../Morning Post
Posted September 27 , 2010

Reducing Barriers to Crude Oil Investment Will Foster Job Creation, Higher Incomes, and Energy Security for Canada, U.S. and Mexico

CALGARY - A hodgepodge of misguided government policies, costly and time-consuming regulatory processes, and disputes with aboriginals over land claims have resulted in multiple barriers to investment in Canadian crude oil production and transportation, concludes a new study released today by the Fraser Institute, Canada's leading public policy think-tank.

The study, Towards North American Energy Security: Removing Barriers to Oil Industry Development, recommends nine policy changes that would reduce barriers to investment in the crude oil sector, and ultimately lead to additional job creation and reduced reliance on foreign oil imports for Canada, the United States and Mexico.

"Crude oil is an important element of North America's energy mix and will not be supplanted by other energy forms in the foreseeable future. With more than 81 per cent of the continent's proven oil reserves and as the major single-country supplier of oil to the United States, Canada has an opportunity to create jobs and boost its economy by increasing oil exports within North America," said Gerry Angevine, Fraser Institute senior economist in the Global Resource Centre and the study's author.

"Unfortunately, existing barriers to investment prevent accelerated development of this extensive resource base, much to the detriment of all Canadians."

The report examines barriers to investment in North American crude oil production and transportation facilities and points out that such obstacles are making it difficult for the sector to compete for investment with other industries and with oil industry opportunities overseas.

The study makes nine policy recommendations to better facilitate investment
in North America's resource base:

-- Ensure that oil production royalties are competitive with other
provinces, states, and countries.

-- Reflect in royalty regimes the higher cost of producing oil from
deepwater offshore and non-conventional sources. Governments must be
aware of the cost differences between conventional onshore oil
production on the one hand, and production in the outer continental
shelf and from non-conventional sources of supply (such as bitumen from
oil sands and oil from kerogen contained in oil shale) on the other. In
light of the substantial cost differences for exploration and production
development, including in some cases the cost of essential research,
policy makers need either to move to a flat tax methodology or, as a
minimum, reduce royalties to reflect market realities.

-- Remove uncertainty surrounding oil sands environmental policy.
Implementation of new environmental regulations that affect oil sands
bitumen production and upgrading should be expedited in order to remove
the cloud of uncertainty that has been hanging over the industry
regarding potential compliance costs.

-- Remove uncertainty regarding environmental policies that affect
conventional oil production. Federal, state, and provincial governments
need to remove uncertainty over possible environmental policy changes
related to atmospheric emissions that would affect conventional crude
oil production. This is especially important in the case of heavy crude
oil, because measures to curb greenhouse gas emissions will impose
considerable costs and will influence investment decisions. For similar
reasons, uncertainties over possible changes to environmental policies
surrounding offshore oil exploration and production development need to
be removed.

-- Remove moratoria on offshore exploration and development. Moratoria on
petroleum exploration and production in areas such as the Queen
Charlotte Basin and the U.S. Pacific Offshore should be lifted once the
authorities are satisfied, having studied the cause of the BP Deepwater
Horizon crude oil leak in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico, that the
environmental risks can be mitigated. With the lifting of the moratoria,
new areas for potential discoveries will be opened and additional
indigenous oil supplies can be tapped.

-- Streamline regulatory processes for obtaining energy pipeline
construction permits. Government involvement in the construction-
permitting process should be confined to non-commercial aspects such as
safety, the environmental impacts, and other matters of importance from
a public interest perspective.

-- Adopt standard, consistent procedures for resolving aboriginal land
claims. Such an approach will prevent these issues from delaying
pipeline project construction and saddling the ultimate users of the
energy commodities with inappropriate transportation costs.

-- Adopt measures to improve labour mobility. Extending the labour mobility
clause in the North American Free Trade Agreement that applies to
professionals to include the skilled trades would improve skilled worker
mobility among Canada, the United States, and Mexico. Canada, the United
States, and Mexico should also explore the possibility of securing
bilateral labour mobility arrangements with other countries, similar to
the arrangement in place between Australia and New Zealand.

-- Reduce barriers to Mexican oil production growth. In Mexico, heavy
taxation and constitutional restrictions on foreign direct investment
severely limit the ability of PEMEX, the Mexican state-owned petroleum
company, to invest in technology and resource exploration. Opening
investment to foreign companies would significantly boost Mexican oil
exploration and production development and help prevent Mexico from
becoming dependent on oil imports for years to come.

In addition to the employment and income benefits of increased petroleum investment, the report notes that accelerated development would bring domestic oil demand and production into closer balance, helping to improve continental energy security by reducing the vulnerability of oil supply to disruptions in shipments from the Middle East and other supply regions.

"Government must avoid intervening in energy investment decisions because the allocation of resources is best left to those who are motivated by market forces, have an in-depth knowledge of the technologies involved, and are prepared to take risks based on their understanding of how energy requirements are likely to change," Angevine said.

Towards North American Energy Security: Removing Barriers to Oil Industry Development is the second instalment in the Institute's Continental Energy Strategy series, which will culminate in forthcoming studies examining the natural gas and electric power sectors, as well as a report analyzing the role of renewable policy.

The complete study can be downloaded as a PDF, free of charge, at www.fraserinstitute.org.

Submit press release to pressrelease@exchangemagazine.com - Editor Jon Rohr - Content published on this site represents the opinion of the individual/organization and/or source provider of the Content. ExchangeMagazine.com is non-partisan, online journal. Privacy Policy. Copyright of Exchange produced editorial is the copyright of Exchange Business Communications Inc. 2010/*.*. Additional editorials, comments and releases are copyright of respective source(s) and/or institutions or organizations.


Contact an Exchange Representative

Current Issue October 2010
Subscribe FREE to Exchange Online today

Subscribe to Exchange News Daily

Submit Press Release
Visitor Centre
Advertising Inquires
Tel: 519.886.0298

Subscribe to Exchange Magazine Print Edition

Contact Information:

Exchange Business Communication Inc.
Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Tel: 519.886.0298

Jon Rohr

Account Manager

John Hobin

Matt Kennedy