____ Thursday September 15, 2016 ____



Study Shows Banks Failing to Meet Consumers’ Needs

Despite growing competition from FinTech firms, new research reveals many banks have not yet upgraded their outdated systems.

Tampa Bay, FL – New research published by NTT Data suggests that consumer loyalty is declining as banks have failed to modernize their legacy core systems, and 64% of banks view financial technology (FinTech) offerings as a threat. A separate study by McKinsey & Company revealed the extent of banks’ potential losses: by 2025, up to 40% of revenues and up to 60% of profits will be at risk. Monica Eaton-Cardone , an IT executive maintains that investing in technology and system upgrades now will help banks preserve their customer base, minimize losses to competitors and save money in the long run.

According to NTT Data, the majority of banks’ core deposit systems were architected more than 30 years ago, and fully 78% of banks’ spending for those legacy systems is on maintenance and regulatory compliance.(3) Among the banking industry survey respondents, 70% admit their existing processes cannot quickly adapt to change and 63% acknowledge they are challenged by the complexities of integration.(3) Though 80% of bankers say they plan to assess their core deposit system within the next 36 months, only 15% expect to begin a modernization effort within three years and just 4% expect to actually replace their core system within that timeframe.(3)

Meanwhile, FinTech firms have been gaining ground in the financial services market: 46% of consumers have an account with a FinTech provider and 22% describe FinTech offerings as “how banking should be.”(1) Furthermore, the NTT Data report revealed that 1 in 3 consumers would strongly consider switching primary banks for better online or mobile technology, and 1 in 4 would consider switching to a bank they consider more tech-savvy in general.(3)

“FinTech companies have raised the bar for consumer expectations of financial services. Consequently, banks that fail to upgrade outdated legacy systems will likely continue to lose market share to more technologically advanced competitors,” stated Eaton-Cardone, who currently serves as Chief Information Officer (CIO) of Global Risk Technologies and Chief Operating Officer (COO) of Chargebacks911. “Bank leaders should heed the research findings and recognize the long-term value in modernizing their core systems rather than spending over three-quarters of their budget to maintain legacy systems that are fast becoming obsolete.”

Research shows customers expect to bank when and how they choose. NTT Data reports that the top five things consumers want from banks are: 1) the ability to access their money immediately after making a deposit; 2) better customer service; 3) better benefits/cost of the relationship; 4) best tools for money management; and 5) best online and mobile technology.(3)

“Banks may be counting on customers’ comfort level with traditional financial services providers to keep them from defecting to FinTech firms. However, consumers have openly expressed their willingness to switch banks for better technology; and given that some traditional banks have already started investing in modernization efforts, financial institutions may soon find themselves losing customers to their more tech-friendly peers,” cautioned Eaton-Cardone. “I would advise banks to replace their legacy systems sooner rather than later. Not only will it help them to retain their existing customer base and save money they’re currently spending on maintaining outdated systems, but it can help them win over new business from competitors that continue to lag behind the technology curve.”

Did you enjoy reading this article, if so make a voluntary payment now.
Content published on this site represents the opinion of the individual/organization and/or source provider of the Content. ExchangeMagazine.com is non-partisan, online journal. Privacy Policy. Copyright of Exchange produced editorial is the copyright of Exchange Business Communications Inc. 2015. Additional editorials, comments and releases are copyright of respective source(s) and/or institutions or organizations.

Exchange Magazine Paper Version
Exchange Magazine - Digital version








More features & Profiles


Subscription Options