energy investment in Durham Region - Durham's historical strengths provide ideal business incubator

DURHAM - The Durham Strategic Energy Alliance (DSEA) is encouraging its energy-industry partners to take up the challenge of filling Ontario's order for up to 1,000 MW of energy from renewable sources like solar, wind, biomass and small hydro-electric over the next 10 years.

On March 21, the Ontario government announced it will "lead the way in using clean, renewable electricity by setting a standard price" for small projects feeding into the provincial grid.

The Standard Offer Program will set a fixed price of 11 cents per kilowatt-hour for wind, biomass or small hydroelectric and 42 cents per kilowatt-hour for solar power.

DSEA chairman Michael Angemeer says the Government's announcement provides small businesses a unique opportunity. Durham Region, he adds, can provide the conditions for those businesses to thrive.

"Durham provides an ideal home base for small manufacturers and generators through the synergies created within the current energy cluster," Mr. Angemeer says. "In Durham Region, there is a symbiotic relationship built on a thriving energy industry, progressive local government and energy-focused research and training at the University of Ontario Institute of Technology. UOIT is the first Canadian university with a school dedicated to energy systems and nuclear engineering."

With its historic links to Ontario's electricity production, Durham offers the physical infrastructure and the human resources to support fledgling projects.

"The energy industry is at home in Durham Region," says Mr. Angemeer. "We have supportive local government and a supportive community. Through DSEA we have pooled the strengths of the private, public and education sectors to create a support network for businesses looking to create innovative solutions to the province's energy challenges."

ENERGY PRODUCERS IN WATERLOO REGION TO BENEFIT FROM EXPANDED OPPORTUNTIES FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY IN ONTARIO

WATERLOO REGION — John Milloy, MPP for Kitchener Centre welcomed Premier Dalton McGuinty, Energy Minister Donna Cansfield and renowned environmentalist David Suzuki to Waterloo Region yesterday.

Milloy joined the Premier and the Energy Minister at Photowatt Technologies in Cambridge to announce that Ontario will be setting a standard price that will make it easier for entrepreneurs and businesses to sell clean power from small projects to the grid.

Until now, it was too costly and complex for small, renewable power producers — such as farmers, rural landowners, community groups, First Nations, business owners or municipalities — to sell their energy to the grid.

“Waterloo Region has proven itself to be a hub when it comes to developing renewable energy, particularly solar energy. This announcement will help stimulate renewable energy projects, create new, high-skill jobs and reduce air pollution,” said Milloy. “Waterloo Region can play an integral role in helping to fulfill Ontario’s energy needs.”

“We’re taking a bold new step that will allow hundreds of small, local, renewable energy producers to get into the energy market — providing cleaner energy that will help meet Ontario’s needs today — and in the future,” said Premier McGuinty.

Through Ontario’s Standard Offer Program, the government will set a fixed price for small renewable energy projects. Under the plan, the Ontario Power Authority will purchase electricity produced by wind, biomass or small hydroelectric at a base price of 11 cents per kilowatt-hour. The fixed price for solar will be 42 cents per kilowatt-hour.

Over the next ten years, this will help add up to 1,000 megawatts of renewable energy to Ontario’s electricity supply — enough to power 250,000 homes. It will help ease the strain on Ontario’s electricity system, reduce air pollution, promote reliability, protect the environment and create new, high-skill jobs.

“The McGuinty government is committed to expanding the opportunities for clean and renewable generation in Ontario,” Cansfield said. “Through the program, Ontarians will have an opportunity to improve our air quality and take advantage of a whole new revenue stream.”

House Should Act Quickly on Affordable Energy

Statement by Myron Ebell, Director of Energy Policy, Competitive Enterprise Institute on opening the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to Energy Exploration

CEI congratulates the Senate on its passage of yesterday’s budget resolution containing provisions to open limited areas of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to oil and gas exploration. In order to realize the benefits of the Senate’s move, however, the House of Representatives must act quickly to adopt the same provisions.

The ANWR authorization in the current budget resolution is one of the key policies to address responsibly the nation’s long term energy needs. The American people are looking to Congress for leadership in adopting affordable energy policies. Now is the time to act.

The ANWR provisions were passed in both the House and Senate last year, but were derailed from final approval by an obstructionist minority unable to offer any viable alternatives. We hope that the House leadership will now be determined to overcome that obstructionist minority and pass legislation to open ANWR.

CEI is a non-profit, non-partisan public policy group dedicated to the principles of free enterprise and limited government. For more information about CEI, please visit our website at
www.cei.org.

Province's Chief Energy Conservation Officer recognizes Parkwood Hospital energy conservation initiatives

London, ON, Peter Love, Ontario's Chief Energy Conservation Officer, applauded the use of innovative responses to a range of energy conservation challenges at St. Joseph's Health Care, London. The work at their Parkwood Hospital site, undertaken with Honeywell, ranges from system changes to equipment upgrades. The facility will use almost 2 million kilowatt-hours less, which is expected to translate into over $170,000 per year in utility cost savings.

"Teaming between organizations like the St. Joseph's Health Care London and Honeywell make it possible to make great strides in energy efficiency in the healthcare environment where dollars are scarce," said Love. "These upgrades are going to create a more comfortable environment, help protect the environment and, of course, save money."

The energy management/facility renewal project received funding from Natural Resources Canada's Office of Energy Efficiency and Union Gas totaling over $80,000.

Delivering a Certificate of Recognition, Love said, "The Conservation Bureau is pleased to recognize the efforts of St. Joseph's Parkwood Hospital to improve the healthcare environment for both patients and staff. The upgrades that have occurred throughout this project will ensure that more healthcare dollars will go to benefit patients, and not to pay utility bills."

The renewal initiative of Parkwood hospital is a good template for other Ontario healthcare facilities. Addressing much needed facility improvements through a guaranteed approach makes sense.

The solutions implemented to achieve the savings include: ventilation improvements through zonal air control, thermal blanket for the therapeutic pool, electric light retrofitting and upgrades, and enhancements to the centralized control system solution.

Record M&A Activity in Global Electric and Gas Industry Expected to Continue

NEW YORK, March 8, 2006 - The M&A market in the global electricity and gas industry is entering a new blockbuster deal era. Following a record-breaking year in 2005, due largely to the rise of 'super-regional' utilities and consolidation in Europe, the sector is set for further escalation in deal volumes and values this year, according to PricewaterhouseCoopers' "Power Deals" report on M&A activity in the industry.

During 2005 new records were set for the number of deals, the total value of deals, the value of a single deal and the number of mega-deals valued at over US$10 billion. With 527 deals valued at a total of US$196 billion and five deals each exceeding US$10 billion, 2005 far out-ran 2004's high levels of activity.

"The electricity and gas M&A activity surpassed the exceptional momentum that had already built up and is continuing to gain speed in 2006," said Manfred Wiegand, Global Utilities Leader at PricewaterhouseCoopers. "We are seeing a new era of 'blockbuster deals.' Companies are consolidating and extending their regional footprints to attain non-organic growth in a tight sector facing high fuel prices and security of supply concerns. We are also seeing greater involvement of financial players in the market with the rise of infrastructure funds creating a new asset class."

European activity is fuelling the huge surge in total deal activity as utility companies move fast to consolidate in the EU in advance of the anticipated customer choice resulting from liberalized rules in 2007. But, while the biggest surge came in Europe, total deal numbers and value also rose virtually across the board. There is a trend globally toward domestic consolidation, with domestic deals accounting for 71% of all deals in 2005. Global activity, however, is still notable with a growing breed of infrastructure funds building global portfolios of primarily network assets.

"The run up to the 2007 full-market opening in Europe will continue to feed consolidation momentum in the EU," said Wiegand. "Around the globe, increased competition is driving companies to turn to M&A activities to deliver growth horizontally and vertically. High wholesale power, gas and carbon prices also are creating new platforms for deal activity, pushing up generation asset values and bolstering the rationale for deal prices. As we look ahead, we can expect to see greater integration of upstream and downstream entities and more moves by the mega-players. The attitude of the competition authorities will be critical to future deals."

According to Power Deals 2005:

Total number of deals in 2005 rose 15% from the year before -- up from 459 to 527. Total deal volume climbed from US$123 billion to US$196 billion, hitting a level nearly five times greater t